Donald Trump Still in the Lead After Debates:

Search

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
91,067
Tokens
<form action="/">If Donald Trump's comments about Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly are hurting his standing in the Republican primary, it's not showing in the numbers.

According to the latest NBC News Online Poll conducted by SurveyMonkey, Trump is at the top of the list of GOP candidates that Republican primary voters would cast a ballot for if the primary were being held right now.
</form>

The overnight poll was conducted for 24 hours from Friday evening into Saturday. During that period, Donald Trump stayed in the headlines due to his negative comments about Kelly and was dis-invited from a major conservative gathering in Atlanta.


None of that stopped Trump from coming in at the top of the poll with 23 percent. Sen. Ted Cruz was next on the list with 13 percent.

During the Fox News debate Thursday evening, Trump was the only Republican candidate to say he would not rule out a run as an independent candidate. According to this poll, that's just fine with over half of his supporters.

Fifty-four percent of Trump supporters said they would vote for him for president, even if he didn't win the GOP nomination. About one in five Trump supporters said they would switch and support the eventual Republican candidate.
The surprise result from the poll might have been businesswoman Carly Fiorina's performance. Twenty-two said she won the debate, besting Trump, Sen. Marco Rubio and Cruz.

In overall support, she came in fourth with eight percent of Republican primary voters saying they would support her in a primary or a caucus. This may not seem like a lot, but she had a gain in support of six points, which was the second highest in the poll.
Fiorina may have benefited from stepped up media coverage due to her performance in the so-called "Happy Hour" debate that aired on Thursday before the prime-time event.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
lol at Santorum now polling at 0%. Might be time to drop out. Big losers were Christie, Walker, and Bush.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens
The respect factor is slightly rising from the sports books
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
It's funny how Frank Luntz was trying to get Trumps supporters to split to Cruz. What they accomplished, was getting their sheep to go from Bush to Cruz. :):)
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,247
Tokens
You can love him or hate him,but at least he does not apologize when pressured,that is refreshing,he has no shot,i know,no one on earth can defeat Hillary,but I like the fact that he does not back down
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens
Betfair has him currently at less than 6% chance. Don't think any other book gives him close to that

There are several places that give him better odds
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens

New member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
219
Tokens
Cruz, Rubio, and Carly are solid. Don't see myself backing anyone else so far.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
Maybe Kasich.

I liked him to, but his poll numbers went down after the debates. I guy like him can't get past the social conservatives in a primary, but would win a national election.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens
I liked him to, but his poll numbers went down after the debates. I guy like him can't get past the social conservatives in a primary, but would win a national election.

And this is the problem of the republican party
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
Betfair has him currently at less than 6% chance. Don't think any other book gives him close to that
There are several places that give him better odds

No there isn't.

Offering 3 to 1 on him winning doesn't mean they think he has anything close to that sort of chance of winning unless they're also offering -400 on him not winning. And if by some chance there is, let us know and those of us with any intelligence will make as many max bets on that as possible.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens
I said he is less then 3 to 1 to win the nomination . Nothing more and nothing less.

And he is less then 3 to 1 and many places.

Try not to put words in my mouth next time.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,657
Tokens
You can love him or hate him,but at least he does not apologize when pressured,that is refreshing,he has no shot,i know,no one on earth can defeat Hillary,but I like the fact that he does not back down

Hilary? Sounds like a candidate from yesterday or something.

 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
The respect factor is slightly rising from the sports books

There are several places that give him better odds

I said he is less then 3 to 1 to win the nomination . Nothing more and nothing less.

And he is less then 3 to 1 and many places.

Try not to put words in my mouth next time.

So you're saying that there are several places that give him better odds than 6%, yet there is also no book that gives him enough respect to put up anything close to those odds?

I'm so confused.

Just tell me what the best odds are against him winning and if it is much better than his actual odds (somewhere around 1 to 5%) I'll bet it
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens
So you're saying that there are several places that give him better odds than 6%, yet there is also no book that gives him enough respect to put up anything close to those odds?

I'm so confused.

Just tell me what the best odds are against him winning and if it is much better than his actual odds (somewhere around 1 to 5%) I'll bet it

Who said anything about best odds against him.

I simply said Trump is
+300 or less at many sports books to win the nomination.

Then you start putting words in my mouth about odds against.

I said nothing about odds against in any of my post.

I made no implications on me thinking that because I said he was +300 that I thought it's a good bet or he had a great chance of winning.


I simply stated he is +300 or less and many places nothing more and nothing less which was nothing more then a backing of my original post which simply said the sports books are giving him slightly more respect lately then in the past. Which is a 100% factual statement
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
The respect factor is slightly rising from the sports books

There are several places that give him better odds

Then you start putting words in my mouth about odds against.

I said nothing about odds against in any of my post.

Unless the book offers a take-back, they are not giving any respect to him. And there are not several places giving him a better than 5-6% chance. And that is not putting words in your mouth
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,506
Tokens
Dude I said the respect factor is slightly rising.

When it was previously 50 to 1 and now it's 3 to 1

That means the respect factor is rising.


lol

wow
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
I simply stated he is +300 or less and many places nothing more and nothing less which was nothing more then a backing of my original post which simply said the sports books are giving him slightly more respect lately then in the past. Which is a 100% factual statement

Moving the odds from +2500/-5000 to +300/-5000 is not giving him slightly more respect.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,989
Messages
13,575,837
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com