Bozo the Carroll USC myopia at it's best

[whormoan]

Everyone asks USC coach Pete Carroll about how his top-ranked Trojans are going to keep from getting bored and yawning their way through a nine-game Pac-10 schedule.

"What would we address about that? We have a ridiculously difficult schedule going through the conference."


"Ridiculously difficult". If he said that with a straight face he should get the academy award. What would he say about a legit SEC schedule then

 

[whormoan]

Mark May concurs

 

[Basket Case]

Pete Carrol = Bozo?

 

[COVERIT!]

Everyone asks USC coach Pete Carroll about how his top-ranked Trojans are going to keep from getting bored and yawning their way through a nine-game Pac-10 schedule.

"What would we address about that? We have a ridiculously difficult schedule going through the conference."


"Ridiculously difficult". If he said that with a straight face he should get the academy award. What would he say about a legit SEC schedule then

You're not talking the legit OOC SEC schedule are you? :nohead:

Glad to see your man love for Pete is still kicking, you can't stand to not have him in your mouth.

 

[3peet]

oh boy...Whoreman back at it again.

LOL. how's it goin man?

 

[whormoan]

You're not talking the legit OOC SEC schedule are you? :nohead:

Glad to see your man love for Pete is still kicking, you can't stand to not have him in your mouth.

No, I'm talking about the week-week grind that USC never has faced

 

[whormoan]

Everyone asks USC coach Pete Carroll about how his top-ranked Trojans are going to keep from getting bored and yawning their way through a nine-game Pac-10 schedule.

"What would we address about that? We have a ridiculously difficult schedule going through the conference."


"Ridiculously difficult". If he said that with a straight face he should get the academy award. What would he say about a legit SEC schedule then

I guess this was what Bozo was referring to when he referenced a "ridiculously difficult schedule"

 

[EveryGamblersDream]

I guess this was what Bozo was referring to when he referenced a "ridiculously difficult schedule"

Prior to tonight & the Ohio State BEATDOWN:

Since the 2002-2003 season, USC has only lost 8 times & only 2 were to OOC opponents. Of the 2 losses, only 1 was during the regular season & that was back on September 21, 2002 when they lost 27-20 to Kansas State in Manhattan.

Lets look deeper at the losses:

2002-2003:

Kansas State 27-20 (Road)

Washington State 30-27 OT (Road)

2003-2004:

California 34-31 3 OT (Road)

2005-2006:

Texas 41-38 (Rose Bowl)

2006-2007:

Oregon State 33-31 (Road)

UCLA 13-9 (Road)

2007-2008:

Stanford 24-23 (Home)

Oregon 24-17 (Road)


Now lets take a look at their OOC wins over those same seasons:

2002-2003:

Auburn 24-17 (Home)

Colorado 40-3 (Road)

Notre Dame 44-13 (Home)

Iowa 38-17 (Orange Bowl)


2003-2004:

Auburn 23-0 (Road)

BYU 35-18 (Home)

Hawaii 61-32 (Home)

Notre Dame 45-14 (Road)

Michigan 28-14 (Rose Bowl)


2004-2005:

Virginia Tech 24-13 (Neutral although in Maryland so closer to VT)

Colorado State 49-0 (Home)

BYU 42-10 (Road)

Notre Dame 41-10 (Home)

Oklahoma 55-19 (Orange Bowl; remember this game well as I lost 5 figures on Oklahoma!)


2005-2006:

Hawaii 63-17 (Road)

Arkansas 70-0 (Home)

Notre Dame 34-31 (Road)

Fresno State 50-42 (Home)


2006-2007:

Arkansas 50-14 (Road)

Nebraska 28-10 (Home)

Notre Dame 44-24 (Home)

Michigan 32-18 (Rose Bowl)


2007-2008:

Idaho 38-10 (Home)

Nebraska 49-31 (Road)

Notre Dame 38-0 (Road)

Illinois 49-17 (Rose Bowl)


No one & I mean no one in the SEC has come close to playing the OOC USC has. USC would be better off with more OOC opponents as clearly their bugaboo is the missteps versus conference foes. They beat a team from 5 of the 6 BCS conferences with the lone exception being the Big East as no games have been played between the two.

In the 8 losses they had, not one of them were they blown out or outclassed. In every single one they played subpar games & still almost won. These are facts, not opinions. I'd invite anyone to go watch the tapes of every single game & prove otherwise.

