Democrats rejoice! John Boehner has done more for you than any Democrat EVER!

[SheriffJoe]

So far...

He's blocked the 'birther' investigation

He's blocked a Benghazi investigation

And now...

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/immigration-house-republicans-102884.html

Thanks to John Boehner, soon you will have 10 million more voters who don't share American values to help you create your 'Progressive' Utopia:

- lots of gun control (no more 2nd Amendment)
- abortion on demand
- higher taxes
- gay "marriage" (other perversions will follow)
- bigger welfare state for all those immigrants who will need it
- single payer healthcare
- "international law" usurping than Constitutional law
- massive anti-capitalist regulations
- Cap and Trade
- speech laws (no more 1st Amendment)
- media regulation

Did I miss anything?

That's right, those loony bin conservatives/libertarians you love to hate so much will be totally politically marginalized, just as you always dreamed and just as we totally deserve.

But don't worry, I'm pretty sure at least a few of those 10 million Mexicans will turn into the next Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.

Actually, come to think of it... who needs capitalism at all when the government will just invent everything. That's right, just 'invest' billions into government-funded "research" and America's standard of living will skyrocket, just like Obama advocated during his SOTU!

Thanks to John Boehner, The Great Progressive Liberal Utopia is finally within reach!

To a New America!

cheersgif

 

[akphidelt]

Too bad Obama can't be more like Big Government Keynesian Reagan. This economy would be booming!

 

[SheriffJoe]

How to Destroy America

In 2004, Richard D. Lamm, former governor of Colorado, addressed a conference sponsored by the Federation for American Immigration Reform in Washington. The following remarks are reprinted with his permission.

I have a secret plan to destroy America. If you believe, as many do, that America is too smug, too white bread, too self-satisfied, too rich, let’s destroy America.

It is not that hard to do. History shows that nations are more fragile than their citizens think. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and they all fall, and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” Here is my plan:

1. We must first make America a bilingual-bicultural country. History shows, in my opinion, that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. One scholar, Seymour Martin Lipset, put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon – all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with its Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”

​2. I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds.

3. We can make the United States a “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently, “The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved, not by tolerance, but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically, and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with a salad bowl metaphor. It is important to insure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences, rather than Americans emphasizing their similarities.

4. Having done all this, I would make our fastest-growing demographic group the least educated – I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50 percent dropout rate from school.

5. I would then get the big foundations and big business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of victimology. I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was all the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.

6. I would establish dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would “celebrate diversity.” “Diversity” is a wonderfully seductive word. It stresses differences rather than commonalities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other – that is, when they are not killing each other. A “diverse,” peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together, and we can take advantage of this myopia.Look at the ancient Greeks. Dorf’s “World History” tells us: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games in honor of Zeus, and all Greeks venerated the shrine of Apollo at Delphi. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet, all of these bonds together were not strong enough to overcome two factors … (local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions …)” If we can put the emphasis on the “pluribus,” instead of the “unum,” we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.

7. Then I would place all these subjects off-limits – make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to “heretic” in the 16th century – that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist”, “xenophobe” halt argument and conversation. Having made America a bilingual-bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of “victimology,” I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra – “because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good.” I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact.
8. Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson’s book “Mexifornia” – this book is dangerous; it exposes my plan to destroy America. So please, please – if you feel that America deserves to be destroyed – please, please – don’t buy this book! This guy is on to my plan.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” – Noam Chomsky, American linguist and U.S. media and foreign policy critic.

 

[carlspackler]

Disgrace is not a strong enough word.

 

[akphidelt]

What's funny is these psychos don't realize that if Boehner allows the nutjob birthers to get their way, the Republican party would be done for. I can't possibly imagine how brainwashed someone can be to believe that people want the government to act MORE conservative, lol. They tried the conservative route and let the government shut down over their hostage situation and it destroyed the Republican ratings. The more conservative the Republicans become the more they will get destroyed in general and state elections. Their only hope is their gerrymandering in which they get a small group of nutters that end up having a large say in politics. Absolutely sickening.

 

[guitarjosh]

Would anyone look back at the immigration laws we had prior to the 1930s and say that mass immigration was bad for America? If it wasn't then, it won't be now.

 

[Willie99]

Would anyone look back at the immigration laws we had prior to the 1930s and say that mass immigration was bad for America? If it wasn't then, it won't be now.

it's about illegal immigration, there's a world of difference

and in the 1930's, people came here to work. Now many come here to collect some sort of benefit

I'm an advocate for allowing immigrants in legally, more so than we presently do.

I also believe it's not plausible to deport 12 - 20 million illegals so we need to find a way to legitimize them, but all talk about immigration reform is 1,000 percent worthless until the borders are secure. No secured borders, no immigration reform. You don't perform a heart transplant while the patient is bleeding to death, it's a waste of time. First you have to stop the bleeding.

but the fucking morons in DC aren't capable of walking and chewing gum simultaneously, they're lost in the deep dense beltway fog.

