No. I am saying the Tigers offense is not at full strength without Curtis and couple that with inflated lines, its not a good situation. Granderson is the catalyst, no reason to bet them as chalk till they get him back.Are you saying that the Tigers won't win one single game until Granderson comes back?
What if you bet them only once in the next 10 games, because you've capped it out and liked the play, and it wins? Detroit could go 1-9 in those 10 games, but you'd be 1-0 + however much you wagered. And what if the Tigers were -101 in that game?
Wouldn't you be costing yourself money if you DON'T bet the game that you liked? Seems like blindly ignoring a team could be costly.
Detroit at home -101, sure, sign me up. Not -165, which is my point. I am not interested in betting Detroit not at full strength and inflated to boot.What if you bet them only once in the next 10 games, because you've capped it out and liked the play, and it wins? Detroit could go 1-9 in those 10 games, but you'd be 1-0 + however much you wagered. And what if the Tigers were -101 in that game?
Wouldn't you be costing yourself money if you DON'T bet the game that you liked? Seems like blindly ignoring a team could be costly.
What if you bet on the Tigers tomorrow and they win? Would it then be worth bothering with them?