BUCS BEATDOWN BUMBLING BEARS

[doctorsuccess]

With the line going from -3 to -2.5, a significant move, I can't resist calling on the Bucs to bulldoze the blundering Bears, 0-11 SU and 2-8-1 ATS in their last twelve games. Let's get those pirate ship cannons blasting. Justin Fields is the new DeShone Kizer.

A far cry from last year's Week One celebration:

 

[TylerG]

Great insight! How do I subscribe to your write-ups?

 

[Serbone]

Actually the Bears held the GB running game down and the stats were equal if you look at first downs, run yards, passing yards, time of possession you could not pick the winner if you just saw that. Two HUGE turnovers changed the game and made it look ugly.

12 new Bear starters had not jelled, this week they should be more effective. Bears will try to run the ball down TBs throats, not so sure they can. Fields needs to throw some mid and deep patterns to loosen things up, he did not vs GB. Maybe he cannot. But he needs to change and drop back and throw on schedule he cannot go back and dance around like he tends to do. Maybe he is a bust as a pocket passer and "thats that".

Not picking the Bears (yet) but it is not all what it apprears. TB beat a soft Minny team that was taken apart last night though Minny back doored in garbage time for a push +6.

 

[Mofome2]

Actually the Bears held the GB running game down and the stats were equal if you look at first downs, run yards, passing yards, time of possession you could not pick the winner if you just saw that. Two HUGE turnovers changed the game and made it look ugly.

12 new Bear starters had not jelled, this week they should be more effective. Bears will try to run the ball down TBs throats, not so sure they can. Fields needs to throw some mid and deep patterns to loosen things up, he did not vs GB. Maybe he cannot. But he needs to change and drop back and throw on schedule he cannot go back and dance around like he tends to do. Maybe he is a bust as a pocket passer and "thats that".

Not picking the Bears (yet) but it is not all what it apprears. TB beat a soft Minny team that was taken apart last night though Minny back doored in garbage time for a push +6.

Minny could have won that game if bot for the turnovers. Eagles are not the same team as last year. Even though they a few starters out on D I believe they will have to put up the fair of points in order to win games.

 

[exploited17]

Eagles pass defense and Hurts not looking the same but the rushing game is still something to deal with.

 

[doctorsuccess]

Great insight! How do I subscribe to your write-ups?

Thanks, but I've made so much money in the NFL the last three years, I've put the sports analysis on hold.

 

[TylerG]

I have sent you an email

 

[doctorsuccess]

I have sent you an email

Thanks, I'll check my emails.

 

[doctorsuccess]

Green Bay now +3 has turned into another value play. A super one!

 

[doctorsuccess]

Bucs!

 

[doctorsuccess]

Packers!

I wish every week was this easy.

 

[doctorsuccess]

I have sent you an email

I emailed you a response early this morning. Picks are 4-1 today with Monday Night pending.

 

[TylerG]

Nice picks !!

 

[doctorsuccess]

Thank you.

Root for New England to win tonight so Miami isn't so heavily favored next week.

 

[TylerG]

Thanks, but I've made so much money in the NFL the last three years, I've put the sports analysis on hold.

instead of analysis for every game, could you do a write up on a couple picks each week that you have insight on similar to the Bears game?

 

[doctorsuccess]

instead of analysis for every game, could you do a write up on a couple picks each week that you have insight on similar to the Bears game?

I'd love to, but I just don't have the time. It takes forty to fifty hours a week to correctly analyze sixteen games. It pays off handsomely, but I've reached the point where I no longer want or need the money. There are other things in life I'm much more interested in pursuing.

 

[TylerG]

I'd love to, but I just don't have the time. It takes forty to fifty hours a week to correctly analyze sixteen games. It pays off handsomely, but I've reached the point where I no longer want or need the money. There are other things in life I'm much more interested in pursuing.

not 16, how about 2 ?

 

[Serbone]

Maybe he is a bust as a pocket passer and "thats that".

Fields is a bust. Bad field vision, bad decision making all the time.

He cannot see the defensive alignment and then get the ball ON SCHEDULE (2.7 seconds according to Tom Brady), he dances in and out of the pocket and gets sacked or hurried or deflected way too often. His OSU offense was not a pocket passing offense, they bullied teams with a great OL and used the run to control the game then Fields could throw to wide open elite speedy future NFL wide receivers that were going against single coverage.

Sure the Bears can win a few if they tell him to run first but he will get dinged and injured, it is inevitable.

Owners are foolishly going for the new "athletic" QBs and that is a very bad strategy.

They should draft QBs who were on NFL style pocket passing offenses and started there at least two years. There is a long list of busts for so called athletic scramble and run too often QBs and Field and Lance are being added to that list, so will Richardson, eventually. I do not put Young in this category, by the way.