Bruce Feldman's Most Improved Teams

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
I like Bruce Feldman because he has his nose in college football year round. So, his opinion on teams carries a little extra weight with me . . .



Teams most likely to be most improved teams of 2009

Tuesday, May 26, 2009 | Feedback | Print Entry

Since optimism is brewing around Seattle and the Washington Huskies are coming off an 0-12 season, Bob Condotta looks at some of the biggest one-season improvements in college football and detects one key similarity in most of these upstarts:

A soft schedule is one of the biggest common threads among teams that made huge leaps in recent years. Minnesota was the most improved team last season, going from 1-11 to 7-6. But four of those wins came against Northern Illinois, Bowling Green, Montana State and Florida Atlantic. Illinois was the most improved team of 2007, going from 2-10 to 9-4, and was helped by facing Western Illinois, Ball State and a horrible Syracuse team.

Obviously, another similarity is that all these teams had to pretty much stink the year before. Many teams probably made significant improvements in going from, say, 8-4 to 10-2, but it doesn't show up as much. This week's top 10 subject is the teams with the best shot to make the biggest jump in wins:

1. Notre Dame (7-6): How far out on a limb is this? The Irish have tons of three-year starters returning, some very good skill players and one of the softest schedules in the country. They'll face a handful of teams that have suffered some incredibly bad news this offseason. Charlie Weis' team should be favored in every game except for when USC comes to South Bend, and the Irish could go 11-1 without beating a single ranked opponent. If they can become even just a decent running team, they'll be in a BCS bowl game. They could get throttled in it by, say, Texas or Oklahoma, but they'll at least be in it.

2. Michigan (3-9): The jump in Rich Rodriguez's teams from Season 1 to Season 2 has been well documented, and let's be honest: After going 3-9, the team has lots of room to grow. It also will be much, much more seasoned on the offensive line and will finally have a quarterback with the wheels to add spice to the offense, even if that new quarterback is inexperienced. The Wolverines will open the 2009 season with four straight home games. The nonconference schedule will be very manageable with all four games at home, and the fourth will be against FCS team Delaware State.

3. Ohio (4-8): No less an expert than Phil Steele picks the Bobcats to win the MAC East title, and there are plenty of reasons to board the bandwagon. Start with Ohio's defense and special teams, which should be the best or close to it in the MAC. The Bobcats also will return almost all their top skills guys from last season. And they won't have to face Central or Western Michigan, the two favorites of the MAC West.

4. Baylor (4-8): Art Briles' team will have 16 starters back, including QB Robert Griffin, a dynamic talent who has made this program relevant again. Briles has surrounded Griffin with some speedy playmakers, and 350-pound Penn State transfer Phil Taylor will anchor the defense. To say Briles has big expectations for Taylor would be an understatement. When I spoke to the coach a few months ago, he said he'll be disappointed if Taylor doesn't make the All-Big 12 first team this season. My hunch is Baylor will match last season's win total by mid-October.

5. UCLA (4-8): Bruins coach Rick Neuheisel took over a very inexperienced, undermanned team last year. The Bruins' O-line was a disaster, and it got even worse after being hit hard by injuries. Some transfers and some quality big recruits will make a huge difference up front, and UCLA infused some necessary speed on both sides of the ball. I expect them to come on very strong late in the season.

6. Washington (0-12): New coach Steve Sarkisian apparently has made a big difference in QB Jake Locker already. The Huskies will have 18 starters back, including one of the West's top defensive linemen in Daniel Te'o-Nesheim. Their linebackers also should be solid. They're probably staring at a 1-4 start anyway, but look for them to knock off at least one of the Arizona schools and be competitive in almost all their Pac-10 games.

7. Southern Miss (7-6): The Golden Eagles are, along with Houston, my dark-horse contenders for that BCS-buster role. USM finished last season strong and will have 19 starters back. Plus, the team added some playmaking potential, as defensive linemen Willie Packer and Joel Ross and OLB-DE Scottie Williams all will be eligible to play this season. USM will travel to Kansas, Houston and ECU, but I still expect it to be a force in C-USA this season and crack the Top 25.

