Marathon, not a spring fading Lang.
2018 ... -119.5 Dimes
2017 ... -499.5 Dimes
2016 ... -2,941.5 Dimes
2015 ... -181 Dimes
2014 ... -113.75 Dimes
2013 ... -929 Dimes
That's just Lang ... there are a handful of guys that share their personal plays daily in forum world that are Excellent fades. Not naming names, don't want to scare them away from posting. Keep your eye out and you can easily find them.
Saying that fading is a ridiculous approach to gambling is an absolute Clueless statement
-119.5 dimes
is that NFL only, or all football, or all sports?
doesn't he wager 40D, 80D, 100D per game (Super Bowl 200D)? So you are going against him in the Super Bowl based on his -119.5 dimes? Depending on his sample size (NFL, all football, all sports) the -119.5 dimes is all juice or possibly just one bet under break even
I completely understand this.
Perhaps if you bet against him every game, it will continue to work, sure.
BUT ONE GAME, THE SUPER BOWL, going against him is not statistically the way to go...
Eagles: teams with the distinctly better D have done very well ATS in the playoffs, dogs have done well this year, the Eagles have a superior top running game "per attempt" with 2 top RB's vs the rather poor NE running D per attempt, the artificial surface will enhance Eagles superior front 7 speed and it's pass rush... NE OL will be exposed, Foles will be more accurate, better in a dome... he is vastly underrated this will narrow the QB gap, Eagles have better OL, Eagles have better front 7, Eagles beat better teams (Atl & NO) than NE (Tenn & Jax), Eagles coach is top notch. NFC is better than the AFC this year.
Sure Brady and Belicheat are the best. And they cheat. Still, take the points, ignore Lang in this spot.
GL!