PROOF, Scumbag, do you HAVE it? No? Then, STFU!!!!
Answer the QUESTION, Scumbag:
I've noticed that you acknowledged that you got BUTT fucked in our little wager and slunk away, to initially honor it, but never gave an explanation of the "epiphany" that made you "see the light" and turn you into a welching scumbag by coming back early-nor have you explained how YOU know that
BIDEN DIDN'T WIN. I DIDN'T LOSE, ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and, most importantly, why his cohorts didn't "bother" to show said "proof" in SIXTY-FIVE BULLSHIT "VOTER FRAUD" LAWSUITS WHERE THEY GOT BUTT FUCKED IN EACH AND EVERY ONE
You're a liar, a welch, delusional, and a waste of life, Glazed Balls.
PROOF, Scumbag, do you HAVE it? No? Then, STFU!!!!
Answer the QUESTION, Scumbag:
I've noticed that you acknowledged that you got BUTT fucked in our little wager and slunk away, to initially honor it, but never gave an explanation of the "epiphany" that made you "see the light" and turn you into a welching scumbag by coming back early-nor have you explained how YOU know that
BIDEN DIDN'T WIN. I DIDN'T LOSE, ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and, most importantly, why his cohorts didn't "bother" to show said "proof" in SIXTY-FIVE BULLSHIT "VOTER FRAUD" LAWSUITS WHERE THEY GOT BUTT FUCKED IN EACH AND EVERY ONE
You're a liar, a welch, delusional, and a waste of life, Glazed Balls.
PROOF, Scumbag, do you HAVE it? No? Then, STFU!!!!
Answer the QUESTION, Scumbag:
I've noticed that you acknowledged that you got BUTT fucked in our little wager and slunk away, to initially honor it, but never gave an explanation of the "epiphany" that made you "see the light" and turn you into a welching scumbag by coming back early-nor have you explained how YOU know that
BIDEN DIDN'T WIN. I DIDN'T LOSE, ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and, most importantly, why his cohorts didn't "bother" to show said "proof" in SIXTY-FIVE BULLSHIT "VOTER FRAUD" LAWSUITS WHERE THEY GOT BUTT FUCKED IN EACH AND EVERY ONE
You're a liar, a welch, delusional, and a waste of life, Glazed Balls.
MAGA-nut job, in the words of Chris Tucker in "Friday:"Great article from Brain Cates , I linked to his blog and also copy/pasted the specific article
Rise of the New Media Newsletter | Brian Cates | Substack
Personal blog of political columnist and pundit Brian Cates. Formerly writing for The Epoch Times, X22 Report and Uncover DC. Click to read Rise of the New Media Newsletter, by Brian Cates, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.briancates.substack.com
He talks about what is being accomlpished by Durham and the approach hs is taking.....it can seem fruitless if you are a doomer or cant see the 40k view of events, but Durham gonna fk them up!!!
Durham Continues To Reveal Previously Undisclosed SpyGate Evidence How Do You Break 5 Years of Relentless & Endless Russia Russia Russia Propaganda Programming That Still Influences A Large Segment Of The American Public? John Durham Thinks He Knows...
Brian Cates Oct 16
Badlands Media will always put out its content for free, but you can support us by becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. Help our collective of citizen journalists take back the narrative from the MSM. We are the news now. Upgrade to paid
The trial of a key member of the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign’s dirty tricks team is now winding down in an Alexandria, Virginia courtroom. A lot of media commentary regarding the Durham Special Counsel is being focused on a narrative that this trial will be it for Durham, and that he’s going to wrap it up now. There will be no further indictments or investigatory actions by the SCO and he’s going to devote his last months as Special Counsel to writing his final report.
“Yeah, keep telling yourselves that…” The narrative holds that Durham is going to completely ignore the second half of the scope he was given when he was appointed to be the Special Counsel to investigate the Spygate scandal. That is, that Durham will take no action on the multitude of obvious felonies that occurred when a bogus warrant application using fake shit that came straight from the Hillary Clinton campaign was approved and renewed three times to target the Donald J. Trump campaign for federal investigations and surveillance during the 2016 election and into the Trump administration itself. I disagree that Durham is going to shirk his duty and never address the main reason for his being appointed a Special Counsel before riding off into the sunset. Now I’ll explain why I think that. In ordinary cases, the prosecutor uses a grand jury, builds a case and then unseals indictments, makes arrests and then holds trials or accepts plea bargains on the basis of the evidence collected. It’s pretty straightforward. Except in the extraordinary circumstances where there’s been a massive criminal conspiracy amongst mainstream news media to taint your prospective jury pool for going on 5 + years. Most RICO investigations haven’t had:
- The New York Times
- The Washington Post
- CNN
- ABC
- NBC
- CBS
- Fox News
- Time Magazine
- Newsweek
- NPR
- Twitter/Facebook working relentlessly to preemptively poison the well for 3 years before a US Attorney is even appointed to publicly begin their investigation and get their boots on.