You can say all the shit you want but once again the facts blow your idiocy out of the water. OOC games are pieces of cake for USC but familiar foes tend to give them better games.

Save the comeback of Bozo this, Bozo that as once again you can't produce FACTS to support your argument of the Pac 10 being an easy conference.

 

[hippieki11er]

Solid post EGD. The first half of tonight's game was the first time PC has ever lost where the team looked flat-out dominated. Outside of that, every loss can be blamed on USC themselves.

 

[whormoan]

Prior to tonight & the Ohio State BEATDOWN:

Since the 2002-2003 season, USC has only lost 8 times & only 2 were to OOC opponents. Of the 2 losses, only 1 was during the regular season & that was back on September 21, 2002 when they lost 27-20 to Kansas State in Manhattan.

Lets look deeper at the losses:

2002-2003:

Kansas State 27-20 (Road)

Washington State 30-27 OT (Road)

2003-2004:

California 34-31 3 OT (Road)

2005-2006:

Texas 41-38 (Rose Bowl)

2006-2007:

Oregon State 33-31 (Road)

UCLA 13-9 (Road)

2007-2008:

Stanford 24-23 (Home)

Oregon 24-17 (Road)


Now lets take a look at their OOC wins over those same seasons:

2002-2003:

Auburn 24-17 (Home)

Colorado 40-3 (Road)

Notre Dame 44-13 (Home)

Iowa 38-17 (Orange Bowl)


2003-2004:

Auburn 23-0 (Road)

BYU 35-18 (Home)

Hawaii 61-32 (Home)

Notre Dame 45-14 (Road)

Michigan 28-14 (Rose Bowl)


2004-2005:

Virginia Tech 24-13 (Neutral although in Maryland so closer to VT)

Colorado State 49-0 (Home)

BYU 42-10 (Road)

Notre Dame 41-10 (Home)

Oklahoma 55-19 (Orange Bowl; remember this game well as I lost 5 figures on Oklahoma!)


2005-2006:

Hawaii 63-17 (Road)

Arkansas 70-0 (Home)

Notre Dame 34-31 (Road)

Fresno State 50-42 (Home)


2006-2007:

Arkansas 50-14 (Road)

Nebraska 28-10 (Home)

Notre Dame 44-24 (Home)

Michigan 32-18 (Rose Bowl)


2007-2008:

Idaho 38-10 (Home)

Nebraska 49-31 (Road)

Notre Dame 38-0 (Road)

Illinois 49-17 (Rose Bowl)


No one & I mean no one in the SEC has come close to playing the OOC USC has. USC would be better off with more OOC opponents as clearly their bugaboo is the missteps versus conference foes. They beat a team from 5 of the 6 BCS conferences with the lone exception being the Big East as no games have been played between the two.

In the 8 losses they had, not one of them were they blown out or outclassed. In every single one they played subpar games & still almost won. These are facts, not opinions. I'd invite anyone to go watch the tapes of every single game & prove otherwise.

You can say all the shit you want but once again the facts blow your idiocy out of the water. OOC games are pieces of cake for USC but familiar foes tend to give them better games.

Save the comeback of Bozo this, Bozo that as once again you can't produce FACTS to support your argument of the Pac 10 being an easy conference.

Here's a fact: the pathetic Mt West is 5-0 against the Pac ZERO this yr. USC has to schedule real teams out of conference b/c their conference schedule is such an absolute joke. SEC teams are excused from doing so because they bludgeon the shit out of each other. Maybe you haven't crawled out from under your rock, but you might have noticed last week that a conference (the SEC) had 5 teams in the top 10 for the 1st time EVER

 

[EveryGamblersDream]

Here's a fact: the pathetic Mt West is 5-0 against the Pac ZERO this yr. USC has to schedule real teams out of conference b/c their conference schedule is such an absolute joke. SEC teams are excused from doing so because they bludgeon the shit out of each other. Maybe you haven't crawled out from under your rock, but you might have noticed last week that a conference (the SEC) had 5 teams in the top 10 for the 1st time EVER

Once again bring facts to support your long term argument. You say the Pac 10 is so weak yet only they seem to be able to give USC trouble if you call under 10 losses in an era trouble. OOC teams have done jack shit against the Trojans.

Also don't pick & choose the polls to help you out. You gloat about the polls having 5 SEC teams ranked in the top 10 yet want to criticize the SAME EXACT polls for having USC #1. As usual you trip over your own words.