Clinton pledges to boost foreign aid

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
So let me get this straight. Here we are on the brink of an economic collapse. Yes a collapse. And here we have the Beast actually talking about spending more money we don't have ( did i mention RECORD deficits that will be approaching 1.5 trillion this year) on foreign countries... or you know the same people who finance our debt. In fact finance so much of our debt it has increased 500% the last 15 years. Again... we are now approaching a trillion dollar annual trade deficit and here we are going to continue to borrow to pay off other countries to be nice and behave like civilized animals because we are living way beyond our means at EVERY level of american society? How is this not extortion? Oh yhea, its because we actually think this is sound policy....

avatar49.gif


debt-foreign-share.gif



WASHINGTON – Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton pledged Friday to overhaul U.S. foreign aid programs to increase assistance and give civilians a greater role in its delivery. But she warned that selling the public on the idea would be hard in troubled economic times.

"I believe in development and I believe with all my heart that it truly is an equal partner along with defense and diplomacy" in advancing foreign policy goals, she told a crowd of several thousand employees of the U.S. Agency for International Development at the agency's headquarters.An advocate of what she calls "smart power" — combining diplomatic efforts with aid projects to promote democracy and improve America's image abroad — Clinton assured her audience that she would be making the case to give them greater authority and resources that during the Bush administration had largely shifted to the military.

"It is essential that the role of USAID and our other foreign assistance programs be strengthened, be adequately funded and be coordinated in a way that makes abundantly clear that the United States understands and supports development assistance," she said."I want to know from you what we need to do to make sure that USAID assumes once again the global leadership role you deserve it to have in the delivery of (aid)," Clinton said.
There has been great concern among aid and relief organizations that the United States has over the past eight years transferred much of the responsibility for foreign assistance to the military, particularly reconstruction programs in Iraq and Afghanistan. Clinton pledged she would "make sure that USAID assumes once again the global leadership role you deserve it to have" but stressed that to do that the agency would have to produce results "to regain the authorities and the resources that have drifted elsewhere."

At the same time, she delivered a firm note of caution that convincing Americans of the importance of foreign assistance during the worst recession since the Great Depression would be difficult."We have to be able to make the case that what you do for America is important even in these tough times," she said. "I believe we can make that case. But it can't be just a speech from me, it has to be the accumulated efforts of every one of you, that will enable me to make the case, not just to our Congress and not just to the White House, but to the American people."

:hump: :hump:
 

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
357
Tokens

<!-- Rendering: component: --> <!-- blog text start --> December 14, 2008
feature-world-flags.jpg

Who Gets U.S. Foreign Aid
The U.S. will give an estimated $26 billion in foreign aid in 2008—70% more than when President George W. Bush took office (the figure doesn’t include funds related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan). More than 150 countries get financial assistance from the U.S. Here are the six that received the most this year.

<table style="font-size: 14px;" summary="" class="tableTD" width="599" border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="10"> <tbody> <tr> <td valign="bottom" width="110" align="left"> COUNTRY </td> <td valign="bottom" width="90" align="left"> AID </td> <td valign="bottom" align="left"> PURPOSE </td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 1. Israel </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$2.4 billion</td> <td valign="top" align="left">Virtually all of this money is used to buy weapons (up to 75% made in the U.S.). Beginning in 2009, the U.S. plans to give $30 billion over 10 years.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 2. Egypt </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$1.7 billion</td> <td valign="top" align="left">$1.3 billion to buy weapons; $103 million for education; $74 million for health care; $45 million to promote civic participation and human rights.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 3. Pakistan </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$798 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left">$330 million for security efforts, including military-equipment upgrades and border security; $20 million for infrastructure.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 4. Jordan </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$688 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left">$326 million to fight terrorism and promote regional stability through equipment upgrades and training; $163 million cash payment to the Jordanian government.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 5. Kenya </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$586 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left">$501 million to fight HIV/AIDS through drug treatment and abstinence education and to combat malaria; $15 million for agricultural development; $5.4 million for programs that promote government accountability.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 6. South Africa </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$574 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left">$557 million to fight TB and HIV/AIDS; $3 million for education.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 7. Mexico </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$551 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left"> Click here for details.
</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 8. Colombia </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$541 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left"> Click here for details.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 9. Nigeria </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$491 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left"> Click here for details.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> 10. Sudan </td> <td valign="top" align="left">$479 million</td> <td valign="top" align="left"> Click here for details.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
*Source: Estimates based on figures and documents from the U.S. Department of State. Click here for more information.

— Rebecca Davis O'Brien

http://www.parade.com/news/intelligence-report/archive/who-gets-us-foreign-aid.html
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
At the same time, she delivered a firm note of caution that convincing Americans of the importance of foreign assistance during the worst recession since the Great Depression would be difficult."We have to be able to make the case that what you do for America is important even in these tough times," she said. "I believe we can make that case. But it can't be just a speech from me, it has to be the accumulated efforts of every one of you, that will enable me to make the case, not just to our Congress and not just to the White House, but to the American people."

:hump: :hump:

of course. another democratic notion that giving to others while our own people suffer will help. and the aide we give to other countries will help their people quicker than any package our representatives pass for our own people. both parties are responsible here. however, fuck hillary. i guarantee she will get 3 times the face and press time than any secretary of state in our history. the clinton machine is a beast and President Obama is at its mercy.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
In actuality SD the Republicans are the ones with a history of sending and spending money overseas.
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
In actuality SD the Republicans are the ones with a history of sending and spending money overseas.

i won't pretend to understand the first thing about how much or why we spend so much overseas as i am not educated enough to make a good debate about the subject. there are tons of people who suffer and we should help where we can. however, we should always put our own people first, and right now -- and i'm sure President Bush did the same thing and is why i said both parties were guilty -- i don't like the idea of sending money abroad for new shit while our own citizens continue to suffer. if i'm wrong enlighten me. but i don't like hillary. she needs to do a little more than talk. of course it's not been a week yet. but i've always had this negative vibe about her. bill's pretty cool though.

God bless the U.S. no matter who's in charge. we can argue and debate, but may our elected officials always put the American people first regardless of politics.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
I think your key phrase is "I dont like Hillary". Wait for further information. But history says that democratic overseas spending will be less.
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
I think your key phrase is "I dont like Hillary". Wait for further information. But history says that democratic overseas spending will be less.

i don't know, you're probably right, but after hillary's "i dodged bullets in bosnia" statement turned out to be a bunch of shit, i just don't trust her in these matters. but like you said, i'm willing to wait on history. i mean, what choice do i have? in the mean time i'll remain skeptical and hope for the best.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,945
Messages
13,575,469
Members
100,884
Latest member
68gamebaitools
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com