And then have these same news media organizations keep up their immersive gaslighting for another three years while the US Attorney/Special Counsel is conducting his investigation. You either recognize this special situation that exists, or you do not. I can assure you from what I’ve observed of Durham since June of 2019, that he recognizes the task he faces in trying to counter almost 6 years of fanatical gaslighting about RussiaGate. Durham Is Engaged In Counter-Programming After Almost 6 Years of Gaslighting Durham is having to prosecute the massive RussiaGate ‘joint venture’ in reverse. He’s using the most minor of charges faced by ground-floor level RICO conspiracy personnel to surface key evidence that’s been held back for half a decade. He’s used the Sussmann & Danchenko trials as venues to bring out a ton of evidence. Why was much of this evidence held back for five years? I’m glad you asked. Durham’s had to do this backwards to counter a massive psychological disinformation campaign that is still ongoing, but now to much less effect than just a year or two ago. If all the things I’ve listed below came out five — or even just two — years ago, would it have moved the needle at all on the issue of RussiaGate? When most of the population is still buying into the ceaseless gaslighting? With the first two trials, Durham is putting the final nails in the coffin of that Russia Russia Russia disinformation campaign. I understand that a lot of people do not accept this take, that Durham’s been forced to do this backwards to try to counter more than 6 years of relentless propaganda and gaslighting so he can attempt fair trials. But it is an eminently rational position. Yes, I will stipulate for the record that if there had not been a vast, well-organized psychological operation targeting the American public for 6 years using
- law enforcement agencies
- intelligence agencies
- Congressional hearings and investigations
- the entire Big Brother Fake News Matrix mainstream media - including all the major social media platforms
- popular culture books, movies, music to sell the fake Russia Russia Russia narrative that Donald Trump and many of the people around him were Russian agents and traitors to their country, John Durham could have dropped the big indictments three years ago. Yes, I will stipulate that for the record. BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT HAPPENED, IS IT? There was a years-long mass psychosis campaign to condition the American public to view Trump and his close associates as agents of the Putin government in Moscow. You can’t even rationally debate otherwise. We all saw it. We all lived through it.
And a rather large segment of the American public are still influenced by that mass psychosis campaign. While many have woken up to the lies that were always the center of the “Russia Russia Russia!” hoax, some have not. People who keep insisting the big indictments needed to be unsealed years ago refuse to acknowledge the power of the psyop the American public has been subjected to. Durham realized early on the massive task they faced. He and his team had to counter more than three years worth of a mass formation psychosis before William Barr even appointed him. And the mass media campaign has continued ferociously as Durham has done his investigating for the past three years.
Yes, enough evidence had surfaced by June of 2019 for Durham to have begun unsealing indictments by early 2020, especially after DOJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz’s FISA Abuse Report was released in December of 2019. But Durham is a realist. He knew exactly what would happen if he went early and unsealed indictments against all the major players while Trump was still in the White House, while Barr was still Attorney General, and most of the American public was still slumbering peacefully in the arms of the Big Brother Fake News Media Matrix, being serenated with relentless, endless propaganda about how Trump was Putin’s stooge. How do you break the programming so you can get a fair hearing at the trials? How do you ‘redpill’ enough of the public to wake them up from the RussiaGate Matrix, so to speak?
The Great Awakening had to happen first. Not just on the national stage about the globalist and CCP threats, but also on the mainstream press, the DC cabal and the RussiaGate hoax that they invented and mesmerized much of the country with for more than five years. Durham has to attempt to level this playing field before he drops the big indictments. That’s the reasoning behind the strategy he’s been pursuing. What Evidence To Counter The Programming Did Durham Surface During The Sussmann Trial? What did Durham reveal during the Sussmann trial that had been carefully concealed for more than five years?
The face you make when you get caught as a private citizen with your own private spy ring spying on a sitting President in the White House Let’s count:
- Hillary Clinton’s private spy ring. Why was Durham bringing that to light so important? Because by using private cybersecurity contractors working inside the federal agencies as her own secret operatives, Hillary Clinton was spying on people without any kind of a warrant. See, I don’t mean to shock anybody, but did you know that Hillary Clinton and her political campaign for President back in 2016 was not any kind of law enforcement or intelligence agency, and she did not go to any court to get approval of the spying her minions were doing for her? Well it’s true. And Durham got it on the record.
- Clinton’s private spy ring was spying on Trump and his associates at Trump Tower, his office building, and most importantly, at the White House itself once he moved in.
- The Clinton campaign gave her private spy ring inside the federal agencies databases an enemies list of specific targets for surveillance.