PS: when we do legitimize productive illegal immigrants, they can't vote for at least 10 years, and not until they can speak English and become American citizens. (I'd suggest something about having a job too, but that won't go over well in libtardville)

 

[guitarjosh]

it's about illegal immigration, there's a world of difference

and in the 1930's, people came here to work. Now many come here to collect some sort of benefit

I'm an advocate for allowing immigrants in legally, more so than we presently do.

I also believe it's not plausible to deport 12 - 20 million illegals so we need to find a way to legitimize them, but all talk about immigration reform is 1,000 percent worthless until the borders are secure. No secured borders, no immigration reform. You don't perform a heart transplant while the patient is bleeding to death, it's a waste of time. First you have to stop the bleeding.

but the fucking morons in DC aren't capable of walking and chewing gum simultaneously, they're lost in the deep dense beltway fog.

PS: when we do legitimize productive illegal immigrants, they can't vote for at least 10 years, and not until they can speak English and become American citizens. (I'd suggest something about having a job too, but that won't go over well in libtardville)

If they come here to collect a benefit, that's a benefit problem not an immigration problem. The biggest reason to secure the boarder is to keep out violent criminals, but that will require working with foreign governments. If those two things are done, we could pretty much fix immigration in this country.

 

[Willie99]

so you're essentially for an open borders policy, only "violent criminals" are kept out, I'm not

 

[BleedingPurple]

What's funny is these psychos don't realize that if Boehner allows the nutjob birthers to get their way, the Republican party would be done for. I can't possibly imagine how brainwashed someone can be to believe that people want the government to act MORE conservative, lol. They tried the conservative route and let the government shut down over their hostage situation and it destroyed the Republican ratings. The more conservative the Republicans become the more they will get destroyed in general and state elections. Their only hope is their gerrymandering in which they get a small group of nutters that end up having a large say in politics. Absolutely sickening.

This..
Republicans continue to pass the "blame game" onto Obama and democrats. Well why the fuck doesn't the republican party buck up? Can't they get a legitimate candidate? I mean you dumb fuckers voted in Bush for 2 terms then come back with McCain (Palin) and Romney? What did you (they) think was going to happen? The world evolves, people evolve, it's time the republican party evolves. The country needs good republican and democrat leadership. The problem really is both sides suck and as akphidelt said the more conservative the republican party gets, the more people push away the party and stream to the left.

 

[guitarjosh]

so you're essentially for an open borders policy, only "violent criminals" are kept out, I'm not

Along with entitlement reform. Why wouldn't it work?

 

[BleedingPurple]

So far...

He's blocked the 'birther' investigation

He's blocked a Benghazi investigation

And now...

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/immigration-house-republicans-102884.html

Thanks to John Boehner, soon you will have 10 million more voters who don't share American values to help you create your 'Progressive' Utopia:

- lots of gun control (no more 2nd Amendment)
- abortion on demand
- higher taxes
- gay "marriage" (other perversions will follow)
- bigger welfare state for all those immigrants who will need it
- single payer healthcare
- "international law" usurping than Constitutional law
- massive anti-capitalist regulations
- Cap and Trade
- speech laws (no more 1st Amendment)
- media regulation

Did I miss anything?

That's right, those loony bin conservatives/libertarians you love to hate so much will be totally politically marginalized, just as you always dreamed and just as we totally deserve.

But don't worry, I'm pretty sure at least a few of those 10 million Mexicans will turn into the next Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.

Actually, come to think of it... who needs capitalism at all when the government will just invent everything. That's right, just 'invest' billions into government-funded "research" and America's standard of living will skyrocket, just like Obama advocated during his SOTU!

Thanks to John Boehner, The Great Progressive Liberal Utopia is finally within reach!

To a New America!

cheersgif

He blocked the birther investigation because he knew it was stupid. When you say "lots of gun control," what exactly do you mean? I am not having problem with the guns I own? I'm not a big fan of gun control but I understand it cause where does it stop? I mean maybe we should all own bazookas too? I should start a website Iwantabazooka.com and we can bitch and moan about gun rights until we all have the ability to own one. Taxes get higher, they should be higher for the ultra rich and we should of been taxed higher during the Bush years, starts two wars, deregulates the housing market and then CUTS Taxes. Gay marriage, why should you care? Does gay marriage really effect your or my rights? It's classic, neocons bitching about less government but when it comes to marriage it should be "more government control." They should tell you who can get married, in this day and age there are far more concerns than gay marriage. Even republicans are coming around to it because some have had sons come out gay of late and they know they can never win without supporting it. The Democrats are thought of giving to the poor, do you know that the traditionally republican states sucks more off the federal tit than the Democrat states. You sound like the typical rallying cry for most republican candidates, what is EVERY YEAR, "They took Our Guns." "Marriage is defined between one woman and one man." "Abortion isn't right." "Look at all the illegals!" The banter is old and tired, and the country has pretty much moved on from the jargon, it's time the republican do to and put their strength and efforts towards other agendas cause as a country we need it.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Would anyone look back at the immigration laws we had prior to the 1930s and say that mass immigration was bad for America? If it wasn't then, it won't be now.

Lyndon Johnson's 1965 Immigration Act was probably one of the most destructive pieces of legislation ever created.

It changed the face of America forever - for the worst.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Along with entitlement reform. Why wouldn't it work?

