<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FatFrank:
Pat, check with Ken's "Insider"
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Really? Great. That was what I couldn't understand. Keeping winning wagers based on a rules violation? LOL.
If they finally paid and honored the bets they took, hats off to them for that.
Pat, check with Ken's "Insider"
Really? Great. That was what I couldn't understand. Keeping winning wagers based on a rules violation? LOL.
If they finally paid and honored the bets they took, hats off to them for that.
One more thing... LOL
Sorry to say: Ken and his agendas are the ones being tarnished with all of this.
No independent person believes Ken's Saturday, no it was Friday, no it was Saturday when my "insider" told me blah blah blah... And his removing E-Winner only after an Hour after 1st hearing of a slow/no pay.
Sorry to say: Ken and his agendas are the ones being tarnished with all of this.
No independent person believes Ken's Saturday, no it was Friday, no it was Saturday when my "insider" told me blah blah blah... And his removing E-Winner only after an Hour after 1st hearing of a slow/no pay.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by krackman:
I would stay far away from this book. Heard to much bad stuff the last two days that has nothing to do with this bonus abuse situation.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Shrink pulls the plug on them and Krackman makes this statement. Make your own conclusions. This will keep me away from Ewinner, at least for the time-being. Everyone is fully entitled to their own opinion though and hope everybody makes wise decisions that are involved.
I also wish nothing but the very best for Ewinner in the future. That is of course if they are trully an honorable and reputable sportsbook.
I would stay far away from this book. Heard to much bad stuff the last two days that has nothing to do with this bonus abuse situation.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Shrink pulls the plug on them and Krackman makes this statement. Make your own conclusions. This will keep me away from Ewinner, at least for the time-being. Everyone is fully entitled to their own opinion though and hope everybody makes wise decisions that are involved.
I also wish nothing but the very best for Ewinner in the future. That is of course if they are trully an honorable and reputable sportsbook.
Pat-
The answer to your question is no. I and my buddy have not been paid any winnings. Hell, I would just settle for the the initial deposit I made at this point which is clearly stated in their rules. But no, I get nothing. I don't even get a chance to prove my case with id's or whatever the hell else they need. Honorable and reputable book; don't make me laugh.
The answer to your question is no. I and my buddy have not been paid any winnings. Hell, I would just settle for the the initial deposit I made at this point which is clearly stated in their rules. But no, I get nothing. I don't even get a chance to prove my case with id's or whatever the hell else they need. Honorable and reputable book; don't make me laugh.
>>>If they finally paid and honored the bets they took, hats off to them for that. <<<
I believe all winnings should be paid on all winnings bets, Patrick. But we/you don't know if studbolt and all his aliases won using their scammed bonuses. Right? I would think those winnings should be subject to forfeiture.
I believe all winnings should be paid on all winnings bets, Patrick. But we/you don't know if studbolt and all his aliases won using their scammed bonuses. Right? I would think those winnings should be subject to forfeiture.
Stud - YOU STILL HAVEN'T BEEN PAID!!? With all this carrying on I thought they at least honored their bets by now! What a joke.
No wonder they will pay for anyone to send them their money back. No shit Sherlock! You'd be a fool to play here. You win a load and then they catch you on a technicality and you forfeit your winnings?!
I thought Frank had said they did a least honor the bets they took? If they haven't this is a stiff book, it's very simple.
No wonder they will pay for anyone to send them their money back. No shit Sherlock! You'd be a fool to play here. You win a load and then they catch you on a technicality and you forfeit your winnings?!
I thought Frank had said they did a least honor the bets they took? If they haven't this is a stiff book, it's very simple.
Aliases! I have only one other account other than my own that was used off my cable modem. I told everybody that I would be willing to try and prove the identity of myself as well as my buddy's. I do not know the other accounts or who they are. But why am I not even allowed to prove my side of the story? Why didn't the book call me about this before stealing my money? Why didn't the book email me before stealing my money? Why haven't I been at least paid the initial deposit stated in their rules that they want to be so strictly followed?
