Enfuego's Season Long Thread

Enfuego · Apr 2, 2013

[FONT=&quot]NL Play – SF Giants +101[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]AL Total – TB/Baltimore Under 7

Experimental Play – Baltimore Orioles +151 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 NL Sides: 1-0-0 +100 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 AL Totals: 1-0-0[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 Experimental Plays: 1-0-0 +105 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units[/FONT]
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w

unctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w

ontVertAlignCellWithSp/> <w

ontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/> <w

ontVertAlignInTxbx/> <w:Word11KerningPairs/> <w:CachedColBalance/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->

$am$ter · Apr 2, 2013

great start! GL to a great profitable season

varkeyboy · Apr 2, 2013

Awesome stuff!

Enfuego · Apr 3, 2013

[FONT=&quot]A carbon copy of yesterday. Good luck.

NL Play – SF Giants +113[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]AL Total – TB/Baltimore Under 7

Experimental Play – Baltimore +127 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 NL Sides: 2-0-0 +201 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 AL Totals: 1-1-0[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 Experimental Plays: 2-0-0 +251 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units[/FONT]
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w

unctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w

ontVertAlignCellWithSp/> <w

ontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/> <w

ontVertAlignInTxbx/> <w:Word11KerningPairs/> <w:CachedColBalance/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->

Enfuego · Apr 4, 2013

NL Play – Philadelphia Phillies +116
AL Total – Detroit/Minnesota Under 8.5 & KC/CWS Under 8.5

Experimental Play – Minnesota +126 & CWS -125 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)

2013 NL Sides: 3-0-0 +314 Units
2013 AL Totals: 1-2-0
2013 Experimental Plays: 2-1-0 +151 Units

2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units
2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5
2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units

thenatti · Apr 4, 2013

Good luck Enfuego!

XSPower · Apr 4, 2013

Enfuego said:
NL Play – Philadelphia Phillies +116
AL Total – Detroit/Minnesota Under 8.5 & KC/CWS Under 8.5

Experimental Play – Minnesota +126 & CWS -125 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)

2013 NL Sides: 3-0-0 +314 Units
2013 AL Totals: 1-2-0
2013 Experimental Plays: 2-1-0 +151 Units

2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units
2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5
2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units

Thanks and good luck today!!!

XS

candylicker · Apr 4, 2013

thxs for postong. was wondering if u have any idea how many u won in row last year. and also how many losses u had in row.

Enfuego · Apr 4, 2013

candylicker said:
thxs for postong. was wondering if u have any idea how many u won in row last year. and also how many losses u had in row.

I don't have any idea Candy but I do know I rarely go 0-2. I know some guys put a little on the first play and then double down if it loses. It was a profitable night tonight.

candylicker · Apr 4, 2013

oK. Thank yOU

thewiscokid · Apr 4, 2013

Excellent work E.

Enfuego · Apr 5, 2013

NL Play – Atlanta -182
AL Total – LAA/Texas Under 10

Experimental Play – Texas -118 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)

2013 NL Sides: 4-0-0 +430 Units
2013 AL Totals: 2-3-0
2013 Experimental Plays: 3-2-0 +177 Units

2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units
2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5
2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units

varkeyboy · Apr 5, 2013

Kill it today!! F the Scrubs =). I'm 0-3 with stupid Cubs game. Went against them in G1 and took Pitt....went with them in G2 and they lose......take Pitt again in G3 and those losers win.

thewiscokid · Apr 5, 2013

Hey, E, just curious why you don't put units on totals line... no complaints, just wondering.

Enfuego · Apr 5, 2013

thewiscokid said:
Hey, E, just curious why you don't put units on totals line... no complaints, just wondering.

It's a good question. I guess I always just thought of the totals line as a -110 but I'll go back and add it up. That will keep me legit on the forum.

Good win today on the AL total.

Enfuego · Apr 6, 2013

NL Play – LAD RL +105
AL Total – CWS/Seattle Under 7.5 -104

Experimental Play – CWS +124 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)

2013 NL Sides: 5-0-0 +530 Units
2013 AL Totals: 3-3-0 -25 Units
2013 Experimental Plays: 4-2-0 +252 Units

2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units
2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5
2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units

thewiscokid · Apr 6, 2013

Enfuego said:
It's a good question. I guess I always just thought of the totals line as a -110 but I'll go back and add it up. That will keep me legit on the forum.

Good win today on the AL total.

That is what I figured given MLs in baseball are all over the place compared to standard juice on o/u's. Nice work thus far and BOL going forward.

VegasVic · Apr 6, 2013

You certainly know your stuff sir and the results prove that out. Just a small critique regarding your record keeping. Isn't +2,765 units a bit misleading? Shouldn't it be +27.65 units?

I appreciate your selective style on limited plays per day. No doubt reflective of your poker education in that you're only playing the best of starting hands.

Continued success Enuego

Enfuego · Apr 6, 2013

VegasVic said:
You certainly know your stuff sir and the results prove that out. Just a small critique regarding your record keeping. Isn't +2,765 units a bit misleading? Shouldn't it be +27.65 units?

I appreciate your selective style on limited plays per day. No doubt reflective of your poker education in that you're only playing the best of starting hands.

Continued success Enuego

Here's what I'll do VegasVic to make it easier. My units are based on a standard $100 play. I'll start putting a dollar sign in front of the units and hopefully that clears it up. Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.

Enfuego · Apr 7, 2013

[FONT=&quot]Oh well, played the LAD RL and they win on the ML but I refuse to lay -235 on a baseball game no matter if C. Kershaw is on the bump or not. Other plays were 2-0 so another 66% day and I’ll take that every day. By the way, I’ve seen three LAD games so far this year and L. Cruz really sucks. How he made the roster is beyond me. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]NL Play – St. Louis +126[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]AL Total – TB/Cleveland Under 7 -110[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
Experimental Play – Cleveland Indians +165 (I wouldn’t play this until it’s proven. Just want to track it this year)[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 NL Sides: 5-1-0 +430 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 AL Totals: 4-3-0 +75 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2013 Experimental Plays: 5-2-0 +376 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 NL Sides: 77-46-0 +2,765 Units[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 AL Totals: 72-42-5[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]2012 Experimental Play: 65-49-0 +3,002 Units[/FONT]
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w

unctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w

ontVertAlignCellWithSp/> <w

ontBreakConstrainedForcedTables/> <w

ontVertAlignInTxbx/> <w:Word11KerningPairs/> <w:CachedColBalance/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->