I hate giving points in basketball especially more than 3 possessions=7pts..
You can parlay Celtics ML to other things you like in other sports or parlay it to Cavs ML or just put something on it at -375 or so which will likely be available tomorrow at Matchbook.
I would be completely floored if the Celtics got beat tomorrow.. FLOORED.
You can parlay Celtics ML to other things you like in other sports or parlay it to Cavs ML or just put something on it at -375 or so which will likely be available tomorrow at Matchbook.
I would be completely floored if the Celtics got beat tomorrow.. FLOORED.
ML is -395 at numerous places.. I'm expecting the line to be somewhere between -370 and -380 at Matchbook tomorrow, I will definitely be putting something on that..
At -380 you need to win over 79% to make profit, but I feel that the Celtics would win this game 93-94 times out of 100...
Doc Rivers coached the Celtics to a 19-7 (73%)record without Garnett
I hate to say it, but its VERY HARD to win two road games in a row, everything is pointing to a Celtics win..
I see lots of value with this ML line
At -380 you need to win over 79% to make profit, but I feel that the Celtics would win this game 93-94 times out of 100...
Doc Rivers coached the Celtics to a 19-7 (73%)record without Garnett
I hate to say it, but its VERY HARD to win two road games in a row, everything is pointing to a Celtics win..
I see lots of value with this ML line
imo this is a poor play but more importantly I don't see any solid reasoning behind the play.
I don't know why the Celtics are more then 5 point favs here. Chicago is very dangerous and just proved in game one their inexperience might not be a huge factor. Player for player talent wise there isn't a big gap. If the youth factor doesn't come into play and Chicago maintains their composure Boston is in trouble.
Down the stretch of the regular season Boston was laboring for every win they got, nothing came easy.
I don't know why the Celtics are more then 5 point favs here. Chicago is very dangerous and just proved in game one their inexperience might not be a huge factor. Player for player talent wise there isn't a big gap. If the youth factor doesn't come into play and Chicago maintains their composure Boston is in trouble.
Down the stretch of the regular season Boston was laboring for every win they got, nothing came easy.
agree 100% with you .... the bulls played out of thier minds in game 1 while allen was ice cold and pierce started off really slow. Rose is a solid player, but he was on fire the other day, Ty Thomas was sticking 18 foot shots like it was no big deal and Noah had 17 freakin boards ...... Celts defense will play with passion tonight and get an easy victory
I may look to parlay their ML with another ML out there tonight .... just to bring the juice down
I may look to parlay their ML with another ML out there tonight .... just to bring the juice down
It's up over -400 now alot of places, even up to -500
I'd recommend just taking Celts new series price of -200. If they win tonight, which you'd obviously be counting onfor your ML-400 tonight, you would then have the Celts at -200 when two games ago it wouldve cost you 2.5 times as much juice...and it would just be like starting a 5-game series (even though Bulls technically have homecourt advantage now, still worth the better odds IMO).
I'd recommend just taking Celts new series price of -200. If they win tonight, which you'd obviously be counting onfor your ML-400 tonight, you would then have the Celts at -200 when two games ago it wouldve cost you 2.5 times as much juice...and it would just be like starting a 5-game series (even though Bulls technically have homecourt advantage now, still worth the better odds IMO).
Not relevant because Powe, Big Baby, and Rondo missed multiple games in that stretch. I'd focus more on the last 2-3 weeks where they played 12-2 ball down the stretch.
Besides, the games KG came back for randomly I guess arent counted as "without KG" but he didnt add much to the effort at 15 mins per gam, so thats taking away from the guys who deserve credit for those wins.
Besides, the games KG came back for randomly I guess arent counted as "without KG" but he didnt add much to the effort at 15 mins per gam, so thats taking away from the guys who deserve credit for those wins.
Obviously a lot of people are against me on this which I'm pretty shocked about honestly...so I'm just gonna say right now I'm putting a decent-sized bet on Celts -200 for series and gonna just enjoy the series (hopefully). Expecting DD win tonight personally but you never know...
GL to everyone, whatever you decide
GL to everyone, whatever you decide
