Doug Marrone opts out of Bills deal

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
Doug Marrone has opted out of his contract as coach of the Buffalo Bills and is now a free agent to pursue other jobs.

Marrone exercised the unique option during the final hours of a three-day window that opened Monday, stipulated in the four-year contract he signed with the Bills in 2013. The opt-out clause was included in the original contract in the event of an ownership change, which occurred when Terry and Kim Pegula purchased the franchise in October.


"We are disappointed that Coach Marrone will no longer be an important part of our organization," Bills owner Terry Pegula said in a statement. "We thank him for all of his hard work and leadership during his tenure and wish him and his family the best with the next chapter in their lives.


"We will now begin the important process of conducting a thorough search for a new head coach as we continue to strive to reach our goal of returning to the playoffs and bringing a championship to Buffalo for our fans."


While Marrone was negotiating an extension beyond the two years remaining on his four-year, $16 million deal, uncertainty over potential organizational changes influenced his decision, according to sources.



<cite>AP Images/Paul Sancya</cite>Doug Marrone opted out of his contract as coach of the Bills and is now a free agent to pursue other jobs available in the NFL.





Marrone's clause also allows him to walk away with his 2015 guaranteed base salary of $4 million without it counting as an offset against any future salary even if he should land another job, sources said. Marrone now is free to negotiate with any team seeking a head coach.


Teams with current vacancies include the Chicago Bears, Atlanta Falcons, New York Jets, Oakland Raiders and San Francisco 49ers. When Marrone interviewed for a handful of jobs in 2013, he was offered the head-coaching position by the Bills and Browns and was a finalist with other teams when he agreed to coach the Bills.
Bills sources believe Marrone could have particular interest in the Jets, where he once served as offensive line coach for four years. Sources say the Jets will have strong interest in Marrone.


"I just found out Doug Marrone is available. We will look at him," owner Woody Johnson told The New York Daily News. "He is a coach who was with us. And I know him a little bit."


While it is believed Marrone would take some of his assistant coaches with him, most of them have contracts through 2015, according to a team source. Defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz's deal is believed to run through 2016.


Under Marrone, the Bills went 6-10 and 9-7 while struggling to find a quarterback. E.J. Manuel was a first-round pick in 2013 who suffered injuries and eventually was benched after Week 4 this season.


The Bills signed Kyle Orton late in preseason to take over the position. Orton announced his retirement this week. The team also traded its 2015 first-round pick to draft wide receiver Sammy Watkins with the fourth overall pick in the 2014 draft.


Marrone's decision to step down caught some players by surprise, coming after the Bills' first winning season since a 9-7 finish in 2004. Buffalo, however, missed the playoffs to extend the NFL's longest active postseason drought to 15 seasons.


"Surprised me. Didn't see it coming,'' center Eric Wood said in a text message to The Associated Press.


Starting safety Aaron Williams blasted Marrone in a tweet.

Aaron Williams @ajwilliams23 Follow
Lost all respect!! Completely pissed off, but not gonna let it ruin my New Years #Deuces #CantWait


Marrone was hired in Buffalo after four seasons at Syracuse, where Marrone helped revive his alma mater's struggling program.


On Monday, Marrone sidestepped a question about his future when asked whether he would consider opting out of his contract.


"I do not discuss my contract. That's my rule. I never have and never will,'' he said.


The Associated Press contributed to this report.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
49,223
Tokens
Jets are going to get lucky here. That guy had the Buffs moving in the right direction.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,652
Tokens
Punted on 4th and 1 at the 43 yard line up 8 in the 4th on Sunday

Marrone? more like MORON am I right?
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
49,223
Tokens
With 1:50 left in the game? Seems like a nobrainer to me. What would you have done?

I don't pretend to be an expert in Doug Marrone's in game coaching. I just know that in a tough Division he took last year's 6-10 team and improved them to 9-7 despite losing his number one running back midseason and benching his young starting QB for a guy who just retired from a very lackluster NFL career. Let's put it this way. That team played with attitude. Tough. I was very happy when Bellichik rested Gronk, Edelman, and a host of other Patriot players this past week. He never did that before despite being in this same Wk 17 situation several times before. You think that may have been a little nod of respect for how tough that Buffalo D played this season?

So how many NL coaches did better with their teams this year? Not many in my opinion.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,652
Tokens
With 1:50 left in the game? Seems like a nobrainer to me. What would you have done?

I don't pretend to be an expert in Doug Marrone's in game coaching. I just know that in a tough Division he took last year's 6-10 team and improved them to 9-7 despite losing his number one running back midseason and benching his young starting QB for a guy who just retired from a very lackluster NFL career. Let's put it this way. That team played with attitude. Tough. I was very happy when Bellichik rested Gronk, Edelman, and a host of other Patriot players this past week. He never did that before despite being in this same Wk 17 situation several times before. You think that may have been a little nod of respect for how tough that Buffalo D played this season?

So how many NL coaches did better with their teams this year? Not many in my opinion.

Nah there wasn't 1:50 left in the game, if there was 1:50 left then it is a no brainer to go for it. The equity in going for it is > than the expected 30 yard improvement in field position (since the other team needs a TD anyway, not FG)

There was like 10 minutes left when he did this. Your up 8, balls on the 43, 4th and 1....30-35 yards of field position isn't worth giving up the ball in that spot. You go for it and you come closer to making it a two score game.


