Cowboys/giants discussion

[Moneyline_Monster]

Can this game get any more F'n dramatic, beef between Romo, T.O. and Witten, No Brandon Jacobs, Playoffs on the line. Tell me who you got!

Cowboys 27
Giants 20

 

[JETE]

Giants by 4

 

[709]

Drama:Mark Witten drops a very sure TD pass from Romo in the end zone with the clock ran out, while TO screaming wide open at the other corner. GMen 24-20

 

[Moneyline_Monster]

Mark Witten can drop a pass, as long as Jason Witten doesn't.

 

[seanm0520]

Also like the G-Men in this spot. Romo, in my opinion, is going to attempt to force even MORE passes to keep all happy and it will be a 2 or 3 INT game. I also doubt NY is going to let Barber do what Westbrook did last weekend.

Giants - 21
Cowboys - 17

 

[oldmanTED]

The New York Giants have ruled out halfback Brandon Jacobs for Sunday's game against the Dallas Cowboys.
Jacobs has not practiced all week because of his knee injury, which has been bothering him for about a month.
"We just don't think he will be ready," coach Tom Coughlin said after practice on Friday.
Wide receiver Domenik Hixon, the starting replacement for Plaxico Burress, is questionable, and the Giants won't know until game time whether he will be able to play.
Jacobs leads the Giants with 1,002 yards rushing and 12 touchdowns. He will be replaced in the starting lineup by Derrick Ward.
Ahmad Bradshaw and second-year pro Danny Ware, who has never carried the ball in an NFL game, will back him up.
John Clayton is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

<!-- end story body -->

<!-- / message -->

 

[coreystreet]

21 - 17 giants

 

[Moneyline_Monster]

Don't take this the wrong way guys, but I really enjoy seeing you all on the Giants, because I'm on the Boys this weekend.

ML
<TABLE id=gridtable><TBODY><TR id=e148844 ondblclick=highlightRow(this) style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #e2e2e2" onclick="testHit('e148844', event)"><TD id=score width=50>12/14
8:15P
</TD><TD id=team width=135>329 New York Giants
330 Dallas Cowboys
</TD><TD id=bets width=45>18192
</TD><TD id=spreadpct style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ccff66" width=40>63%
37%
</TD><TD id=mlpct style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ccff66" width=40>63%
37%
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

That's what it's looking like. Not only does the public love the Giants, they love the ML too. I'm hoping the line drops, but I'm seeing absolutely no movement. Hoping for -2.5.

 

[Moneyline_Monster]

BTW the percentage on the Giants was a tad higher, I guess the subtraction of Jacobs and possible subtraction of Hixon added more Cowboy money.

 

[seanm0520]

That's just my lean, I'm not actually betting this line. I think it's too close on either side. There's much better value to be had elsewhere, IMO.

 

[boyzfan]

i'm a huge cowboy fan. and when i saw this line i was shocked. i've been watching the boys play my whole life and watch quite a bit of football and been laying wagers for a long time. imho i think the wrong team is favored and i thought this before the cancer in the lockerr room known as t.o. i don't bet on cowboy games very often because i bet with my heart and not my head. my head is telling me giants win this game out right.

 

[uscmd]

I think Dal is imploding like a super nova. Owner calls star rb a pansy, TO is malignant, and his bs is splitting the team. Romo is one or two meltdowns away from becoming Tony "Oh no," for the foreseeable future.
This team has championship talent yet has the same number of W's as Min or Den.

I have the giants ml, +3.

instead of coming out strong and knocking the snot out of the giants Romo's going to hesitate, "how many balls has Jason got? How many to TO?" NY scores more (~4 pts per; 28.2 - 24) and allows fewer (~4 pts per; 17.4 - 21.5 ).

Giants win su.

The most disturbing thing about Dal, TO really believes hes being conspired against, and no idea whatsoever how damaging his crap is. Its just like the guy thats a player, who bad mouths every ex, extols the virtue of every new sweetie, and has no idea how his stuff sours relationship after relationship.

bol,

 

[joesixpack88]

very interesting game with all the recent drama surrounding both teams. i think the giants will be the ones that are focused since their drama was 2 weeks ago and already cost them a game.

 

[Moneyline_Monster]

Ok, I know I'm on the Cowboys as a side, and I'm not Steve Budin (sarcasm), BUT WHY IS EVERYONE AND THEIR GRANDMOTHER, and niece, on the NY Giants. IF this game was so clear cut why hasn't the number gone down? Is this game as easy as everybody thinks, because other than myself I haven't seen another soul on the Boys.

 

[GE4511]

I actually think the under might be the best play here

 

[sonnycam]

Ok, I know I'm on the Cowboys as a side, and I'm not Steve Budin (sarcasm), BUT WHY IS EVERYONE AND THEIR GRANDMOTHER, and niece, on the NY Giants. IF this game was so clear cut why hasn't the number gone down? Is this game as easy as everybody thinks, because other than myself I haven't seen another soul on the Boys.

boys play like crap in december; they have a losing record for december. Win or lose, NYG is a good play. Hopefully, Manning is not going to be crappy last week

 

[Jman20427]

IMO Good game to tease if you have a 2nd bet. G-Men +9, 9.5 ..cant see the boys winning by more then a score. While the Giants O is a little banged up, their D is pretty healthy!

 

[Jman20427]

That's just my lean, I'm not actually betting this line. I think it's too close on either side. There's much better value to be had elsewhere, IMO.

hahaha sean, just saw your avy. I believe NAS said it best.."You lose money chasing women, never lose women chasing money!"