8. Colorado (5-7): I'm not ready to go as far as coach Dan Hawkins did in December when he predicted 10 wins this season, but CU has a lot of impressive athletes on both sides of the ball. You would think the Buffs, who were 100th in the country in scoring last season, would be due for a major leap in production. (Wait, a Big 12 team was that far down in the country in scoring last season?!?) Special teams also need to make big improvements. The best news on the schedule front is they won't have to face Oklahoma, but they will have to go to Texas and Oklahoma State. They have a good chance to be favored in all six of their home games, although the season finale against Nebraska is very iffy. It should be noted that the home team has won the previous three meetings between the schools.

9. Stanford (5-7): Jim Harbaugh has shown that he can not only motivate but also recruit. And even so, he'll have 17 starters back, not including hot-shot QB Andrew Luck, who beat out incumbent Tavita Pritchard. The Cardinal open with consecutive road games, but don't be surprised if they win both at Washington State and at Wake Forest and open 4-0. I expect they could go 3-1 in their first four games at worst.

10. UTEP (5-7): Mike Price again has a potent passing game ready to give opponents fits. He also has an experienced O-line. The Miners also won't have to face Southern Miss or East Carolina.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
BS...I'm a big Bruce Feldman fan myself. And I think he's dead on with every one of these teams. As for Baylor, they may not make a big jump. But I do expect them to go from 4-8 to a 6-6 maybe 7-5 season if everything falls right for them. Glad to see he is on Colorado too. Judging by Hawkins recruiting the last couple years, this team may very well have the best personnel in the Big 12 North Division. It's just a matter of if he can put everything together. What I don't understand is why Steele can pick Nebraska over Colorado when Nebraska lost more starters, and it took a miracle 57 yard FG to beat Colorado at home last year. And now Nebraska is expected to beat Colorado in Boulder with a new QB? And Kansas in Lawrence? I don't see it, although the Huskers could possibly have the best defense in their division. But their offense looks like it will be down a couple notches from last season. Plus a tougher schedule... I'm skeptical.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
BS...I'm a big Bruce Feldman fan myself. And I think he's dead on with every one of these teams. As for Baylor, they may not make a big jump. But I do expect them to go from 4-8 to a 6-6 maybe 7-5 season if everything falls right for them. Glad to see he is on Colorado too. Judging by Hawkins recruiting the last couple years, this team may very well have the best personnel in the Big 12 North Division. It's just a matter of if he can put everything together. What I don't understand is why Steele can pick Nebraska over Colorado when Nebraska lost more starters, and it took a miracle 57 yard FG to beat Colorado at home last year. And now Nebraska is expected to beat Colorado in Boulder with a new QB? And Kansas in Lawrence? I don't see it, although the Huskers could possibly have the best defense in their division. But their offense looks like it will be down a couple notches from last season. Plus a tougher schedule... I'm skeptical.

Not only that, GS, but I have to be proven that Bo Pelini is a good head coach. I think it's safe to say that he is already better than Callahan, but is he good enough to jump the hurdles and win a Big 12 Championship?

I'm going to continue to believe that he is not until he finally does. He is somewhat volatile at times and that doesn't always equate to good decision-making.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
3,985
Tokens
6. Washington (0-12): New coach Steve Sarkisian apparently has made a big difference in QB Jake Locker already. The Huskies will have 18 starters back, including one of the West's top defensive linemen in Daniel Te'o-Nesheim. Their linebackers also should be solid. They're probably staring at a 1-4 start anyway, but look for them to knock off at least one of the Arizona schools and be competitive in almost all their Pac-10 games.

