DEFENSE RANK:
1. PIT 36 = 3.6/GM
31. CIN 11 = 1.1/GM
OFFENSIVE RANK (sacks given up):
32. CIN 38 = 3.8/gm
29. PIT 35 = 3.5/gm
i looked at this to see how the divisonal games fared, due to the fact that there is usually a rivalry and it is thought players step it up a little.
divisional game sacks on the year:
9.14 - PIT/CLE-5
9.21 - CLE/BAL-5
9.28 - CLE/CIN-4
11.2 - BAL/CLE-3
9.29 - BAL/PIT-8
10.19 - PIT/CIN-7
9.07 - CIN/BAL-2
AVG. = 4.85/GM
at first glance i thought o5.5 would be easy money. but cincy's lack of qb pressure has me thinking otherwise. that being said i think PIT can cover this themselves, especially with the injuries on the CIN line. last week PHI got to the qb 8 times and got 2 theirselves. Last week the steelers gave up 4 while getting 2 themselves, and it was cold, just like tonight.
anybody else see some value here?
1. PIT 36 = 3.6/GM
31. CIN 11 = 1.1/GM
OFFENSIVE RANK (sacks given up):
32. CIN 38 = 3.8/gm
29. PIT 35 = 3.5/gm
i looked at this to see how the divisonal games fared, due to the fact that there is usually a rivalry and it is thought players step it up a little.
divisional game sacks on the year:
9.14 - PIT/CLE-5
9.21 - CLE/BAL-5
9.28 - CLE/CIN-4
11.2 - BAL/CLE-3
9.29 - BAL/PIT-8
10.19 - PIT/CIN-7
9.07 - CIN/BAL-2
AVG. = 4.85/GM
at first glance i thought o5.5 would be easy money. but cincy's lack of qb pressure has me thinking otherwise. that being said i think PIT can cover this themselves, especially with the injuries on the CIN line. last week PHI got to the qb 8 times and got 2 theirselves. Last week the steelers gave up 4 while getting 2 themselves, and it was cold, just like tonight.
anybody else see some value here?