Bush is a lock over Kerry here's why...

[GAMEFACE]

As you know the liberal media has been beating up on Bush and America hard for the last 3+ years and it has not done much for Kerry in the polls.

Americans have not even had the chance to look closely at Kerrys record as the media does not want to touch his poor voting record over the last 16 years in the senate. Kerry is ultra liberal and Americans can't stand liberalism. That's why liberal politicians never admit to being liberal.

I see Bush winning over Kerry 53% to 45% and Bush winning in a total landslide in the electorial college, it won't even be close.

The problem the democratic party has is they have had to cater to every wacked out group out there is and the majority of Americans do not agree with such views.

When Michael Moore is more of a hero to a party than their own presidential candidate an objective person has to admit they are in serious trouble.

At the end of the day Kerry is the most liberal senator in the senate and that's not going to fly in America on election day.

Bush in a landslide, book it.

 

[ChuckSims]

Damn have you been brainwashed. Too much FNC or maybe the pill popping pumpkin head gas bag junkie Rush Limbaugh?

 

[volhound]

what are the odds offshore?

I bet my friend $20 and took bush at 3 to 1. I get the odds. I win $60 or he wins $20

vol

 

[GAMEFACE]

Vol,
You're a smart guy. Did you book this after he returned from propaganda 9-11? Hell I should stand out side the theatre and take money from these suckers. I've seen Bush @ -130, so you've done well.

 

[Marco]

I really don't have a preference for either candidate, but I don't really want to see us involved in war for the next four years somewhere on this planet.....which will happen if Fascist Bush Jr gets re-elected....

Ironic how the likes of Gates and Microsoft was attacked and nearly broken up for stepping near monopoly status, while Cheney and Halliburton employing the no-bid contract made millions gouging the American public and fattening thier own pockets....hmmmm....

I guess the only standard to be derived from that equation is that it's legal as long as the right people profit from it.....

 

[Journeyman]

I think Bush gets by kerry ...I am not happy with Bush though...

my odds

Bush -135

 

[lander]

newsflash ...

most people are going to be voting AGAINST Bush, not for Kerry ...

while Kerry is a poor candidate - at least he's NOT Bush.

 

[EverFresh]

Kerry -150 now that F911 is out

 

[GAMEFACE]

I'm not all that happy with Bush either, however, Kerry is so much worse I'll take my chances Bush will actually move to the right. Fighting a PC war has made things much harder than needed. We need another Reagan for this country soon. Kerry loses big.

 

[volhound]

Gameface

I took the bet 2 mo. ago. my friend is a sucker b/c he is a commie

vol

 

[Journeyman]

I can't see kerry winning...he just doesn't have enough...and as bad as Bush is going that really sums up how bad the Democratic rep is...Bush will win...I hate to say it

 

[GAMEFACE]

vol,

after propaganda 9-11 he's probably in commie heaven, like some of our fello posters. are you going to take some more from him?

 

[bunyon]

I'm afraid Bush is going to be re-elected and don't be surprised if Osama is captured between now and Election Day.

 

[SENDITIN]

I'm afraid Bush is going to be re-elected and don't be surprised if Osama is captured between now and Election Day.

What's good for America is bad for you freaking liberals. You guys would actually hate it if we caught Osama...amazing!!

 

[GAMEFACE]

Senditin,

You hit the nail on the head. The democratic parties success relies on the failure of America. What a sad party they've become. They've lost in the arena of ideas. All they have left is race baiting and grandma's not going to get social security and bush is hitler. That's all they have, if they really say what they would do if they took power only about 25% of the people support them.

 

[SENDITIN]

Amen Gameface...the libs have unleashed all they've got on "W" and still the presumed assumptive candidate Lurch can't get any traction. I think the Republicans have been patiently holding their fire and will release a shitstorm on Lurch as the election approaches. Backup the truck on the -127 at Pinnacle before it heads upward.

 

[MeantownScum]

May the Force NOT be with the French-looking candidate...

Jean Francois Karree

 

[PatPatriot]

A few weeks ago the prissy uptown metrosexual was all in a tither when he was at fenway park and found his seat to be wet,someone handed him a paper towel and he asked them to clean it off his seat...what a wicked panzee.

This was in the Boston herald.

 

[bunyon]

What's good for America is bad for you freaking liberals. You guys would actually hate it if we caught Osama...amazing!![/QUOTE]

What would've been good for America would've been to spend our resources on bringing bin Laden to Justice before now. Have we been looking for him? Yes......Have we done everything in our power to catch him? No.

You can't tell me that with the sophistication of our intelligence, that theres a human alive that could ellude us for almost 3 years. Especially the perpetrater of a crime such as 9-11. You guys watch Fox News too much. Also, I have figured something out, if you disagree with certain people on this board and don't proclaim George W Bush the "second coming", you are a "freaking liberal". Keep it up guys, you are making Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson proud.

 

[UncleMoneybags]

bunyon,

You can't get blood from a turnip. Osama has curtailed his use of satellite phones as well as other locational giveaways. Add that to the fact that most Muslims will give food and/or shelter to another Muslim in need and you should be able to see why he can elude the authorities if, in fact, he is out and about or not dead.

Look at Eric Rudolph. The same technology couldn't be used to find him. They had to rely on dumb luck. If he can do it virtually alone for over 3 years then it would be logical to assume that bin Laden could do it as well but that's just me.