Didn't Romo get a first down after the bad snap?

[cincy_]

He was definitely touched, the guy coming off the corner tackled him, they should have reviewed the play, but I'm almost positive nothing would have changed.

They still should have reviewed it.

 

[Wrigley]

ESPN just showed the play again he was not passed or on the yellow line

 

[royboy_3831]

They still should have reviewed it.

\

Yeah, that's why I said they should have reviewed the play...

 

[gynecologist]

Yeah he was short.. Was somewhat close though enough to at least merit a review..

 

[PokerKingJim]

He was clearly short

 

[FatTony]

They started at the 2. Case closed!

It was not!!!!! Tivo it. Just past the one.

Even if it was at the two it needs to be reviewed.

 

[cincy_]

\

Yeah, that's why I said they should have reviewed the play...

I know - I was agreeing with you.

 

[DonMelchor]

interesting question, but, no he did not have a 1st down

 

[ClubmanCoop]

funky disagree. The side replay showed it down maybe 1 1/4 line.
Then Sea snapped the ball at the 1...explain that.

<TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=bg2 id=home vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=home align=left colSpan=2>Seattle Seahawks at 01:14</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>1-10-SEA2</TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>(1:14) S.Alexander left tackle to SEA 22 for 20 yards (T.Parrish).</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>1-10-SEA22</TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>(1:05) M.Morris left tackle to SEA 21 for -1 yards (C.Canty).</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>2-11-SEA21</TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>(1:00) S.Alexander right tackle to SEA 21 for no gain (K.Coleman, A.Ayodele).</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>3-11-SEA21</TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>55) S.Alexander left end to SEA 29 for 8 yards (C.Canty).</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>4-3-SEA29</TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>08) (Punt formation)
PENALTY on SEA-R.Plackemeier, Delay of Game, 5 yards, enforced at SEA 29 - No Play.</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>4-8-SEA24</TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>07) R.Plackemeier punts 26 yards to 50, Center-D.Rackley, out of bounds.</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=away vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=away align=left colSpan=2>Dallas Cowboys at 00:02</TD></TR><TR class=bg2 id=play vAlign=center align=right height=17><TD class=bg3 align=left>1-10-50 </TD><TD class=bg3 align=left>02) (Shotgun) T.Romo pass incomplete deep middle to T.Owens (P.Hunter).



GoGo sais, I need a Drink :lol:
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

 

[RobFunk]

4-1-SEA9 (1:19) (Field Goal formation) T.Romo FUMBLES (Aborted) at SEA 9, and recovers at SEA 9. T.Romo to SEA 2 for 7 yards (J.Babineaux).

 

[royboy_3831]

I know - I was agreeing with you.

I know you know I knew I was agreeing with you...

 

[kermit16]

I thought the ball had came out before his knee hit.

Also, if he is not touched, it is as if his knee never hit.

I'm sure He went down by a tackle but man He landed close to the first down line. I thought He was perhaps short but very very close so why no review ? It wasn't ruled a fumble because they would have spotted the ball on the 3. How come they spotted the ball at the 1 yard line ... yet no review ?

 

[funkyc]

funky disagree. The side replay showed it down maybe 1 1/4 line.
Then Sea snapped the ball at the 1...explain that.

I really don't care where seattle snapped it. i watched in on tivo about 4 times. it wasnt a first down. i'm sure the guy in the booth did that in a second and realized he was down at the 2. btw, espn has showed it as well and again, clearly short

 

[Wrigley]

I'm sure He went down by a tackle but man He landed close to the first down line. I thought He was perhaps short but very very close so why no review ? It wasn't ruled a fumble because they would have spotted the ball on the 3. How come they spotted the ball at the 1 yard line ... yet no review ?

They spotted the ball at the 1.5 yd. line remember when the ref moved the ball back to the 1.5 yd. line when they reveiwed the Dallas first down.

So he would have had to get to the 1 for a first down he was not even close.

 

[LogansRun]

funky, I don't have tivo. Did Romo think he was going to score and stayed in second gear or did he actually hustle his ass around the corner?

 

[kermit16]

They spotted the ball at the 1.5 yd. line remember when the ref moved the ball back to the 1.5 yd. line when they reveiwed the Dallas first down
so he would have had to get to the 1 for a first down he was not even close.

I agree that I thought He was short but not by much .... review seemed in order. I actually thought as the play was going that Romo was going to score. Great tackle from behind won it for Seattle !

 

[Wrigley]

funky, I don't have tivo. Did Romo think he was going to score and stayed in second gear or did he actually hustle his ass around the corner?

I agree at first it look like Romo would score with no problem and then wham. He needs to turn it up a notch

 

[funkyc]

funky, I don't have tivo. Did Romo think he was going to score and stayed in second gear or did he actually hustle his ass around the corner?

i personally don't think he was hollywooding. i just dont think he's that quick. that dude dove before he could really get going full speed. he appeared to know the guy was closing on him

 

[gijoe]

his head hit the yellow line and he had the ball at his waist. not even close. if he extends the ball, well thats another story.everybody on tv isnt even talking about 1st down because they know it wasnt close

 

[Bennyshoe]

I thought Romo was running at full speed so i don't think he slowed down cause he thought he was going to cruise in