9. Stanford (5-7): Jim Harbaugh has shown that he can not only motivate but also recruit. And even so, he'll have 17 starters back, not including hot-shot QB Andrew Luck, who beat out incumbent Tavita Pritchard. The Cardinal open with consecutive road games, but don't be surprised if they win both at Washington State and at Wake Forest and open 4-0. I expect they could go 3-1 in their first four games at worst.

No Surprises for me on these two. Each has been talked about to death in the P10 thread. Both teams I think will have better years than most anticipate. Form a betting perspective my money will most likely be on UW in most of their early season games.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
I like Bruce Feldman because he has his nose in college football year round. So, his opinion on teams carries a little extra weight with me . . .

5. UCLA (4-8): Bruins coach Rick Neuheisel took over a very inexperienced, undermanned team last year. The Bruins' O-line was a disaster, and it got even worse after being hit hard by injuries. Some transfers and some quality big recruits will make a huge difference up front, and UCLA infused some necessary speed on both sides of the ball. I expect them to come on very strong late in the season.

BS,
I've been reading Feldman for years and IMHO he's one of the best informed writers out there. His opinions are more often than not right on the money. I always allow for some margin of error because there are forces at work that nobody has detected and situations change, sometimes in a heartbeat. Overall, I give most of the ESPN writers a lot of credit for getting it out there and getting it right.

I think with every team on this list, there are plenty of good reasons to expect improvement. But to me, the next and probably the most important question is, will it be enough to matter? Or, how much will it matter?

I am looking for a bolt out of the blue. Something that goes far beyond expectations. Or at least enough to go beyond expectations on their lines. That's a tough question -- especially as something to predict.

UW comes to mind at the top of the list because they were just so terribly bad last year. It was an exceptionally bad year for them. If that perception lingers, UW will be a great play for a while, at least until the lines are adjusted.

Next UCLA. They also had a miserable year because they had bigtime QB problems and major issues with their OL, however their OL began to wake up nearer to the end of the year. It might not have shown up in the box scores because their QB problem never changed. Now they have at least a chance because they have a new QB (keyword NEW) but he appears a lot less error prone than Craft. This is EXTREMELY significant because in 1/2 dozen cases at least, Craft literally threw the game away to his opponents. In a typical game, Craft made a 14 point difference in the final outcome. Prince can't possibly be as bad as Craft was, even as a freshman first year starter. AND... their OL continues to get better with some key additions. At least some of this flys under the radar. Unfortunately UCLA gets the money too often because they have a huge fan base, so take all of this with a grain of salt. (just one grain)

Stanford continues to get better. That is expected but the question here is "HOW MUCH BETTER?" They could be WAY better. But we'll have to see just how good Andrew Luck really is and how well Harbaugh is able to patch up a pretty lousey defensive backfield so teams can't just run down the field on them throwing the ball at will.

In the case of UW, I think they will likely be a stronger play nearer to the start of the season. In the case of Stanford and UCLA grooving new QB's, that improvement is likely to happen over the course of time, but there could be some early plays on both that may hit.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
I will post my Pac 10 preview, but I have no argument with these picks. Uceless and Washington are obvious picks. Stanford is going to have it a bit tougher because they are not going to sneak up on anyone.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Here is his potential BCS Busters:

Top 10 potential BCS busters

Monday, June 1, 2009 | Feedback | Print Entry

It has become more apparent in the past few years that teams from outside the glamour conferences can in fact become gatecrashers to the BCS party and do some damage when they get there. This week's Top 10 -- Best Shots to be a BCS Buster:

1. Boise State: The Broncos have a chance to get the buzz rolling early when they host Oregon. Last season, an incredibly young BSU team went to Autzen Stadium and knocked off the Ducks. Almost the entire Broncos team is back and the returning players all figure to be better, especially sophomore QB Kellen Moore. If BSU gets by Oregon, it's all way downhill from there. They go to Fresno State (BSU has won seven of eight games against the Bulldogs by an average of 24 ppg). The next-toughest hurdles would be at Tulsa and at Louisiana Tech and a home game with Nevada. That schedule is good IF Boise beats Oregon. If not, the Broncos could win the rest, going 11-1, and still not be a top-15 team.

