How many were public dogs though? I'd venture to say zero in night games. Atlanta is publicNight games.....dogs are 21-9
Agree on spotting 6 on average team, but if other team is worse than average? Patterson out for Atl. Call me crazy. I like NE tonight. Not big $, just for a little action
BOL 2 all
its not sharp, its contrarian. sharps like patsTheSharpPlays
Public money is HEAVY to New England, but sharp action medium to Atlanta at +7 (TSP Live Radar 71). It’s the sharp action which is preventing this game from being a book need.
a play is a play is a play. theyll get bet the same . otherwise you loselol
Who are the "sharps" you know betting the Pats and betting them big then?
Don’t bother with cigar, he’s saying things without supporting any of it. He doesn’t even know what O20.5 NO TT means as a play. So any info he provides take with a grain of salt. Cigar, all we are asking is where are you getting your information from?lol
Who are the "sharps" you know betting the Pats and betting them big then?
sorry pal i dont play gimmicks. find your own information since youre snide.Don’t bother with cigar, he’s saying things without supporting any of it. He doesn’t even know what O20.5 NO TT means as a play. So any info he provides take with a grain of salt. Cigar, all we are asking is where are you getting your information from?
Don't know. Heard stat on nfl chanel. My guess, teams getting points, at kick off. Easier to track. I'll be honest I try to avoid iron clad rules in betting. E.g., always bet teams public likes 30% or less. Home dogs used to be money, 27-33 this yr. Few years back, teams before bye, were hotter than teams after the bye. As an MD, you don't want to be first or last to utilize a treatment. Same thing with investments. I think rules in betting are similar.How many were public dogs though? I'd venture to say zero in night games. Atlanta is public
Well said sir!Don't know. Heard stat on nfl chanel. My guess, teams getting points, at kick off. Easier to track. I'll be honest I try to avoid iron clad rules in betting. E.g., always bet teams public likes 30% or less. Home dogs used to be money, 27-33 this yr. Few years back, teams before bye, were hotter than teams after the bye. As an MD, you don't want to be first or last to utilize a treatment. Same thing with investments. I think rules in betting are similar.
I tend to be a cynic at heart. And the degree to which parity, dogs covering, close games and the NFL's wild popularity, top show on 5 networks etc, all seems a bit too convenient. We all turn off routs. Lost ad dollars. We all scratch our heads at some calls by refs. What if all of that is connected? Coincidence 11 teams in AFC have 5 or 6 wins?
Think. Digest all the data you can. Look at what the conventional wisdom is, then see if it fits your data. Which is why I enjoy the RX.
bol guys
Best of Luck. The best you can do is stay in your own head. these guys misuse words like sharp and square regularly. Know what the line should be. Sharp takes advantage of weak numbers, not wishful thinking on incompetent teams and coaching.Don't know. Heard stat on nfl chanel. My guess, teams getting points, at kick off. Easier to track. I'll be honest I try to avoid iron clad rules in betting. E.g., always bet teams public likes 30% or less. Home dogs used to be money, 27-33 this yr. Few years back, teams before bye, were hotter than teams after the bye. As an MD, you don't want to be first or last to utilize a treatment. Same thing with investments. I think rules in betting are similar.
I tend to be a cynic at heart. And the degree to which parity, dogs covering, close games and the NFL's wild popularity, top show on 5 networks etc, all seems a bit too convenient. We all turn off routs. Lost ad dollars. We all scratch our heads at some calls by refs. What if all of that is connected? Coincidence 11 teams in AFC have 5 or 6 wins?
Think. Digest all the data you can. Look at what the conventional wisdom is, then see if it fits your data. Which is why I enjoy the RX.
bol guys