**Breaking News** "International Address" Leaked from the Azores Summit

Search
Developing...

"Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons... The international community had good reason to set this requirement. Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.

The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again... Iraq has failed to turn over virtually all the documents requested by the [U.N.] inspectors. Indeed, we know that Iraq ordered the destruction of weapons-related documents in anticipation of an inspection. So Iraq has abused its final chance...

That is why, on the unanimous recommendation of my national security team -- including the vice president, the secretary of defense, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, the secretary of state and the national security adviser -- I [will] order
a strong, sustained series of air strikes against Iraq... We are delivering a powerful message to Saddam... Prime Minister Tony Blair of Great Britain and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar concurred that now is the time to strike...

The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world. The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently.

The decision to use force is never cost-free. Whenever American forces are placed in harm's way, we risk the loss of life. And while our strikes are focused on Iraq's military capabilities, there will be unintended Iraqi casualties... Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future.

Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them... But once more, the United States has proven that although we are never eager to use force, when we must act in America's vital interests, we will do so... May God bless and protect the brave men and women who are carrying out this vital mission and their families. And may God bless America."

- - -
"This is the business we've chosen." - Hyman Roth
 
Points Dems & Repubs can all agree on:

>Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or
>the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons

>left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again
>Saddam will strike again at his neighbors

>now is the time to strike

>best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new
>Iraqi government

- - -
"This is the business we've chosen." - Hyman Roth
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Where did you get that about the air strikes??? I watched the address, no mention of that, just this from Fox:

Bush: Monday Is 'Moment of Truth for the World'

LAJES, Azores Islands — President Bush met with allied leaders in an Atlantic island summit on Sunday and said "tomorrow is a moment of truth for the world" in the effort to disarm Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

He urged other nations to support "the immediate and unconditional disarmament" of the Iraqi leader.

"Iraq's liberation would be the beginning, not the end of our commitment to the Iraqi people," the president said at a news conference with the leaders of Great Britain, Spain and Portugal by his side.

The four men met at an American air base in the Azores, Portuguese territory in the Atlantic Ocean.

They gathered with more than 250,000 troops gathered in the Persian Gulf area poised to strike if and when the president gave the word.
 
>Where did you get that about the air strikes?

I guess it's the President's address to the nation

- - -
"This is the business we've chosen." - Hyman Roth
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
We shall see tomorrow night - one way to deal with Dominique is to ignore him
icon_smile.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
87
Tokens
FSB,
Just another delusion of the "we must go it alone conservative beacause our 'fearless
truth laden' leader wills it so" minnions that BLINDLY believe everything that comes from their side. I, for one, and I wish for so many others, am certainlty "NOT" part of "the everyone can agree on" 'now is the time to strike' minority!
 
>minnions that BLINDLY believe everything
>that comes from their side

What is this guy, Tom_Henry, talking about?

- - -
"This is the business we've chosen." - Hyman Roth
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Once the conflict begins, France becomes completely toothless - Chirac is silly in thinking a deadline of any length has any meaning without the threat of force, just insane. The French government is already past the point of being irrelevant - they're a few days from having that point driven home.

=============================================

PARIS — President Jacques Chirac showed no sign Sunday of backing down from his opposition to a U.S.-led war in Iraq, saying in a "60 Minutes" interview that France "will naturally go to the end" in refusing to endorse military action.

The interview was conducted before President Bush and his top allies said at an Atlantic island summit that they would make a final push Monday to convince other nations -- notably France -- to back war if Saddam Hussein does not immediately turn over weapons of mass destruction.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair, speaking with reporters on his plane en route from the Azores summit back to London, said British diplomats would work through the night trying to persuade France to lift its veto threat of a war resolution at the United Nations.

In the "60 Minutes" interview, Chirac sought to ease the anger sweeping through America over France's refusal to align itself with Washington over Iraq.

"I want to say that France and I have always been friends of the United States," Chirac said in a rare American television interview. But "we will naturally go to the end with our refusal" to endorse military action, he said.

Unless U.N. weapons inspectors reported that they no longer could do their job due to Iraqi interference, France would not support a second U.N. resolution clearing the way for war, he said.

But Chirac did say he was willing to accept a 30-day deadline for Saddam to disarm, provided the deadline was sanctioned by the inspectors -- backing away from a 120-day period outlined in a France-Germany-Russia memorandum submitted to the Security Council.

Vice President Dick Cheney, however, immediately rejected the idea, saying "it's difficult to take the French seriously and believe this is anything other than just further delaying tactics."

France has staunchly opposed any deadline for Iraq that would include an automatic trigger for war, and last week it helped stymie a U.S.-led resolution for such an ultimatum. Its stance is supported by Germany, Russia and China.

The White House called the summit in the Azores islands just after that failure at the Security Council. The council was to meet Monday to discuss the proposal by France, Germany and Russia calling for more time for inspections.

Alluding to White House and congressional frustration over French threats to veto any U.N. resolution opening the way for war, Chirac said France "will not use its right of veto to annoy the United States."

"Simply, we believe there is another way, a more normal way, less dramatic than war" to ensure that Iraq is free of weapons of mass destruction, he said.

"Important progress has been made (in the inspection process), everyday Iraqi arms are being destroyed."

Chirac denied that his threat to use France's veto had poisoned the disarmament process and handed a victory to Saddam.

"As you might observe, there is not a majority for war in the Security Council," he said. "Therefore, there is no veto problem because there is no majority to start a war."
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,796
Messages
13,573,204
Members
100,869
Latest member
yaseenamrez
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com