This clinton piece of trash needs to have his nuts kicked in. I'll be very disappointed in the lack of testosterone the republican senators have if they don't bust him up bad for this. Meanwhile, Berger's close association with clinton and kerry should be investigated to the hilt. We already know the demi's are girliemen, lets hope the republicans don't cave in on this - this is big, very important stuff. The 9/11 commission must hold its report until Berger is looked into completely!
Berger and his lawyer, Lanny Breuer, said the former Clinton adviser knowingly removed the handwritten notes by placing them in his jacket and pants and inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio
What LEGITIMATE reason can someone come up with for the former NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR to stuff the most TOP SECRET documents there are into your pants? I wonder if they have any video taping in the archive?
What LEGITIMATE reason can someone come up with for the former NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR to stuff the most TOP SECRET documents there are into your pants? I wonder if they have any video taping in the archive?
Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:45 a.m. EDT
Lawmen Contradict Berger's Sox Docs Denials
Law enforcement officials are contradicting denials from Sandy Berger's lawyer and two friends who say the former national security adviser never stuffed super-secret 9/11 documents into his socks during three or more visits to the National Archives last fall.
Reports CNN's Bob Franken: "Three law enforcement sources talking to CNN's Justice Department correspondent Kelli Arena [say] they saw him, or that he had been seen, putting documents in his socks."
Story Continues Below
Earlier in the day, Berger's lawyer Lanny Breuer dismissed allegations that his client had crammed the secret files into his pants and socks, calling those reports "ridiculous."
Former Clinton press secretary Joe Lockhart challenged the socks-stuffing account as well, telling CNN, "That is absurd - and anyone who says that is interested in something other than the truth."
Former Clinton White House counsel Lanny Davis bluntly rejected the socks-stuffing witnesses, saying, "I suggest that person is lying. Let's see who it is who made the comment that Sandy Berger stuffed something into his socks."
Lawmen Contradict Berger's Sox Docs Denials
Law enforcement officials are contradicting denials from Sandy Berger's lawyer and two friends who say the former national security adviser never stuffed super-secret 9/11 documents into his socks during three or more visits to the National Archives last fall.
Reports CNN's Bob Franken: "Three law enforcement sources talking to CNN's Justice Department correspondent Kelli Arena [say] they saw him, or that he had been seen, putting documents in his socks."
Story Continues Below
Earlier in the day, Berger's lawyer Lanny Breuer dismissed allegations that his client had crammed the secret files into his pants and socks, calling those reports "ridiculous."
Former Clinton press secretary Joe Lockhart challenged the socks-stuffing account as well, telling CNN, "That is absurd - and anyone who says that is interested in something other than the truth."
Former Clinton White House counsel Lanny Davis bluntly rejected the socks-stuffing witnesses, saying, "I suggest that person is lying. Let's see who it is who made the comment that Sandy Berger stuffed something into his socks."
Archives Officials Stunned by Scope of Berger Theft
Officials at the National Archives were stunned to learn how much top secret material Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger had purloined from a super-secure reading room set up for the 9/11 Commission probe - when Berger returned documents last fall that they didn't even know he'd taken.
"Sources tell us that Archives staff noticed documents missing after one of Mr. Berger's visits," reports Wednesday's Wall Street Journal. "After gently raising the issue with him, they were shocked to have him return other documents they hadn't even noticed missing."
The next time Mr. Berger went to the Archives, the documents he was given were all marked - and he apparently pilfered those as well.
Over five visits to the Archives on three separate dates, Berger removed up to six copies of an after-action report on the Millennium bomb plot, which was said to be highly critical of the Clinton administration's counterterrorism failures.
At 15 pages per copy, Berger would have taken a total of 90 pages worth of Millennium reports alone - a quantity of material that defies his explanation that he had "inadvertently lifted the papers. Some of the documents were later destroyed, Berger admitted on Monday.
It's not clear whether the Archives kept a full and accurate inventory of the material made available to 9/11 witnesses like Berger. But the admission by Archives officials that he took documents they didn't even know they had suggests it may be impossible to determine what material has been lost and/or destroyed.
Officials at the National Archives were stunned to learn how much top secret material Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger had purloined from a super-secure reading room set up for the 9/11 Commission probe - when Berger returned documents last fall that they didn't even know he'd taken.
"Sources tell us that Archives staff noticed documents missing after one of Mr. Berger's visits," reports Wednesday's Wall Street Journal. "After gently raising the issue with him, they were shocked to have him return other documents they hadn't even noticed missing."
The next time Mr. Berger went to the Archives, the documents he was given were all marked - and he apparently pilfered those as well.
Over five visits to the Archives on three separate dates, Berger removed up to six copies of an after-action report on the Millennium bomb plot, which was said to be highly critical of the Clinton administration's counterterrorism failures.
At 15 pages per copy, Berger would have taken a total of 90 pages worth of Millennium reports alone - a quantity of material that defies his explanation that he had "inadvertently lifted the papers. Some of the documents were later destroyed, Berger admitted on Monday.
It's not clear whether the Archives kept a full and accurate inventory of the material made available to 9/11 witnesses like Berger. But the admission by Archives officials that he took documents they didn't even know they had suggests it may be impossible to determine what material has been lost and/or destroyed.
He was trying to cover his own and Clinton's ass. Clinton's legacy is 9/11 as well as the idea of using an interns twat as an ashtray. Beautiful timing here I have to admit on the part of the republicans. Kerry has been endorsed now by another member of the communist party as well. Traitors are amongst us and they are the democratic party. That Dan Quayle wannabe does nothing but yell, just because he has the gift of "channeling" does he think the rest of us are deaf?
"Keep the Cowboy 2004"
"Keep the Cowboy 2004"
As a democrat, I'm wondering just what I would think if Ms. Rice and done the same thing.
I don't think Mr. Berger is a Clinton piece of trash as described above. In fact, I believe that he is mostly respected by both parties in Washington.
Reguardless, a person of his background should positively know the rules as to the removal of documents (top secret or not) from the Archieves. He should get the same kind of treatment from the media (left or right) that Ms. Rice had she done that same thing.
I don't think Mr. Berger is a Clinton piece of trash as described above. In fact, I believe that he is mostly respected by both parties in Washington.
Reguardless, a person of his background should positively know the rules as to the removal of documents (top secret or not) from the Archieves. He should get the same kind of treatment from the media (left or right) that Ms. Rice had she done that same thing.
To compare Berger to Rice is not fair. To Berger that is. Imagine if Condi were to walk into the National Archives, during that time of the month, and slipped some paper into her... well you get the point. These papers, if returned, will be "sticky" and probably be so deteriorated from the urinary incompetence eunich Berger. Berger and Clinton appeased every terrorist nation and that is just piss.
