Can't believe how dumb the people of EWINNER are.

[FatTony]

Corby

Explain to the rest of the forum what you explained to me in our emails on why you can't bet a later game first in an "if" bet.

I can't believe bookmaking is what you do for a living.

 

[StoneCold+]

This should be good.........

 

[blueedwards]

thought corby was at sirbet. are there two corbys?

 

[FatTony]

Same Guy.

 

[Journeyman]

Not many Corbey`s I wouldn`t think.. what difference does it make IF is IF?

 

[FatTony]

Exactly Journeyman. But you have to hear it from them why they won't allow it.

Worse conspiracy theory then JFK's magic bullet.

 

[Woody0]

So when you have 2 MLB games differing by 5 minutes and the early one starts late is the bet void?

 

[StoneCold+]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by unabomber:
I can't believe bookmaking is what you do for a living.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

ARE WE SURE ABOUT THIS?

 

[TTinCO]

They "are" Sirbet, and that also may explain the confusion regarding the rules (different for each book?).

I don't know the reasoning behind it....maybe a different approach to different market segments?

 

[FatTony]

I'll just quote the email with their reasoning.

...."If you play a if wager with the parent wager being later than the daughter wager, then
you know going into the later wager weather you won your if wager. Meaning its easier
to buy a point or two and attempt a middle when all it would cost you is one wager to win
the possiblility to win three wagers.

I hope this confusing explaination helps you."

 

[eh]

It is sad that this is not a joke. That is one of the saddest and funniest things I have heard.

 

[GringoinCR]

What a joke. Are they bookmakers or what? Hopefully they will come in here and clear this up. As it stands they look green.

 

[FatTony]

If they were to respond to this thread, It would be hysterical. There's no way they're doing it. I DARE THEM!