He is correct. No hypotheticals here. IF Manning continues at the pace thus far, then the Colts are the best. Facts are facts and Pollard just spoke them. Time will tell.
Go Horse
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Last Sunday, after Indianapolis went a second consecutive playoff game without punting, Colts tight end Marcus Pollard said, "If we keep playing like this, then you can just go ahead and hand us the [Super Bowl] rings."
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Go Horse
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Last Sunday, after Indianapolis went a second consecutive playoff game without punting, Colts tight end Marcus Pollard said, "If we keep playing like this, then you can just go ahead and hand us the [Super Bowl] rings."
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by -=Scorpion=-:
Man, there are just too many dumb squares in these forums!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I am a professional gambler who i can document plays at least 10k per game. feel free to contact hollywood, cris, and several others. You can feel free to corroborate this with those outs. I tend to disagree with your opinion on this being a square subject. Am I a square for thinking this is a relevant thread? I don't think so. I believe that every gambler, especially the pros delve as deeply as they can in to the psychology of a given game. If team A is going in complacent and cocky and a pro knows it, ( despite any power rating he may have), the professional wants to know about it, and may increase or decrease his postion depending on how the information affected his play. Scorpion, i think you need to rethink exactly what constitutes square discussion.
Man, there are just too many dumb squares in these forums!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I am a professional gambler who i can document plays at least 10k per game. feel free to contact hollywood, cris, and several others. You can feel free to corroborate this with those outs. I tend to disagree with your opinion on this being a square subject. Am I a square for thinking this is a relevant thread? I don't think so. I believe that every gambler, especially the pros delve as deeply as they can in to the psychology of a given game. If team A is going in complacent and cocky and a pro knows it, ( despite any power rating he may have), the professional wants to know about it, and may increase or decrease his postion depending on how the information affected his play. Scorpion, i think you need to rethink exactly what constitutes square discussion.
