Shrink: "To suggest that BLUEGRASS is in any financial hardship is assanine and irresponsible..."
Ignoring for the moment that the book in question was Bluegrass, this kind of suggestion was inevitable due to the information posted by Joey C., and your response to it, yesterday. I'm not questioning anyone's motives, what I am saying is that posting vague warnings about 2 unnamed books is akin to yelling 'fire!' in a crowded theater - a lot of people panic or overreact, and unfairly good books get tarred and feathered in the process. Whether or not the person posting about BG had an axe to grind, the door was flung open.
By not naming Bluegrass as a good book, you opened the floodgates for speculation, and then you say that it's 'irresponsible' for people to speculate on their financial condition. Without rancor, I submit that there is a lot of irresponsibility in this whole situation, and as someone else pointed out, a lot of money ain't going to the suspect CR books this weekend until the book is cleared or named.
Is there a better way to handle it? I don't know, maybe - next time perhaps simply don't respond or post anything until you know what's what. When someone with your standing posts that 2 unnamed books may be in trouble, fallout was inevitable. IMHO.
p.s. If you are now willing to say BG wasn't one of the books in question after they got slammed, why didn't you say that before they got slammed? For that matter, why not name the books you know for a fact are okay, to avoid this problem?