CFL - Betting Systems - Week 4

[GreenValley]

Only three systems come into play this week:<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
<o></o>
System 6……26-6 SU……1-1TY<o></o>
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice:smarttags" /><st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Calgary</st1lace></st1:City><o></o>
<o></o>
System 7……28-6 SU……0-1 TY<o></o>
<st1:State w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Saskatchewan</st1lace></st1:State><o></o>
<o></o>
System 13……19-5 SU……1-1 TY<o></o>
<st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Toronto</st1lace></st1:City><o></o>
<o></o>
Of Interest:<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">British Columbia</st1:State></st1lace> 2-14 Under as favorite<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">British Columbia</st1:State></st1lace> 7-22 Under at home<o></o>
<st1:State w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">British Columbia</st1lace></st1:State> 3-14 Under vs. Non Conf<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Hamilton</st1:City></st1lace> 8-22 Under on road<o></o>
<st1:State w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Saskatchewan</st1lace></st1:State> 22-9 Over on Sat:<o></o>
<o></o>
<o></o>
BOL,<o></o>
Green Valley<o></o>

 

[GreenValley]

CFL - 2H Totals

For those of you who like to get involved with 2H totals in the CFL, I’ve got a little something here that may be of value to you.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
<o></o>
If you who have seen my second half totals for the WNBA you know they are doing OK with this years results at 7-1 ATS and the previous 2 years were 43-5 ATS<o></o>
<o></o>
The reason I mention this is because I wanted to try something similar, using almost the same formula, in the CFL. As a test I went back over last years 2H totals and was shocked at the results. I don’t know if last year was just an anomaly, or is a rule of thumb. In either case I am going to monitor it this year. <o></o>
<o></o>
The System is:<o></o>
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice:smarttags" /><st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Bet</st1:City> <st1:State w:st="on">ON</st1:State></st1lace> any teams TOTAL after 3 straight overs or unders in the opposite direction for the 2H.
<o></o>
Example:<o></o>
If a team goes over in the second half 3 straight times then start to bet them under……If a team goes under 3 straight times start to bet them over. This is designed as a 2 deep chase system so you only have two shots at winning.<o></o>
<o></o>
The crazy part:<o></o>
Last year there was 17 times in which the situation occurred. You were 14-3 in game #1 and 3-0 if you had to play game #2. That’s a perfect 17-0. I told you….crazy.<o></o>
<o></o>
I bring this up now because their would be 4 qualifiers for Week 4.<o></o>
Hamilton……2H Under<o></o>
<st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Winnipeg</st1lace></st1:City>……2H Under<o></o>
<st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Edmonton</st1lace></st1:City>……2H Under<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Toronto</st1:City></st1lace>……2H Under<o></o>
<o></o>
Note: <st1:City w:st="on">Edmonton</st1:City> and <st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Toronto</st1:City></st1lace> are the same game.<o></o>
<o></o>
I can’t say I will just make these plays blindly, but I’ll keep you posted for the next few weeks. I curious to find out if I have stumbled onto something, or if it’s just a waste of time. In either case……<o></o>
<o></o>
<o></o>
BOL,<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1laceName w:st="on">Green</st1laceName> <st1laceType w:st="on">Valley</st1laceType></st1lace><o></o>

 

[Leafsfan34]

Thanks for the info and GL this week

 

[ivan722]

Great insight and information as usual Green Valley.

 

[GreenValley]

Leafsfan & Ivan

Here's another tidbit that just came my way a few minutes ago from a guy up in Canada that has been betting CFL for many years.

FWIW Department:
In the last 3 years Toronto has had to play the same team back to back 9 times. In those 9 times they have covered at least 1 of those two contests making them 9-0 ATS at least once in B2B's.
Last week they lost to Edmonton, this weeks opponent again, SU and ATS. This week they would be going for 10-0 ATS.


BOL,
Green Valley

 

[ivan722]

GV, so regarding the Argo B-B games, the trend refers to them covering and winning one of the two contests, either the first or the second game? For this two game set against Edmonton, since they lost and didn't cover the first game on the road, the trend dictates them covering and winning the upcoming rematch at home. Is this correct Green Valley?
(Thanks again for your key input.)
:toast:

 

[GreenValley]

ivan722

Tied up this morning and just got in.

Yes, that is correct.

If a person is so inclined, Totonto is supposed to cover this week.


BOL,
GV

 

[gskiman]

Anyone been playing these 2H Unders?
2-0 this week.
2H 26.5 ED/Tor
Any Opinions?

For those of you who like to get involved with 2H totals in the CFL, I’ve got a little something here that may be of value to you.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
<o></o>
If you who have seen my second half totals for the WNBA you know they are doing OK with this years results at 7-1 ATS and the previous 2 years were 43-5 ATS<o></o>
<o></o>
The reason I mention this is because I wanted to try something similar, using almost the same formula, in the CFL. As a test I went back over last years 2H totals and was shocked at the results. I don’t know if last year was just an anomaly, or is a rule of thumb. In either case I am going to monitor it this year. <o></o>
<o></o>
The System is:<o></o>
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice:smarttags" /><st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Bet</st1:City> <st1:State w:st="on">ON</st1:State></st1lace> any teams TOTAL after 3 straight overs or unders in the opposite direction for the 2H.
<o></o>
Example:<o></o>
If a team goes over in the second half 3 straight times then start to bet them under……If a team goes under 3 straight times start to bet them over. This is designed as a 2 deep chase system so you only have two shots at winning.<o></o>
<o></o>
The crazy part:<o></o>
Last year there was 17 times in which the situation occurred. You were 14-3 in game #1 and 3-0 if you had to play game #2. That’s a perfect 17-0. I told you….crazy.<o></o>
<o></o>
I bring this up now because their would be 4 qualifiers for Week 4.<o></o>
Hamilton……2H Under<o></o>
<st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Winnipeg</st1lace></st1:City>……2H Under<o></o>
<st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Edmonton</st1lace></st1:City>……2H Under<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Toronto</st1:City></st1lace>……2H Under<o></o>
<o></o>
Note: <st1:City w:st="on">Edmonton</st1:City> and <st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Toronto</st1:City></st1lace> are the same game.<o></o>
<o></o>
I can’t say I will just make these plays blindly, but I’ll keep you posted for the next few weeks. I curious to find out if I have stumbled onto something, or if it’s just a waste of time. In either case……<o></o>
<o></o>
<o></o>
BOL,<o></o>
<st1lace w:st="on"><st1laceName w:st="on">Green</st1laceName> <st1laceType w:st="on">Valley</st1laceType></st1lace><o></o>