2. BYU: There is a lot to like about this year's Cougars. Start with experienced QB Max Hall, a physical running game led by Harvey Unga, some big-play potential now that speedy WR McKay Jacobsen is back, a salty defense led by DE Jan Jorgensen (the MWC's all-time sacks leader) and their two toughest conference games, against TCU and Utah, are both at home. The bad news: They have to play mighty Oklahoma in their opener in Arlington, Texas. They also have to face FSU. I think the Cougars can beat the Noles, but I don't like their chances against the Sooners. Still, going 11-1 against this schedule, which should include four top-25 opponents, is more than respectable. And, if they upset the Sooners, then run the table while OU goes on to win the Big 12, BYU would have a legit shot at playing for the BCS title. That's a lot of pressure on a suspect O-line, especially since OU might have the country's top D-line.

3. Southern Miss: The Golden Eagles are back and have a bunch of players who would be starting in the SEC. If phenom WR DeAndre Brown is back to 100 percent by midsummer as Larry Fedora expects, USM will have a dynamic offense. Sophomore QB Austin Davis has a bunch of playmakers around him and the O-line is all back. Defensively, Fedora has his entire D-line back and it gets a big infusion of size and athleticism in DLs Willie Packer and Joel Ross and DE/OLB Scottie Williams. The road schedule won't be easy, though, with games at Kansas, Louisville, Houston and ECU. Still, USM might have more talent than any of them. But that's four road games against solid competition. Maybe USM can afford one slip and still get to a BCS game.

4. Houston: Kevin Sumlin is a rising star in the coaching business and his team should be dangerous this season. QB Case Keenum is an underrated gem with wonderful pocket presence and is just one of those undersized, Texas-bred quarterbacks who light up the scoreboard all season. He has a lot of speed around him and UH imported some talented juco O-linemen. The D does have a lot of holes to fill but UH is going to win a lot of shootouts. The game at Oklahoma State could be a 70-55 kind of affair. Then, UH gets a week off before hosting Texas Tech; Mike Leach protégé UH offensive coordinator Dana Holgorsen gets to try to take down his mentor. The Cougs have the talent to keep both games very interesting. Road trips to Tulsa and UTEP also will be worth watching. Ten wins might seem like a lot but I think it's very realistic and would get them into the top 25.

5. TCU: This might be Gary Patterson's fastest team. Once again, TCU should be nasty on defense and junior QB Andy Dalton has some capable weapons to work with. The middle of the D is new, but Patterson says it's going to be more athletic than it was last year. The Horned Frogs have to go to Virginia, Clemson and BYU and get Utah at home. Going 10-2 might not be good enough for a BCS spot, but they might have enough speed to get to 11 wins.

6. ECU: After making a big early-season splash last season the Pirates fizzled. QB Patrick Pinkney is back again and will need to be much more consistent. He does have his entire O-line back and RB Dominique Lindsay is also back after missing 2008 with a knee injury. On D, five of the team's top six tacklers are back. But it's hard to be too optimistic when you see what awaits them in the nonconference schedule: at WVU and at UNC in consecutive weeks and later in the season they host a Virginia Tech team that might be in the top five.

7. Utah: I expect the Utes to take a step back this season. Bruising RB Matt Asiata is back, but not that much of the offense from last season joins him. The D again should be tough. I do wonder how much the Utes will miss star specialist Louie Sakoda, though. They also have three rough road games: at Oregon, at TCU and at BYU. I'd be stunned if they win two of those three.