- Clinton’s private spy ring trawled the federal agency databases looking for data related to these people on the enemies list they were given.
- Clinton’s private spy ring was paid to steal classified/nonpublic data off of these federal agency databases and construct the Trump/Russia collusion allegation we’ve come to call “The Alfa Bank Hoax”. [I suspect but cannot prove at this point that some of the stolen data from the federal agency databases related to the Trump associates on the Clinton campaign’s enemies list ended up in the Steele Dossier.]
- The data stolen by Clinton’s private spy ring that had been developed into the Alfa Bank Hoax under the watchful eyes and direction of the Clinton campaign’s lawyers at Perkins Coie was then given to the news media and to two specific federal agencies: a law enforcement agency [FBI] and an intelligence agency [CIA]
- Once the FBI had closed it’s Alfa Bank hoax investigation by the time Trump assumed office, Clinton’s dirty tricks squad tried again to get another investigation started with a different federal agency. They revised and expanded the Alfa Bank hoax with new data they’d stolen from the servers inside the Executive Office of the President [EOP] and brought that to the CIA to see if they could convince the CIA to investigate.
- Some of the EOP data they added to the revised and expanded Alfa Bank hoax that they presented to the CIA in February of 2017 was stolen from off the White House’s servers after Donald J. Trump had been sworn in as the nation’s 45th President.
- Members of the FBI are targets in ongoing investigations. FBI personnel testifying on the stand stated they were subjects of investigations.
- The Clinton campaign, Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, Rodney Joffe & his merry crew of cyber contractors, they all tried to thwart federal grand jury subpoenas by making bogus claims of attorney/client privilege. Durham demonstrated on the record that more than 80% of these claims were bogus on their face. Not one thing you read in this list above had been publicly revealed for more than five years until Durham himself began revealing it in the Sussmann case court filings and then during the trial itself. Now, with the Danchenko trial, Durham is repeating the template. What Evidence To Counter The Programming Is Durham Revealing At The Danchenko Trial? So, what has Durham revealed during the Danchenko trial that was also carefully concealed for more than five years? Let’s count that too.
- The FBI didn’t verify a single allegation they used in Steele Dossier before taking allegations out of it and using them in a spy warrant on Carter Page.
- The FBI was so hot to use the Steele Dossier, when they couldn’t verify any of the allegations they wanted to use in the warrant, with the 2016 election fast approaching, in October they offered Christopher Steele payment of up to $1 million dollars to corroborate it for them. Steele couldn’t verify a single one of the allegations either.
- At the time the FBI used the Steele Dossier allegations in the FISA warrant on Carter Page, Steele still had not identified the primary sub-source [PSS] to the agency. The FBI Crossfire Hurricane team supposedly did not learn that the PSS was Danchenko until late December.
- After realizing Steele’s PSS was Danchenko, the FBI was aware there had been a counterintelligence.
Read it and WEEP, you brainless, always wrong, cocksucker AND TAKE THAT DONG DEEEEEEEEEEEEEP IN YOUR DIRT CHUTE DOUCHEBAG:
The Bill Barr-orchestrated Durham investigation of those who investigated Trump goes down in flames 
In an abuse of the mission of the Department of Justice, former Attorney General Bill Barr ordered an investigation into the decision to open the Trump- Russia probe. This "investigate-the-investigators" idiocy was headed up by special counsel John Durham. Durham has thus far brought two prosecution, alleging two individuals lied to the FBI. The first prosecution failed, resulting in a not guilty verdict, and prompted a scathing rebuke by one of the jurors who said the jury's time "could have been better spent." Today, the second case also went down in flames, resulting in a prompt not guilty verdict. It probably qualifies as irony that the Durham investigating, which Barr initiated in what looks like an attempt to protect a criminal president, has distinguished itself as a . . . which hunt.
The whole world Russian Collusion was a fraud, except for maybe a few really stupid pawns and parrots.
Convicting somebody beyond reasonable doubt in a treasonous, colluding and toxic environment is a tall task.
The nuances of the truth on lost on the simpletons, they can't think
Convicting somebody beyond reasonable doubt in a treasonous, colluding and toxic environment is a tall task.
The nuances of the truth on lost on the simpletons, they can't think
u should be embarrassed, and therefore, QUIET, unless ur an idiot...which you are. Notice that even somebody as stupid as MAGA-k#$t has the good sense to, at least for the moment, STFU.
Trump’s Special Prosecutor John Durham LOSES ANOTHER and his LAST Federal Criminal Trial
The Special Prosecutor John Durham hired by former Attorney General Bill Barr back in October 2020 to target for prosecution individuals who provided information about Trump’s links to Russia lost his second and final federal criminal trial as the jury acquitted Igor Dichanko on all remaining criminal counts of lying to the FBI.
