CIA refuses to meet with Congress about "International election tampering"

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
The Intelligence Community (IC) is refusing to provide the House Intelligence Committee with a requested Thursday briefing on Russian interference with the U.S. election, citing an ongoing review of the matter requested by President Obama.

According to a statement, the IC will not be offering comment to Congress until it completes that review, which will cover foreign interference in the electoral process since 2008.

"Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress — and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods," the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said in a statement.

The Obama review is scheduled to be completed by the time Donald Trump takes office on Jan. 20.

Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) had asked the FBI, NSA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and CIA to meet with committee members on Thursday, and called their refusal "unacceptable."The briefing was not requested to be at the director level, meaning that National Intelligence Director James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan and their counterparts were not expected to attend.

“It is unacceptable that the Intelligence Community directors would not fulfill the House Intelligence Committee’s request to be briefed tomorrow on the cyber-attacks that occurred during the presidential campaign,” Nunes said in a statement Wednesday.

“The Committee is deeply concerned that intransigence in sharing intelligence with Congress can enable the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes. The Committee will continue its efforts and will insist that we receive all the necessary cooperation from the relevant leaders of the Intelligence Community.”

The ask came following a Monday letter from Nunes to Clapper demanding he resolve reported discrepancies between the FBI's and CIA's assessments of the Russian hacking.

A Friday story in The Washington Post reported that the CIA believes hacks into the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations were an explicit attempt by the Russian government to help Donald Trump attain the White House — an assessment the FBI reportedly did not believe was supported by the evidence.

The report sparked calls for congressional investigations from both sides of the aisle.

“The Committee is vigorously looking into reports of cyber-attacks during the election campaign, and in particular we want to clarify press reports that the CIA has a new assessment that it has not shared with us,” Nunes said in his statement.

“The legislative branch is constitutionally vested with oversight responsibility of executive branch agencies, which are obligated to comply with our requests.”

Lawmakers are still wrangling over what form that probe should take and who should conduct it, although Republican leadership has sought to contain the investigations to the Intelligence Committee.
Nunes said Monday that any additional probes into the hacking would be duplicative of current committee efforts.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
What can we learn from this? I'm going to suggest the Washington Post's report referencing an unanimous source is going to be proven "mostly false". That the source is spreading mostly "fake news", that the source is providing his own opinion, possibly politically motivated.

Intelligence agencies have not completed their investigation.

There is disagreement among intelligence agencies.

They almost certainly can't speak to motive, which is the first thing on the Post's agenda. They're speculating and fueling hyperbole (by design)

Conflicting reports are surfacing

At the end of the day, I expect the Post's story to be debunked. But just like a Harry Reid, they'll laugh and move on to their next politically motivated lie




PS: I'm speaking in nuances by saying "mostly" because the biggest lies are sprinkled with an element of truth.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Last month Clapper said he lacked 'good insight' about the connection between Russian hacking of Democratic emails and their release by WikiLeaks.

3B54CD7E00000578-4027950-image-a-10_1481620466998.jpg

  • SHARE PICTURE


+6



Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (pictured, centre) takes his seat as he arrives at the November 17 hearing before the House Intelligence Committee




[h=1]Why has the CIA changed its tune?[/h]

Witness how Liberal's run things; political FBI, political IRS, political courts, political media, and political CIA.

 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Who had an incentive to prevent HRC from becoming POTUS.

Who's agents had their real identities and locations exposed. By the reckless manner of HRC.

Who had access to all of this material, without having to steal any codes.

Answer US Intelligence agents who did not want HRC to be POTUS and in charge of Federal Government and exposing more agents and resources and undercover assets in the Middle East.


Shush()*
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
What can we learn from this? I'm going to suggest the Washington Post's report referencing an unanimous source is going to be proven "mostly false". That the source is spreading mostly "fake news", that the source is providing his own opinion, possibly politically motivated.

The didn't show up because this is completely over-blown and borders on fabrication.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
Bombshell evidence in this case!!!

CzfI2u9UsAA-Ux7.jpg


haha

that looks like the same note with the same handwriting used to impugn Trump's campaign manager

"Dear Mr Manofort, here's your 10 million dollars"

For being such sophisticated hackers, they sure do communicate in primitive fashions
 

New member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
3,556
Tokens
Well, it would be embarrassing to show up and not have any proof. What are there, 16 or 17 branches in the intelligence community? I've leaned to the idea that these leaks are nothing more than in-fighting among the factions. From the looks of it the DNC and CIA are heavy invested together, Trump has surrounded himself with brass and has fired warning shots toward the CIA. I think that's probably too data points that put you on the right path about the real truth. I'm not sure movies could do justice to the kinds of drama that must be taking place behind closed doors.