8. Central Michigan: The Chips have a borderline Heisman hopeful in Dan LeFevour and they have a lot of experience around him. They can also make some noise with road wins at Arizona and Michigan State to open the season. I don't think it's out of the question to expect that, given both of those teams are breaking in new QBs and LeFevour & Co. have a lot of seasoning from playing in some hostile places. Another hurdle will be playing at BC, but the Eagles too have to establish a new QB and they lost a ton of talent on D. Having said all of that it's so hard for any MAC team to crash a BCS bowl. These guys can't afford anything less than an unbeaten season.

9. FAU: The Sun Belt doesn't get much respect, but the league's talent level is improving every year and its schools generally schedule some real heavyweights out of conference. I think Troy has the best chance to win this league, but the Trojans have to go to Florida and that's too steep for them. FAU, which returns a proven winner in QB Rusty Smith and his top seven receivers, is capable of winning the league and putting up a lot of points on anyone on its schedule. The Owls two toughest nonconference games are at Nebraska and at South Carolina. I think they'd be very fortunate to win one of those two especially since the Owls have to replace their top six tackles from 2008. Still, they have a much better shot taking down the Huskers and Cocks than Troy does winning at UF. Troy also has to go play an improving Arkansas team on the road as well.

10. Nevada: The Pack are a long, long shot but they are a fun team to watch. Lanky QB Colin Kaepernick is a little like a cross between Robert Griffin and Terrelle Pryor. He's also got a few quality RBs to balance out the offense some. Their D-line's also pretty good. In terms of the schedule, the Pack would need a lot of help. They open at Notre Dame, which I think is going to be improved. The problem is if Nevada upsets the Irish in the opener. Chances are no one will put any stock in the Irish again the rest of the season and that would devalue the win quite a bit. The Pack host Mizzou, which figures to be down. If they win those games and come into the final game at Boise with both teams somehow unbeaten and pull the upset, that would get Nevada into a BCS bowl, but I think that's highly unlikely. Going 10-2 is still probably on the north side of optimistic.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
Boise State is the obvious pick, and will get a huge leg up if they defeat Oregon at home in game 1.

The problem I have with BYU is their schedule. There is no doubt that if they run the table, they obviously should go to the big game, but in order to do that, they must win games at the Jerry Dome (or whatever they will call it) against Oklahoma, and at home against Florida State, plus games against TCU and Utah. The good news is that they get TCU and Utah at home.

Southern Miss has to get past away games at Kansas and at East Carolina. They also hae a habit of losing games they should not, as proven by three losses in two years as 7 point favorites or more.

Houston goes to Oklahoma State and Tulsa, and gets Texas Tech at home. It's not going to happen.

The rest are long shots, but I like TCU's chances the best, if they can win away games against ACC teams Virginia and Clemson.
 

Triple digit silver kook
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
13,697
Tokens
Irish with a weaker schedule, finally look to be ready to make some noise.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Irish with a weaker schedule, finally look to be ready to make some noise.

I might be wrong, but I think it is more than just a "weaker schedule" with the irish this year. ND has some of the best talent recruited in the nation, but the last few seasons they have been mostly young, inexperienced and incomplete at spots. This is the first season where everything seems to be coming together. I also think that if the Irish don't make it to a BCS game this year, then Weis needs to resign.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
I might be wrong, but I think it is more than just a "weaker schedule" with the irish this year. ND has some of the best talent recruited in the nation, but the last few seasons they have been mostly young, inexperienced and incomplete at spots. This is the first season where everything seems to be coming together. I also think that if the Irish don't make it to a BCS game this year, then Weis needs to resign.

