I just finished reading the article by Nover on the best and worst posters. While I agree with some of the opinions such as Irish and Judge being great posters, I thought it was very cheap to say that Peep's a bad poster. It's quite obvious had this article come out 6 months ago when Peep was part of the RX that he would have been one of the best posters. Now that he's left the RX and has a competing website he' one of the worst. It's also funny to see that all of the RX employees and board members are great posters. Talk about a homer article.
raiders while I agree 100% with you that peep should not be on there for worst poster....you are wrong about the second part where you say all the RX employees and AB members are on there....
in fact in this list below from steve only 5 out of 16 of the posters below are from the board room
Krackman, TTinco, Halifax, Neilm, Nero, Walk of Life, Winky Duck, Patrick McIrish, Uncle Butternutts, The General, Joey C, Philosopher, Reno, Lander, Wild Bill and Judge Wapner
in fact in this list below from steve only 5 out of 16 of the posters below are from the board room
Krackman, TTinco, Halifax, Neilm, Nero, Walk of Life, Winky Duck, Patrick McIrish, Uncle Butternutts, The General, Joey C, Philosopher, Reno, Lander, Wild Bill and Judge Wapner
Sorry folks
Complete bullshit IMO. Peep is not only a good poster, but a very valuable one at that. He brings a technical aspect (db) to a forum which is usually a department in which many general boards are lacking (not talking about SSB, and the like). He exposes the novice gambler to a something very numbers oriented. That is the basis to much of my gambling, so I can certainly relate. I havent even touched upon his opinions on certain books (althought obstinate at times) which are indesensible. Peep was a GREAT mod and is an asset to any forum, not a detriment.
Complete bullshit IMO. Peep is not only a good poster, but a very valuable one at that. He brings a technical aspect (db) to a forum which is usually a department in which many general boards are lacking (not talking about SSB, and the like). He exposes the novice gambler to a something very numbers oriented. That is the basis to much of my gambling, so I can certainly relate. I havent even touched upon his opinions on certain books (althought obstinate at times) which are indesensible. Peep was a GREAT mod and is an asset to any forum, not a detriment.
Dante- Over 31% from your list are BR members. Other BR members are mentioned throughout the article. While I do like all the mods here and enjoy there posts by listing such a high percentage of BR members as good posters and taking a shot at Peep this article is nothing more than the RX patting itself on the back.
raiders..you have no argument from me..I was just commenting on your wording of "ALL" <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>It's also funny to see that all of the RX employees and board members are great posters <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> im just saying that 31% is not all and not even the majority in the list above