I personally think the CIA needs to go. They've played drug cartel/nation builder/black project manager for far too long. Game of Thrones ain't got shit on the House of US.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Who had an incentive to prevent HRC from becoming POTUS.

Who's agents had their real identities and locations exposed. By the reckless manner of HRC.

Who had access to all of this material, without having to steal any codes.

Answer US Intelligence agents who did not want HRC to be POTUS and in charge of Federal Government and exposing more agents and resources and undercover assets in the Middle East.


Shush()*
That one is easy. The citizens of the United States of America, that's who.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,417
Tokens
These anti-Trump headlines write themselves.

How the hell does a Muslim like John Brennan get to be the head of the CIA anyway?

6a00d83451af9f69e2017d410089f3970c-pi


#draintheswamp
 

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,585
Tokens
The whole thing doesn't make any sense

The implied purpose of Russia influencing an election would be to weaken the USA and strengthen Russia and it's place in the world

The US has weakened and Russia empowered dramatically during Obama's reign. Why wouldn't they want more of the same with Hillary?
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
Bombshell evidence in this case!!!

CzfI2u9UsAA-Ux7.jpg


Oh Dang.

GawDang.

Russians are usually much better than this, do not leave tracks.

GoshDarn. Hard to argue with this.


In all sincerity, directly after the very Evidence provided VIA the hacks of Absolute and Across the Board Corruption within our government and Collusion within Mainstream Media to influence via Deception the American People

directly after this for this Russian Hacker deception (such an obvious lie, yet another and so much Identical thier "M.O.", the same lying they've been doing, and that was shown via the evidence) for this to be getting the traction that it is, is very very Disturbing.

If they succeed in steering our country in to The Hell they desire via a detour from our Democratic System based upon this Russian Hacker lie

directly after Americans got shown that they are Liars....

this would be mind-boggling. People keep telling me not to worry but I can't stop.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
DisInfo

is whats written in big letters on the side of that Dick they're trying to Fuck Us with.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
The whole thing doesn't make any sense

The implied purpose of Russia influencing an election would be to weaken the USA and strengthen Russia and it's place in the world

The US has weakened and Russia empowered dramatically during Obama's reign. Why wouldn't they want more of the same with Hillary?

Yes, "No Sense" and its never GOING to make sense bcuz the Russians did not do this.

Its common knowledge "Who" did, amongst some within the Hacking Comunity, at least "who" gained access to The Poedesta eMails, dumb ass merely used a Russian Proxy, NO Malicious Intent on their part in choosing that IP/Proxy path....no way to forsee the shitstorm that a simple choice to use an avenue that included Russian Proxy would lead to.

Our 17 "intelligence" agencies fully know that Russia does not leave glaringly obvious ID Fingerprints such as this and they fully know that Russia did not do this.

Those who did? Find Out what USGov did to LulzSec (and other groups) for disruption infinitely LESS than this Operation has caused and you'll understand why they don't want "Credit". :):)

Again: The Poedesta Hack was accomplished via a simple eMail like we all have gotten saying "Reset Your Password".

CNN and other MSM along with The Liberal Left just continue to try and Fuck Us. They will not stop.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
Game of Thrones ain't got shit on the House of US.

Boy, I'm telling you. Thats Gospel Truth. ^^^^^

And I thot GoT was Insane.....this here what we've got is absolutely nuts.

God I'd LOVE for The Focus to be just upon Repairing This Nation.

We are "so close".....to maybe an avenue to there....

"House of Cards" also......a well-written and intriguing show but pales by comparison to the reality of our completely messed up Political circumstance, at present.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
The whole thing doesn't make any sense

The implied purpose of Russia influencing an election would be to weaken the USA and strengthen Russia and it's place in the world

The US has weakened and Russia empowered dramatically during Obama's reign. Why wouldn't they want more of the same with Hillary?

Right.

Under Hillary/Obama, Russia annexed Crimea, blew a passenger airline out of the sky, and sided with Iran and the Syrian government to commit genocide.

Putin doesn't want Hillary to win!!!

:):):):):):):):)
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
The whole thing doesn't make any sense

The implied purpose of Russia influencing an election would be to weaken the USA and strengthen Russia and it's place in the world

The US has weakened and Russia empowered dramatically during Obama's reign. Why wouldn't they want more of the same with Hillary?
All I can tell you is common sense escapes some people.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,923
Messages
13,575,275
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com