Typical coach speak. And the correct answer, contrary to popular belief, is Ryan Mallet. Team is going nowhere, and Hoyer is a proven nothing. Mallet at least has a gun, and natural talent a good Coach may be able to mold into a starting NFL QB. Hoyer is a backup, and always will be a backup
Typical coach speak. And the correct answer, contrary to popular belief, is Ryan Mallet. Team is going nowhere, and Hoyer is a proven nothing. Mallet at least has a gun, and natural talent a good Coach may be able to mold into a starting NFL QB. Hoyer is a backup, and always will be a backup
Are you watching what I'm watching? Mallet may be the worst QB in the NFL. I can't believe I gave 5 with that fricking bum.
C/ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | INT | SACKS | QBR | RTG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brian Hoyer | 24/31 | 312 | 10.1 | 2 | 1 | 0-0 | 90.0 | 116.6 |
Ryan Mallett | 7/10 | 50 | 5.0 | 0 | 1 | 1-0 | 48.3 | 41.7 |
TEAM | 31/41 | 362 | 8.8 | 2 | 2 | 1-0 | -- | 97.8 |
C/ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | INT | SACKS | QBR | RTG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brian Hoyer | 17/30 | 232 | 7.7 | 2 | 0 | 1-8 | 80.6 | 103.8 |
Ryan Mallett | 12/27 | 150 | 5.6 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 5.4 | 46.8 |
TEAM | 29/57 | 374 | 6.7 | 2 | 1 | 1-8 | -- | 76.8 |
Again, I'm not swayed by one game or 2 games. Hoyer has proven what he is. Houston isn't winning anything this year at 1-4, so go with the guy who "may" become something, rather than the guy who we know won't. What good does it do if Hoyer leads Houston to 5-6 wins, as opposed to Mallet, who may only lead them to 3, but may develop into the QB his arm talent shows he could be? I realize my view won't be shared by those who want immediate gratification, but a good Coach, who is there for the long term, would be about more than winning the next game. I suspect O'Brien will do what you want him to do.Back up or not... you need to put the Pipe down and view what each guy has done in the last 2 games.
Just tonight the "Back up" threw for over 300 yards and was 24/31 in less than 3qt
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG Brian Hoyer 24/31 312 10.1 2 1 0-0 90.0 116.6 Ryan Mallett 7/10 50 5.0 0 1 1-0 48.3 41.7 TEAM 31/41 362 8.8 2 2 1-0 -- 97.8
<tbody>
</tbody>
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG Brian Hoyer 17/30 232 7.7 2 0 1-8 80.6 103.8 Ryan Mallett 12/27 150 5.6 0 1 0-0 5.4 46.8 TEAM 29/57 374 6.7 2 1 1-8 -- 76.8
<tbody>
</tbody>
Career | 34 | 18 | 10-8-0 | 391 | 694 | 56.3 | 5025 | 22 | 3.2 | 20 | 2.9 | 81 | 7.2 | 6.6 | 12.9 | 147.8 | 77.8 | 41 | 293 | 6.44 | 5.81 | 5.6 | 5 | 5 |
Again, I'm not swayed by one game or 2 games. Hoyer has proven what he is. Houston isn't winning anything this year at 1-4, so go with the guy who "may" become something, rather than the guy who we know won't. What good does it do if Hoyer leads Houston to 5-6 wins, as opposed to Mallet, who may only lead them to 3, but may develop into the QB his arm talent shows he could be? I realize my view won't be shared by those who want immediate gratification, but a good Coach, who is there for the long term, would be about more than winning the next game. I suspect O'Brien will do what you want him to do.
You realize all of last week's Hoyer stats were in total garbage time, when they were down by 30+. Look, I agree, Hoyer gives them a better chance to win their next game. A Coach of a 1-4 team better be about more than winning his next game. And Hoyer has show what he is for his career in multiple places, multiple times. This is Brian Hoyer's career. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HoyeBr00.htm
Career 34 18 10-8-0 391 694 56.3 5025 22 3.2 20 2.9 81 7.2 6.6 12.9 147.8 77.8 41 293 6.44 5.81 5.6 5 5
<tbody>
</tbody>
Yeah, I'm not swayed by one game. I know what Hoyer is. A career backup. Mallet might not even be that, but I know he has awesome arm talent, and a team going nowhere like this year's Texans, should be about devlopement at this point. If Mallet proves he sucks, you are at the top of the draft, and can draft your next guy.