Eli accused of memorabilia fraud in court docs

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
Eli Manning turned over a potentially incriminating email earlier this month in connection with a lawsuit that claims the quarterback, the New York Giants and a team equipment manager knowingly provided false game-worn memorabilia to collectors.


The email was included in a court filing in Bergen County (N.J.) Superior Court by the plaintiffs -- collectors Eric Inselberg, Michael Jakab and Sean Godown -- who first filed suit three years ago.


On April 27, 2010, Manning sent an email to Giants head equipment manager Joe Skiba asking for "two helmets that can pass as game used." The email was initiated after Manning was sent a note by Alan Zucker, his marketing agent throughout his career, to come up with some equipment to satisfy his obligation to provide such materials to sports memorabilia company Steiner Sports.


The plaintiffs' lawyer, Brian Brook of Clinton, Brook & Peed, told ESPN that the email, included among roughly 200 pages of documents Manning produced as part of legal discovery, was key to specifically linking the quarterback to the lawsuit, which alleges an elaborate scheme to produce, pass off and sell memorabilia as game-used that was not.


Prior to that email, the lawsuit had included only an alleged conversation between Manning and Skiba to put together some equipment that could be described as game-used. The lawsuit alleges that Manning not only had been aware of the passing off of inauthentic items of his as game-used but also was party to their creation.


The suit also alleges that the Giants were complicit by deleting the email from their accounts.


"The email, taken out of context, was shared with the media by an unscrupulous memorabilia dealer and his counsel who for years has been seeking to leverage a big payday," McCarter & English, the law firm representing the Giants in the case, said in a statement. "The email predates any litigation, and there was no legal obligation to store it on the Giants server. Eli Manning is well known for his integrity and this is just the latest misguided attempt to defame his character."


The release of the email to the public record through the filing was first reported by the New York Post.


Brook said that, based on what he believes was the Giants' cooperation with authorities, his client, Inselberg, was one of six memorabilia dealers indicted for selling fake game-used items after an FBI investigation. The charges against Inselberg were dropped when the Justice Department admitted it lacked evidence, and Inselberg, believing his reputation was greatly damaged, then filed the lawsuit against the Giants.


The Giants conducted an internal investigation in 2011 into their selling and producing of game-used memorabilia.


The plaintiffs' claim around that specific investigation has been dismissed, but Brook is still arguing that the results of the investigation should be admissible in court. Brook said the Giants have subpoenaed 70 connections to Inselberg and still have not been able to find any evidence that he fabricated any memorabilia.


<article class="ad-300"></article>Inselberg, who loaned many pieces of his collection to a memorabilia collection inside MetLife Stadium, said he had purchased hundreds of game-used items directly from the Giants' equipment managers. Inselberg alleges that he was sold many of the game-used items, including a Michael Strahan Super Bowl game-used jersey that was authenticated and photo matched, despite the fact that the Giants presented another jersey to Strahan and told him that that was his jersey from the game.


The lawsuit claims other allegedly fake items included ones described as game-used from Manning, Osi Umenyiora and Tiki Barber.


It is not likely that Manning, the Giants or their employees would be subject to criminal prosecution as the alleged actions in question have passed the federal five-year statute of limitations.


The trial is scheduled to begin on Sept. 25.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
1,594
Tokens
Memorabilia dealers are shady-ass characters in general. Just pointing fingers to cover their ass now. And Eli asking for things that "can pass as game used," i don't think is necessarily intentionally fraudulent. Off season non-story.
 

smoke'em if you got'em
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Messages
487
Tokens
Funny thing is if it was Tom, It would be world news for many days! Funny how media works
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
Kinda ridiculous that there are known sites on the internet that's been around for years selling fake memorabilia, yet they don't do sh!t about it...
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Seedy, disgusting, fraudulent business. One I've never understood why it even exists, but it does, and sadly it's big. Eli stepped in it, unless that E mail is truly out of context, and there's more to it than we know now. Eli basically admitted he's a willing, active party to a fraud. I would think this might fall under Goodell's very, very broad powers of conduct detrimental to the NFL. And those powers are broad enough that a guy doesn't have to be convicted of anything. Players have been suspended even when cases are dropped against them, they win the case, or a case never happens. I think Eli might be facing a game or 2 on the sidelines if Roger is truly fair and balanced. Eli is truly one of the good guys in the NFL, but this is not a good look for him, the team, and the league.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,656
Tokens
And OJ has to go to jail for trying to straighten these charlatans out? Where is the justice?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,329
Tokens
I don't see how the words Eli used could be taking out of context. The words seem to clearly show no regard to what would be offering fraudulent merchandise. This is why I never got into it as I knew how shady it was. The few pieces I do have are things I got either directly from a person or through a person I know for a fact is airtight with them & is on the up & up.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
[h=2]NFL has no comment on Giants, Eli Manning lawsuit[/h]Posted by Mike Florio on April 14, 2017, 8:07 PM EDT
107687382-e1492214812511.jpg
Getty Images
Hiding in plain sight for more than three years, the civil suit against the Giants and quarterback Eli Manning alleging fraudulent memorabilia sales took on new significance on Thursday, via the report from the New York Post regarding an arguable smoking-gun email from Manning that the plaintiffs believe proves active involvement in a scheme to pass off helmets as game used when they weren’t.
At a time when plenty (including Chris Christie) have a lot to say about it, the NFL has nothing to say.
“We will decline comment,” league spokesman Brian McCarthy told PFT by email on Friday evening.
Although the situation doesn’t involve the violation of any in-game rules and despite the fact that no criminal charges have been filed, the NFL could wedge the situation into the scope of the Personal Conduct Policy, if the league wants to proceed in that fashion.
“Conduct by anyone in the league that is illegal, violent, dangerous, or irresponsible puts innocent victims at risk, damages the reputation of others in the game, and undercuts public respect and support for the NFL,” the Personal Conduct Policy broadly provides in one of its preliminary paragraphs. “We must endeavor at all times to be people of high character; we must show respect for others inside and outside our workplace; and we must strive to conduct ourselves in ways that favorably reflect on ourselves, our teams, the communities we represent, and the NFL.”
The laundry list of prohibited acts appearing later in the policy includes the following: “Crimes of dishonesty such as blackmail, extortion, fraud, money laundering, or racketeering.”
Pre-Ray Rice, there could be no crime without a criminal prosecution. Now that the league has decided to disregard the decisions made by the criminal justice system and to engage in its own investigation, it’s possible (if the league so desires) that this situation could result in not only a review but also the imposition of discipline.
The league could proceed now if it wants. If a verdict ultimately is entered against the Giants and/or Eli, it would be harder for the NFL to do nothing. Either way, the Giants and Eli need to take into account the possibility of a league investigation when considering whether to settle the case before any additional proof of fraud or other conduct prohibited by the Personal Conduct Policy becomes public.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,925
Messages
13,575,333
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com