Eagles/Giant over 41.........

[BadCo]

These two teams meet in week 10.....36-31 final.

McNabb was 17/36 194 yds 2 td's.

Looking at the boxscore from that game the thing that stands out to me is rushing yards as Eagles had 106 for the game while Giants did what they do and ran for 219 which sets up Manning to have a great game.

Thinking that the Eagles know to win this game it must be in a shoot out which means Mcnabb and Westbrook need to be the meat and potatoes.

Pass early and often or dump off to Westbrook as their running game.

Conventional wisdom is when playing a divisional opponent the two teams know each other so well that leads to high scoring games.

All this being said the line opened 44 down to 41 so WTF do I know.

But I'm playing the over sink or swim.




<table class="tablehead" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tbody><tr class="oddrow" align="right"><td>
</td><td>
</td><td>
</td><td>
</td><td>
</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[Twisted]

wind at the lands is deadly. You may see 60 runnin plays today Tread Lightly, GL

 

[winbet]

On a normal Day this Total would be around 47 so the question is, does that wind detract the score by 6pts? Personally I've bet the Under 43 in the hope of it falling to 40 but its appears to be one of those Games that after 10 minutes you wonder why the fuck you bet it, under or over. Good luck Bad co :drink:

 

[CheepGobbler]

Isn't winds effect on totals somewhat of a fallacy? You would also expect more mistakes in the punting game and more interceptions right? I'm sure there is some effect, but it is dampened somewhat by the fact that the game can turn into a comedy of errors. Add in the fact that both teams have basically only possession type receivers anyway, and i'm not sure there is the effect here that some of you guys think.

I've just bet the same thing before i read this post, so go over...

 

[MikRetSam]

i kinda like philly & over........
must win for philly, they should be good for 17

 

[Scans33]

All 3 Eagles/Giants games played in 2007 went under .... 2 of them went WAY under ... just something to think about.

 

[CaptFlippy]

BadCo,
I had this as a huge play and backed down! the wind is horrible in the Meadowlands, steady 20mph gusting upwards 24-26. Wind is Philly's enemy, no ground game with Westbrook at 70% and Buckholder out, points off turnovers could stream in but I wouldn't bank on it. Good Luck anyway you go!

 

[boyzfan]

this thing opened at 44 and dropped 3 points does anyone know why?

 

[BadCo]

Westbrook is healthy and they have had a week and a half to rest.

Loss if by land win if by air is Rieds only option.

They will not win a ground game wind or no wind,and if they fall behind early even better.


McNabb will also utilize more designed rollouts. RB Brian Westbrook (knee/ankle) certainly has not been himself and this offense is much better when he's healthy. He looked healthy last Thursday, rushing for 110 yards, and has a very long week to prepare and rest. The Eagles' running game has been a huge problem this season, particularly in short-yardage situations. This has limited coach Andy Reid's play-calling abilities. Reid has been placing a lot of pressure on the shoulders of his quarterback and passing game. McNabb's career numbers are terrific in terms of his ball security, but that has been a problem lately

 

[winbet]

Isn't winds effect on totals somewhat of a fallacy? You would also expect more mistakes in the punting game and more interceptions right? I'm sure there is some effect, but it is dampened somewhat by the fact that the game can turn into a comedy of errors. Add in the fact that both teams have basically only possession type receivers anyway, and i'm not sure there is the effect here that some of you guys think.

I've just bet the same thing before i read this post, so go over...

As with everything, its not just the wind but the impact on the Teams. Basically the stronger the Wind the less Yards per pass there is resulting in not only timing patterns put under pressure but 1st downs, if a Team is a good running Team there's a chance that they get even more conservative. As for your theory, this comes about when one Team falls behind and literally throws caution to the Wind resulting in silly plays, however by that time a good portion of the Game is gone. Its all down to the Spread in the end and personally in these conditions I would need 40 minimum for the over or no bet. :drink:

 

[mgh56]

BadCo

I'm with you on the NYG/Phi over (I've got it at 421/2though). That's my top play for the early games today. Let's hit it!:toast:

 

[2PLAYSMAX]

On this as well. 1st H 20.5 over for me.

 

[BadCo]

I'm with you on the NYG/Phi over (I've got it at 421/2though). That's my top play for the early games today. Let's hit it!:toast:

Cool this is what I like.

Call me crazy but a guy with just his 3rd post is on my side.

Gambling gods let this happen,first start out a house of fire and only then when you think your da man do they get even.