I bet the Bills this game so was asking "WTF?" when they punted, only reason I brought it up. Other than that, no real criticism of him.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
49,223
Tokens
OK. I found it. 11:12 left in the game. Buff had just failed to gain an inch on 3rd and 1. Leading 17-9. Punt the ball. Make the opposition drive the length of the field to do what they have been unable to accomplish for the first three quarters and part of the 4th - score a TD. I believe in a coach showing confidence in his players. Tell your punter to pin them back. Challenge him to put the ball inside the 20. Challenge your special teams to get the ball downed. If executed properly you have the Pats working their offense from inside their goalline. Now challenge your Defense to go out and do their job. Good Defenses love to be working in that area of the field. That's a good Defense, the strength of that team. By the way, the eventual outcome supported his decision. Although the Pats started from their 17 yd line (could have been executed better) they eventually punted off a 4th and 21 from the Buff 41, after burning 6:26 from the clock. Marrone's decision to punt was validated.

I'd be asking "WTF" if he didn't punt in that situation.

Lots of teams out there could use that coach.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,652
Tokens
Yeah I believe in going for it on 4th and 1 from your oppositions 43 since you are likely to convert close to 3/4th of the time in that spot. The 72-73% chance you keep the ball which can lead to a score and further clock killing is greater than the advantage you gain in making them drive 84 yards instead of 57 yards.

Tough to change peoples thinking about these types of situations because some ideas are ingrained like "the eventual outcome supported his decision" or "Make them drive the length of the field" As if a short field and long field are miles apart when infact they are 30 yards.

Anyway here is a pretty decent writeup on 4th down theory.

http://archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com/2009/09/4th-down-study-part-1.html
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,998
Tokens
You don`t leave a job without 1 waiting for you...

Jets all the way....No doubt
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,652
Tokens
You don`t leave a job without 1 waiting for you...

Jets all the way....No doubt

Yeah unless Woody Johnson is losing it then I'm not sure why he would say it is good news that Marrone opted out.

Seems like a done deal
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,505
Tokens
OK. I found it. 11:12 left in the game. Buff had just failed to gain an inch on 3rd and 1. Leading 17-9. Punt the ball. Make the opposition drive the length of the field to do what they have been unable to accomplish for the first three quarters and part of the 4th - score a TD. I believe in a coach showing confidence in his players. Tell your punter to pin them back. Challenge him to put the ball inside the 20. Challenge your special teams to get the ball downed. If executed properly you have the Pats working their offense from inside their goalline. Now challenge your Defense to go out and do their job. Good Defenses love to be working in that area of the field. That's a good Defense, the strength of that team. By the way, the eventual outcome supported his decision. Although the Pats started from their 17 yd line (could have been executed better) they eventually punted off a 4th and 21 from the Buff 41, after burning 6:26 from the clock. Marrone's decision to punt was validated.

I'd be asking "WTF" if he didn't punt in that situation.

Lots of teams out there could use that coach.
thats a bunch of rah rah nonsense.
The math don't lie. Dumb move.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,652
Tokens
thats a bunch of rah rah nonsense.
The math don't lie. Dumb move.

Definitely.....when you really break down every decision a lot are close enough that you can't just blindly go by math and have to factor in the teams playing, the weather, flow of the game, etc

Marrone's decision does not remotely fall in that category though. Going for it is massively +EV in that spot.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Punted on 4th and 1 at the 43 yard line up 8 in the 4th on Sunday

Marrone? more like MORON am I right?

He is an idiot. When he coached Syracuse his team scored to go up 37-36 point with 6 seconds left in a game. Instead of taking a knee he went for 2 and the pass was an inch from being picked and returned for a 2-pointer the other way. No difference whether you lead by 1,2,or3 with that little time remaining, which escaped this fool's mind. Downgrade for the Jets.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,505
Tokens
Payton would have went for it. 100% positive
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
49,223
Tokens
You elitists crack me up. You know more than a guy who just coached a team to a 9-7 record in the NFL.

I have just spent some considerable time reading your link, PatsFan. Did you bother to read the counterarguments? Those guys disclosed the flaws in your argument far more eloquently than I could.

As for Mr Chop:

"Payton would have went for it. 100% positive"

From PatsFan's link:

"Nomination for worst 4th down decision of the year so far goes to Sean Payton for punting on 4th and 2 with 5 mins left in the game down by 10 lol"

I will stand by Marrone's decision in that situation, with that score, from that place on the field, in that quarter, with that much time left.
 
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
6,813
Tokens
I'm not going to pretend I know everything about Doug Marrone but what exactly makes him such a hot coaching commodity?

Syracuse did not exactly light the world on fire. In fact, they were horrible. Buffalo just halfway competed this year because they have a good defense.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,652
Tokens
That's cool you read the link. Most of the rebuttals aren't saying NFL coaches shouldn't be more aggressive, they are just saying all variables need to be considered. On average a more aggressive approach is correct, it doesn't mean it is ALWAYS correct. The article was also for ALL 4th downs

However where NFL coaches really should go for it significantly more is on 4th and 1, it is around a 70-75% proposition depending on the sample size you use. That zone in the 37-45 yard line where it is too far for a FG you pretty much should always go for it on 4th and 1 unless there are extenuating circumstances (The other team has a great D, your coach is Andy Reid and he'll F up the playcall, etc)

You read the piece so I won't get into expected points and all that but when you say you want to challenge the punter, the defense, etc. Why not just challenge the offense to get 1 measley yard and then if they don't do it your opponent is still 57 yards from the endzone. You can challenge the punter or special teams all you want but expectation is you are getting about 30 yards net. Is 30 yards net worth giving up a 3-1 fav that you can just keep the ball and are close to FG range?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,883
Messages
13,574,655
Members
100,880
Latest member
68gamebaiione
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com