not knocking the guy. I'm only saying if you are JUST noticing a guy getting hot, you've missed the boat on the run. You can applaud the hot run but I wouldn't jump on board now. The odds are against you that it'll continue and instead his record will regress back towards his historical norm.
You should know that if you've been around Rx for 11 years.
You are knocking him.
If you think he will regress to his historical norm you should fade all of his picks.
Yes I have been a member for 11 years, and as you can see I rarely post. Probably because of replies like yours.
I posted to help others here. I am sorry you felt the need to knock the guys picks. "unfortunately he went 101-114 in the regular season for 47%." Yes this is knocking his picks. I am sure that those who followed his picks yesterday are also sorry as they went 4-0. Its too bad they probably "missed the boat."
everyone can be B Walters or a complete mush in a short variance of bets
I beg to differ
my point was he IS a mush historically who is on a really amazing hot run right now.
If you are going to indulge, bet all his bowl picks and then walk away, that's all I'm saying. Who is even betting on what a newspaper columnist is putting out there? There are thousands like this around the country and of course you are going to find one guy who got super hot on a B Walters run, like I wrote above. Small variance. His bigger variance says 47% for the entire regular season.
I sure as hell wouldn't put any money on someone who historically is a loser. Who bets on someone's stuff without looking at how they've done historically. Every big thread we have on Rx involves many posters saying "How did you do this year or historically in the bowl/tournament/playoffs?" I'm not the only one who thinks smart like this.
I'm done replying to this thread, there are two of them.
If you are going to indulge, bet all his bowl picks and then walk away, that's all I'm saying. Who is even betting on what a newspaper columnist is putting out there? There are thousands like this around the country and of course you are going to find one guy who got super hot on a B Walters run, like I wrote above. Small variance. His bigger variance says 47% for the entire regular season.
I sure as hell wouldn't put any money on someone who historically is a loser. Who bets on someone's stuff without looking at how they've done historically. Every big thread we have on Rx involves many posters saying "How did you do this year or historically in the bowl/tournament/playoffs?" I'm not the only one who thinks smart like this.
I'm done replying to this thread, there are two of them.