Because you're legalizing people who will vote for more entitlements and bigger government not less and are therefore committing national suicide.

IF you could first get rid of the welfare state and ensure it could never be "voted back in" (impossible, Democrats simply ignore any and all laws when it comes to advancing their radical ideology), then yes, theoretically you're right, immigration policies could be a lot more open.

"You can have open borders or you can have a welfare state, but you can't have both"
- Milton Friedman

 

[akphidelt]

This..
Republicans continue to pass the "blame game" onto Obama and democrats. Well why the fuck doesn't the republican party buck up? Can't they get a legitimate candidate? I mean you dumb fuckers voted in Bush for 2 terms then come back with McCain (Palin) and Romney? What did you (they) think was going to happen? The world evolves, people evolve, it's time the republican party evolves. The country needs good republican and democrat leadership. The problem really is both sides suck and as akphidelt said the more conservative the republican party gets, the more people push away the party and stream to the left.

Majority of the people on this forum are real life nutters. They honestly believe that they are losing elections because their candidate isn't conservative enough. It's hilarious considering the fact that the "conservative" candidates get absolutely destroyed in the Republican primaries. But they somehow imagine that if Republicans voted them in, more people would show up to vote in a crazy anti-gay, anti-abortion, birther loon. Just retarded people here.

 

[SheriffJoe]

"According to estimates from those who were in the room--both in favor of moving forward and against--the dozens of GOP lawmakers who spoke were at least 80-20 against bringing a bill to the floor this year. There is a palpable sense of disappointment among those interested in moving forward. In private conversations, the word that is used is that the meeting was "predictable." The same people in the GOP conference who kept Boehner from moving on a bill in 2013 are just as opposed in 2014.

Immigration hawks, meanwhile, sense they scored a major victory.

"I don't understand why House leadership would bring this issue up now," Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina (R) tells me, adding, "After yesterday, that feeling is strengthened based on the overwhelming pushback from Conference meeting attendees."

Sounds like they tore Boehner to shreds!

Good! Crybaby must be drowning in his booze tonight! lol

 

[BleedingPurple]

Majority of the people on this forum are real life nutters. They honestly believe that they are losing elections because their candidate isn't conservative enough. It's hilarious considering the fact that the "conservative" candidates get absolutely destroyed in the Republican primaries. But they somehow imagine that if Republicans voted them in, more people would show up to vote in a crazy anti-gay, anti-abortion, birther loon. Just retarded people here.

Exactly, same as the other site. amazingly posters from Eastern Texas want republicans to be MORE conservative and they think that is going to win? People need to learn. One thing that pisses me off about the far right is that they bitch about Obama and "more government." Yet they are hypocritical cause they want government to control abortion, marriage, etc.. I have voted republican, I like Tommy Thompson when he was governor of WI but for me seems like repubs like Romney would stomp on a homeless person to take the $5 he panhandled. I get that the country should be economically more conservative but not over the rights of people and constantly giving to the rich. Republican party needs to show more compassion or it's going to die. I see the author of the thread didn;t respond to me

 

[akphidelt]

Exactly, same as the other site. amazingly posters from Eastern Texas want republicans to be MORE conservative and they think that is going to win? People need to learn. One thing that pisses me off about the far right is that they bitch about Obama and "more government." Yet they are hypocritical cause they want government to control abortion, marriage, etc.. I have voted republican, I like Tommy Thompson when he was governor of WI but for me seems like repubs like Romney would stomp on a homeless person to take the $5 he panhandled. I get that the country should be economically more conservative but not over the rights of people and constantly giving to the rich. Republican party needs to show more compassion or it's going to die. I see the author of the thread didn;t respond to me

Even Bob Dole came out and said the Republican party needs to close up shop for a year and develop a new positive strategy. He even said Reagan wouldn't make it in todays Repubilcan party which is very true. The media has the Republican party by the balls. Look at Chris Christie, he shook Obama's hand thanking him for hurricane relief and he was immediately banned from the conservative cult. I'm fine with a lot of conservative beliefs, but the current Republican party resembles the 19th century Southern Confederates. Like real life Bible Belt nutters. Just a horrible time in politics, and the sad thing is, the majority of the country doesn't want what the conservatives want. But because they have gerrymandered their way in to the House, they have the ability to stifle and obstruct anything the government can do. It's a sickening time in politics.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Republicans control 9 more states than Democrats and are poised to make even greater gains in 2014:

Most Americans want nothing to do with fringe commie Democrat policies at the federal or state level.

Dole, McCain, Romney...all predictable RINO losers.

Nominate a true conservative and the "red vs blue" electoral map goes out the window.

 

[vitterd]

Republicans control 9 more states than Democrats and are poised to make even greater gains in 2014:

Most Americans want nothing to do with fringe commie Democrat policies at the federal or state level.

Dole, McCain, Romney...all predictable RINO losers.

Nominate a true conservative and the red vs blue electoral map goes out the window.

Nah Joe....repscumlicans did a disgraceful job of redistricting to keep some of the local nuts from ever losing. A more conservative candidate will not win nation wide.....just isnt possible.