Does this theory make any sense?

[Drunkn247]

Like with games today I look at Hamels and the phillies and Webb and the Dbacks as great plays but who wants to lay wood. So if I wanted to play the Braves today for instance instead of taking them straight just do a 3 team par with the Phils, Dbacks and Braves...then if I want the under in the Mets game parlay that with the Phils and the dbacks. Its like I would be keying on two games and mixing them up with 2 or 3 team parlays with my other straight bets

 

[Mr.Cover123]

Makes sense to me, but I wouldn't trust the Diamondbacks today with them struggling and Bergmann pitching well lately.

 

[Drunkn247]

I may just use Hamels and key it with a few games on 2 tm pars to get even money rather then lay juice

 

[Mr.Cover123]

I have the Phillies RL tonight. Of the games the Phillies have won with Hamels starting which is 8 and 6 in a row only 2 have been decided by 1 run. Phillies averaging 12 runs a game their past 5 games so I doubt it will be close tonight or the Marlins win outright.