***** College Football Goy Play *****

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
I quit betting college over a month ago after losing my 6k profits, wasn't comfortable with college at all until this game.

Thursday night:


UCLA +12 (-110)........(GOY).......X-Large str wagers are 2k plays, this is twice as much.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
511
Tokens
I quit betting college over a month ago after losing my 6k profits, wasn't comfortable with college at all until this game.

Thursday night:


UCLA +12 (-110)........(GOY).......X-Large str wagers are 2k plays, this is twice as much.

I like the pick. Any insight as to what makes it the GOY pick?
 

lets do this!
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
1,639
Tokens
Your going against Conan the West Coast specialist may the best man win!
 

We see the light
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
2,587
Tokens
Buffs is 8-0 ATS this year. They've been outperformed oddsmaker by a mile.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
2,564
Tokens
C.U. alum and there hasn't been this much enthusiasm for the football program since Colorado was ranked number two in the nation under Gary Barnett in 2001. This is MacIntyre's 4th year as coach and now playing with many of the players he has recruited. Not knocking your pick but this game features one of college football's biggest surprises vs. arguably one of it's biggest disappointments. UCLA hasn't defeated anyone with a winning record and will very likely finish with a losing record and be Mora's adios. Colorado has a decent chance of running the table and going 10-2. Buffs are the only division I team with a perfect ats ... 8-0.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
1,199
Tokens
Please, CG, could you give us some insight into what makes this a GOY. The Bruins are really floundering. Thanks and good luck.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
17,245
Tokens
C.U. alum and there hasn't been this much enthusiasm for the football program since Colorado was ranked number two in the nation under Gary Barnett in 2001. This is MacIntyre's 4th year as coach and now playing with many of the players he has recruited. Not knocking your pick but this game features one of college football's biggest surprises vs. arguably one of it's biggest disappointments. UCLA hasn't defeated anyone with a winning record and will very likely finish with a losing record and be Mora's adios. Colorado has a decent chance of running the table and going 10-2. Buffs are the only division I team with a perfect ats ... 8-0.

Out of 128 FBS schools, he picks the 119th team to cover against the numero uno team: http://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/ncf/statistics/2016-2017/ats.html WOOOOOOOOOOOW!!!

~T~
 

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
2,303
Tokens
Made same post in Conan's thread:


Is Colorado 5 points better than Wazzu on a nuetral field?

Is Colorado 9.5 points better than Utah on a nuetral?

That is what Colorado -12 is implying assuming home field is worth standard 3.

I certainly understand other things are factored into the line other than straight power rating but this is as good a starting point as any. Let's not pretend they're dreadful with Faufal in the lineup. They're 1-1 ATS against 2 top 25 teams.

This is is not an argument for UCLA, just a starting point to assess line value.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
17,245
Tokens
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah Dude, see what you're looking at. They haven't been beaten by more than 9 this season. My bad men, I'm seeing some 13 (Arrrrgh) out there now, I can't argue with this play.

~T~
 

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
2,303
Tokens
C.U. alum and there hasn't been this much enthusiasm for the football program since Colorado was ranked number two in the nation under Gary Barnett in 2001. This is MacIntyre's 4th year as coach and now playing with many of the players he has recruited. Not knocking your pick but this game features one of college football's biggest surprises vs. arguably one of it's biggest disappointments. UCLA hasn't defeated anyone with a winning record and will very likely finish with a losing record and be Mora's adios. Colorado has a decent chance of running the table and going 10-2. Buffs are the only division I team with a perfect ats ... 8-0.

All reasons why the line is -12, not why Colorado covers it.
 

We see the light
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
2,587
Tokens
All reasons why the line is -12, not why Colorado covers it.

See my comment above.... Colorado has been outperformed oddsmaker numbers thia year...they have no choice but adjust. Maybe they had been undervalued thus far.
Would we say the same if/had they won both games where their QB couldn't finish. Let's not forget they were leading Michigan when he went down.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
2,303
Tokens
See my comment above.... Colorado has been outperformed oddsmaker numbers thia year...they have no choice but adjust. Maybe they had been undervalued thus far.
Would we say the same if/had they won both games where their QB couldn't finish. Let's not forget they were leading Michigan when he went down.

You're not even making a clear argument. Are you saying they're still undervalued at -12? Or is the line right? There's no value laying -110 into a line you feel splits the results 50/50.
 

We see the light
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
2,587
Tokens
Can't be much clearer than that...y'all valued Colorado as top 25 team. Wash st is 25, Utah is 16... Oddsmakers think a healthy Colorado team is top 10. When will you adjust the line... 8 games is not enough? Wait until they kick your butt 12-0???
What would the spread be for #3 Michigan vs. UCLA at home? I'm sure its near 3 td
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,520
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com