Colts/Jags Skins/Ariz All 4 teams winners

[kermit16]

Anyone who had any of these 4 teams should be cashing their winners. Colts was readily available earlier in week at 7 1/2 and Jags was available for + 9 1/2. Skins was available for - 3 1/2 and Cards was available for + 4 1/2. Also it was very cheap to buy Dallas to 2 1/2 which I did for - 117. Great week for shopping to get the best line ! Hope you all did well this week !:toast:

 

[Journeyman]

Did the KC/DAL number move at all , off the 3?

 

[kermit16]

Did the KC/DAL number move at all , off the 3?

Some people would say " No ". I would say it did because Dallas was -3 +103.
To me that is an automatic buy to - 21/2 for - 117. Cheap buy off and onto 3 has been proven to be a winner over the years

 

[Journeyman]

Some people would say " No ". I would say it did because Dallas was -3 +103.
To me that is an automatic buy to - 21/2 for - 117. Cheap buy off and onto 3 has been proven to be a winner over the years

exactly what I was thinking

 

[kermit16]

exactly what I was thinking

All I know is that it is on my W list ! :lolBIG:

 

[REDEYE]

I got the + 4 1/2 with Az on the free half point

 

[beetman]

Not necessarily. I had DAL -3 +107 which was superior to any -2.5 line I saw (like you, the best I saw was -117). I also took AZ +3.5 +100 instead of +4 -110. The only +4.5's I saw were on books that no longer take my action and +3.5 +100 is about the same as +4.5 -113, so the line I got was only a little bit worse than the best line I saw. (Of course in the games where I got great lines, MIA +14 and PHI +10, I wasn't even close to needing the extra points.)

I understand the point you're making but with the variety of ways that books shade juice you can't really make blanket statements like "All bettors on team X should have won" when the line lands close to the number. I read a thread on another message board where someone mentioned betting JAX +8 +107, which is superior to +9.5 -110.