Sports Insights' contrarian betting strategy for Week 2 of the NFL
David Solar
ESPN Staff Writer
ESPN INSIDER
After one week of NFL action, the contrarian approach continues to provide profitable results for bettors. Last week's system matches were 2-1 against the spread (ATS), which pushes the record to 27-20 ATS (57.4 percent) since the inception of this article last year.
As I have previously explained, the goal of this column it to extract value by capitalizing on market overreactions and exploiting artificially inflated lines created by public perception and betting habits.
Since the start of the 2003 season, a majority of spread bets have been placed on the favorite in more than 81 percent of all regular season games. Oddsmakers understand this tendency and shade their lines to account for the inevitable influx of public money on the chalk. These shaded lines have created additional value on the underdog.
Over the past 13 seasons, underdogs have covered at a <offer style="box-sizing: border-box;"></offer>50.5 percent rate. Large underdogs have been particularly profitable with 'dogs of at least three points covering at a 50.9 percent rate, 'dogs of at least seven points covering at a 52 percent rate, and 'dogs of at least 10 points cover at a 54 percent rate.
Casual bettors tend to overvalue home-field advantage, which has created additional value on visitors. There has been a general consensus that home-field advantage is worth around three points to the spread, although the figure varies based on venue. My research found that home teams have won by an average of 2.56 points/game, which seems to disprove this widely held notion.
There is also a large segment of the betting population that believes that home-field advantage is heightened in divisional rivalries since the excitement of playing a familiar rival leads to louder, more raucous crowds. That assessment is patently false. Visitors have been tremendously undervalued in divisional games, especially road underdogs in low-scoring games.
In a recent article on the Sports Insights blog, I found that the average combined score during the 2015-16 season was 45.46. Using that as the starting point, I defined "low scoring" as any game with a closing total of 45.5 or less.
<aside class="inline inline-table" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: BentonSans, -apple-system, Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 221, 223); clear: both; margin: 6px 0px 18px; padding: 15px; width: 565px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;">
David Solar
ESPN Staff Writer
ESPN INSIDER
After one week of NFL action, the contrarian approach continues to provide profitable results for bettors. Last week's system matches were 2-1 against the spread (ATS), which pushes the record to 27-20 ATS (57.4 percent) since the inception of this article last year.
As I have previously explained, the goal of this column it to extract value by capitalizing on market overreactions and exploiting artificially inflated lines created by public perception and betting habits.
Since the start of the 2003 season, a majority of spread bets have been placed on the favorite in more than 81 percent of all regular season games. Oddsmakers understand this tendency and shade their lines to account for the inevitable influx of public money on the chalk. These shaded lines have created additional value on the underdog.
Over the past 13 seasons, underdogs have covered at a <offer style="box-sizing: border-box;"></offer>50.5 percent rate. Large underdogs have been particularly profitable with 'dogs of at least three points covering at a 50.9 percent rate, 'dogs of at least seven points covering at a 52 percent rate, and 'dogs of at least 10 points cover at a 54 percent rate.
Casual bettors tend to overvalue home-field advantage, which has created additional value on visitors. There has been a general consensus that home-field advantage is worth around three points to the spread, although the figure varies based on venue. My research found that home teams have won by an average of 2.56 points/game, which seems to disprove this widely held notion.
There is also a large segment of the betting population that believes that home-field advantage is heightened in divisional rivalries since the excitement of playing a familiar rival leads to louder, more raucous crowds. That assessment is patently false. Visitors have been tremendously undervalued in divisional games, especially road underdogs in low-scoring games.
In a recent article on the Sports Insights blog, I found that the average combined score during the 2015-16 season was 45.46. Using that as the starting point, I defined "low scoring" as any game with a closing total of 45.5 or less.
<aside class="inline inline-table" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: BentonSans, -apple-system, Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; border: 1px solid rgb(220, 221, 223); clear: both; margin: 6px 0px 18px; padding: 15px; width: 565px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;">
CRITERIA | ATS RECORD | UNITS WON | ROI |
---|---|---|---|
Underdog | 1,634-1,603 (50.5 percent) | -43.78 | -1.4 percent |
Road Underdog | 1,108-1,046 (51.4 percent) | +11.21 | +0.5 percent |
Road Underdog, Divisional Game | 426-359 (54.3 percent) | +46.31 | +5.9 percent |
Road Underdog, Divisional Game, O/U <46 | 318-253 (55.7 percent) | +50.38 | +8.8 percent |