Cleveland has lost 8 straight and 12 of 13. McInnis was injured during most of these games. Even if he did play, he wasn't 100%. The Cavs REALLY need McInnis. Compare their record with McInnis vs without McInnis.
Plus, Eric Williams was recently placed on the IL. Williams isn't a star, but he was a dependable veteran starter who did the little things.
With the Williams/McInnis injuries, the Cavs have been scrambling to find a decent rotation. Recent starters have included Mateen Cleeves, Lee Nailon, Ira Newble. Cleeves was then released after a 10-day contract. Pretty bad when:
1) The guy you sign to a 10-day contract becomes a starter.
2) You then release him a couple days later (so why was he starting in the first place?)
A few weeks ago, Cleveland was #6 in the playoff race. Then they lost a couple games, and I think they adopted the attitude of "Well, we've had a pretty good year. Who cares, we weren't supposed to make the playoffs anyway." Consider this quote from Paul Silas:
``If we had our full team and we were reaching this point, I'd be sorely disappointed,'' Cleveland coach Paul Silas said. ``But being short-handed, it was kind of inevitable.''
Are you kidding me? How many coaches are gonna say it was "inevitable" that they'd miss the playoffs?
Overall, the Cavs didn't have that many injuries. Their three best players (LeBron, Boozer, Z) were relatively injury-free. There are lots of playoff teams in the Eastern Conference who have had to deal with injuries, so I don't know why Silas thinks it was "inevitable" the Cavs would collapse down the stretch.
Anyway, with regards to the Heat @ Cavs game, I don't know how a team with 8 straight losses (and was just eliminated from the playoffs) can have any "value", especially if McInnis doesn't play.
I'll take the Heat. Unlike the Cavs, they've played good ball the last 3-4 weeks. Also, the Heat are still playing for the #4 spot in the East.