Their season comes down to running the ball, and getting a pass rush. The inability to run cost them several games last year. I am really sick of the excuses in South Bend. They should be undefeated going into the USC game.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
3,985
Tokens
Top 10 potential BCS busters

Monday, June 1, 2009 | Feedback | Print Entry

It has become more apparent in the past few years that teams from outside the glamour conferences can in fact become gatecrashers to the BCS party and do some damage when they get there. This week's Top 10 -- Best Shots to be a BCS Buster:

1. Boise State: The Broncos have a chance to get the buzz rolling early when they host Oregon. Last season, an incredibly young BSU team went to Autzen Stadium and knocked off the Ducks. Almost the entire Broncos team is back and the returning players all figure to be better, especially sophomore QB Kellen Moore. If BSU gets by Oregon, it's all way downhill from there. They go to Fresno State (BSU has won seven of eight games against the Bulldogs by an average of 24 ppg). The next-toughest hurdles would be at Tulsa and at Louisiana Tech and a home game with Nevada. That schedule is good IF Boise beats Oregon. If not, the Broncos could win the rest, going 11-1, and still not be a top-15 team.


Boise is NOT returning "almost their entire team". 6 on offense and 5 on defense.
Lost 3 of the 4 WR's and there are still ? marks on the oline. Defensively the secondary looks solid but the dline has to replace 3 starters.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Boise is NOT returning "almost their entire team". 6 on offense and 5 on defense.
Lost 3 of the 4 WR's and there are still ? marks on the oline. Defensively the secondary looks solid but the dline has to replace 3 starters.


I noticed that, too. Feldman should know better than that . . . . .
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Keep in mind that Boise also lost the same amount of players last year and still went 12-0. And this was with a freshman QB and an OL with a lot of preseason question marks. I just don't see anything that different for Boise this year. The young DL will be their main question with me. With their strong running game, Oregon could be getting them at just the right time.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Gs

Keep in mind that Boise also lost the same amount of players last year and still went 12-0. And this was with a freshman QB and an OL with a lot of preseason question marks. I just don't see anything that different for Boise this year. The young DL will be their main question with me. With their strong running game, Oregon could be getting them at just the right time.


It may not be good time for Oregon either though. Steele has Boise St at #68 and they are at home, and he has Oregon rated #103 (only 17 teams rated worse) on his NCAA experience chart (p311). This game sets the tone for one of these two teams but is maybe the only major obstacle for Boise St going undefeated. Very dangerous situation for Oregon. As you pointed out they seem to have reached the reload plateau and it looks like it is getting more competitive because some players are leaving to go somewhere else to have a chance to play.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Ucla

Here are the Top 10 Offenses this year in Most Improved Points Scored

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=381 align=center><COLGROUP><COL span=5 width=85><TBODY><TR height=17><TD width=32 height=17></TD><TD class=blackboldheading colSpan=4>MIP OFFENSIVE POINTS</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD height=17></TD><TD colSpan=4></TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>1</TD><TD class=blackboldheading width=170>
Michigan​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading width=8></TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right width=33>6</TD><TD class=blackboldheading width=136>
Notre Dame​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>2</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
UCLA​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading></TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>7</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Illinois​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>3</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Washington​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading></TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>8</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Arkansas​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>4</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
SMU​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading></TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>9</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Hawaii​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>5</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Colorado​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading></TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>10</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
San Diego St​
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Here are the Top 10 Defenses this year in Most Improved Points Allowed

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=center><COLGROUP><COL span=5 width=85><TBODY><TR height=17><TD width=35 height=17></TD><TD class=blackboldheading colSpan=4>MIP DEFENSIVE POINTS</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD height=17></TD><TD class=blackboldheading colSpan=4></TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>1</TD><TD class=blackboldheading width=190>
N Texas​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading width=6>
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right width=25>6</TD><TD class=blackboldheading width=128>
Idaho​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>2</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Washington​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>7</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Pittsburgh​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>3</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Kansas St​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>8</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
UCLA​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>4</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
SMU​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>9</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Washington St​
</TD></TR><TR height=17><TD class=blackboldheading align=right height=17>5</TD><TD class=blackboldheading colSpan=2>
San Diego St​
</TD><TD class=blackboldheading align=right>10</TD><TD class=blackboldheading>
Marshall​
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

