Yesterdays Dbacks and Angels game didnt make sense to me. Really, the whole series. Dbacks and Angels have similiar records, yet if you want to take the Angels, your paying twice as much.
First day you had Bumgarner vs Teheran. Both are having terrible years. Bum has the better name and has had better starts where tehran has not had any. So looks like line should be pretty even, yet if you took Dbacks you would get +140
Yesterday you Caleb Smith vs Bundy. Bundy a better year, but Caleb was decent last year and looked ok coming back. Take Dbacks and you have +190
Today Young vs Canning. You can get Dbacks at +140. Atleast this line is a little bit more accurate and no great value taking Dbacks.
Now its obvious angels can (and probably) win today. But the first two days were head scratchers. Its like oddsmakers were wanting you to bet the Dbacks and would win? I took Dbacks both previous games but small bets because it seemed like a trap. In hindsite wish I went big. Just curious why so much juice on the Angels vs dbacks in the series?
First day you had Bumgarner vs Teheran. Both are having terrible years. Bum has the better name and has had better starts where tehran has not had any. So looks like line should be pretty even, yet if you took Dbacks you would get +140
Yesterday you Caleb Smith vs Bundy. Bundy a better year, but Caleb was decent last year and looked ok coming back. Take Dbacks and you have +190
Today Young vs Canning. You can get Dbacks at +140. Atleast this line is a little bit more accurate and no great value taking Dbacks.
Now its obvious angels can (and probably) win today. But the first two days were head scratchers. Its like oddsmakers were wanting you to bet the Dbacks and would win? I took Dbacks both previous games but small bets because it seemed like a trap. In hindsite wish I went big. Just curious why so much juice on the Angels vs dbacks in the series?