UCLA seems to be one of those teams that a lot of our Pac 10 posters don't all agree on. Here Steele shows them imroving both in their offensive output and in the amount of points they will allow (both on his Top 10 MIP list). The other teams on this list look kind of obvious but to move up a notch on off and def is a key. Washington is also on both top 10 categories but UCLA is listed at @ #21 on Steele's Power Poll 120 (which I think is too high) whereas Washington while improving is only #75 on that same poll.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
3,985
Tokens
It may not be good time for Oregon either though. Steele has Boise St at #68 and they are at home, and he has Oregon rated #103 (only 17 teams rated worse) on his NCAA experience chart (p311). This game sets the tone for one of these two teams but is maybe the only major obstacle for Boise St going undefeated. Very dangerous situation for Oregon. As you pointed out they seem to have reached the reload plateau and it looks like it is getting more competitive because some players are leaving to go somewhere else to have a chance to play.


FWIW, Boise has just three seniors in the two deeps. Oregon has 11.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Boise State - returning players

FWIW, Boise has just three seniors in the two deeps. Oregon has 11.

Ducks:

I looked it up on rivals.com and based on the roster going into the TCU game I found the following:

Offense - they list a depth chart with 28 players, 4 were Sr. starters and 4 were not. So 20 of their 28 return
Defense - they list a depth chart with 25 players, 5 were Sr. starters and one was not. So they return 19 or of their 25
They return thir PK, KO, P, SNP, KR, and PR on their special teams which Steele has rated #2 in the nation (Oregon #27)

Steele's experience rating has Boise St. at #68 and Oregon at #103.
My own personal base rating has Boise St +21.4 and Oregon + 6.6 (for whatever that is worth)

Basically, seniors or no seniors those returning players were part of a team that 12-1 LY with a win over Oregon at Oregon.

You know Oregon better than me so whatever you say about them works for me. LY Oregon lost only 8 starts to injury (10th lowest in the country).

I just went to the Boise St official site where it lists its 2009 roster. I only found 5 seniors on the entire roster. Apparently they have some talented younger players.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
3,985
Tokens
Ducks:

I looked it up on rivals.com and based on the roster going into the TCU game I found the following:

Offense - they list a depth chart with 28 players, 4 were Sr. starters and 4 were not. So 20 of their 28 return
Defense - they list a depth chart with 25 players, 5 were Sr. starters and one was not. So they return 19 or of their 25
They return thir PK, KO, P, SNP, KR, and PR on their special teams which Steele has rated #2 in the nation (Oregon #27)

Steele's experience rating has Boise St. at #68 and Oregon at #103.
My own personal base rating has Boise St +21.4 and Oregon + 6.6 (for whatever that is worth)

Basically, seniors or no seniors those returning players were part of a team that 12-1 LY with a win over Oregon at Oregon.

You know Oregon better than me so whatever you say about them works for me. LY Oregon lost only 8 starts to injury (10th lowest in the country).

I just went to the Boise St official site where it lists its 2009 roster. I only found 5 seniors on the entire roster. Apparently they have some talented younger players.

I will never discount game experience but there is something to be said here. Particularily as I've examined their Dline which will be manned by sophomores who have almost no game experience. Lagarrette Blount is going to have a field day.

While I give full credit to BSU for winning that game, I will also say that those who are looking at last years contest with an eye toward handicapping this years game will be making some conclusions that may not be fully thought out.
Last year once they "removed" Masoli from the game, Boise had the luxury of stacking the box knowing that Harper could not throw. They will not have the same one dimensional offense this year.

This is from the beginning of the game last year prior to the cheap shot that took Masoli out of the game. Oregon was moving the ball at will and Blount looked like a man among boys.

I don't understand the stat that you listed about Oregon losing only 8 starts to injury. I still haven't picked up the mag, can you go into more detail I am not able to justify that giving Oregon lost at least 12 starts when the starting qb went down in fall camp. Perhaps I am missinterpeting.



<object width="425" height="344">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3aP0SphLZeY&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,533
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com