The current line is New England -4 or -4.5 with a total of 48.
My first thoughts on this game was that I will always take an excellent defense getting points. Its a standard that has served me well for many years, and when combined with a solid running game is even stronger. Both teams allow the same amount of points, and the Eagles have a solid net rushing advantage. Looking at these two factors I would take Philadelphia most of the time. But nothing is 100%, so lets look at this game a little deeper.
Lets start with the Philadelphia offense, with the loss of Wentz obviously a huge factor. Now Foles just had a great game vs Minnesota, and the public is often fixated on what they just saw. I want to focus on what this offense has done with Foles at the helm. They beat the NYG 34-29 throwing 4 TDS and 233 yards. They were helped by 2 short fields caused by a pick and a blocked punt. They ran for 108. It was a solid performance against a pathetic defense. It was far from a dominating offensive display despite scoring 34 points.
That was followed by the MNF game vs Oakland, another bad team. It was a cold game at night, not the greatest scoring conditions but nothing that a good offense couldn’t overcome. They basically scored 13 points, helped by short fields. They threw for 163 and ran for 21-78 against a team with an average defense at best. Then they played Dallas in a nothing game that had very cold weather getting shut out. I’ll excuse that game but they also did absolutely nothing in that game.
Playoffs and they score 15 against Atlanta. A decent offensive game yardage wise but again only 15 points. Then the Minnesota blowout. Now many will point to this game and say look how great this offense played vs an elite defense. I thought it was a lot of bad Minnesota along with good Philadelphia. I saw many defensive breakdowns that were not indicative of the way that defense played all year. After the Pick 6 by Philly the Minnesota defense was pressing, eyes in the backfield, trying too hard to match the Philadelphia score. They got away from what they did all year long. Receivers were constantly getting behind the defense, and they acted like they had never seen a RPO before. Folks hit that little slant pass over and over. Look, Philadelphia played a great all around game, helped by a lot of bad Minnesota. It was a perfect storm for a blowout. Full credit to the Eagles for a tremendous game, but that wasn't the Minnesota defense I watched all year long. They were also dinged a bit in the secondary too.
The Philadelphia defense is one of the best in the NFL. 4th in total defense, 5th in 1st down allowed, 3rd in 3rd down %, 7th in penalties. But while they are the top rushing defense they are just 17th in pass defense which is something that the Pats obviously excel in. For all the talk about their pass rush they are 17th in sacks. Tied for 26th in INTs. 13th in Def Comp %, they do rank 3rd in YPA.
Lets look at home/road splits. They allow 17.3/game overall but away from home that rises to 23.5. Lets look at their home and away points allowed. Road games in BOLD.
My first thoughts on this game was that I will always take an excellent defense getting points. Its a standard that has served me well for many years, and when combined with a solid running game is even stronger. Both teams allow the same amount of points, and the Eagles have a solid net rushing advantage. Looking at these two factors I would take Philadelphia most of the time. But nothing is 100%, so lets look at this game a little deeper.
Lets start with the Philadelphia offense, with the loss of Wentz obviously a huge factor. Now Foles just had a great game vs Minnesota, and the public is often fixated on what they just saw. I want to focus on what this offense has done with Foles at the helm. They beat the NYG 34-29 throwing 4 TDS and 233 yards. They were helped by 2 short fields caused by a pick and a blocked punt. They ran for 108. It was a solid performance against a pathetic defense. It was far from a dominating offensive display despite scoring 34 points.
That was followed by the MNF game vs Oakland, another bad team. It was a cold game at night, not the greatest scoring conditions but nothing that a good offense couldn’t overcome. They basically scored 13 points, helped by short fields. They threw for 163 and ran for 21-78 against a team with an average defense at best. Then they played Dallas in a nothing game that had very cold weather getting shut out. I’ll excuse that game but they also did absolutely nothing in that game.
Playoffs and they score 15 against Atlanta. A decent offensive game yardage wise but again only 15 points. Then the Minnesota blowout. Now many will point to this game and say look how great this offense played vs an elite defense. I thought it was a lot of bad Minnesota along with good Philadelphia. I saw many defensive breakdowns that were not indicative of the way that defense played all year. After the Pick 6 by Philly the Minnesota defense was pressing, eyes in the backfield, trying too hard to match the Philadelphia score. They got away from what they did all year long. Receivers were constantly getting behind the defense, and they acted like they had never seen a RPO before. Folks hit that little slant pass over and over. Look, Philadelphia played a great all around game, helped by a lot of bad Minnesota. It was a perfect storm for a blowout. Full credit to the Eagles for a tremendous game, but that wasn't the Minnesota defense I watched all year long. They were also dinged a bit in the secondary too.
The Philadelphia defense is one of the best in the NFL. 4th in total defense, 5th in 1st down allowed, 3rd in 3rd down %, 7th in penalties. But while they are the top rushing defense they are just 17th in pass defense which is something that the Pats obviously excel in. For all the talk about their pass rush they are 17th in sacks. Tied for 26th in INTs. 13th in Def Comp %, they do rank 3rd in YPA.
Lets look at home/road splits. They allow 17.3/game overall but away from home that rises to 23.5. Lets look at their home and away points allowed. Road games in BOLD.
Date | Opponent | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Yds | RYPA | Yds | PYPA | Yds | RYPA | Yds | PYPA |
1-21-18 | vs MINNESOTA | 3 | 39 | 38-7 | W | W | O | 110 | 3.7 | 346 | 10.5 | 70 | 3.9 | 263 | 5.5 |
1-13-18 | vs ATLANTA | 2.5 | 40 | 15-10 | W | W | U | 96 | 3.0 | 238 | 7.9 | 86 | 4.3 | 195 | 5.4 |
12-31-17 | vs DALLAS | 4 | 41 | 0-6 | L | L | U | 70 | 3.9 | 149 | 4.4 | 129 | 4.0 | 172 | 5.7 |
12-25-17 | vs OAKLAND | -10 | 45.5 | 19-10 | W | L | U | 78 | 3.7 | 138 | 3.6 | 137 | 4.2 | 137 | 4.7 |
12-17-17 | at NY GIANTS | -7 | 41 | 34-29 | W | L | O | 108 | 4.0 | 233 | 9.7 | 75 | 3.3 | 429 | 11.6 |
12-10-17 | at LA RAMS | -1 | 47 | 43-35 | W | W | O | 139 | 4.3 | 316 | 10.9 | 109 | 6.4 | 198 | 12.4 |
12-3-17 | at SEATTLE | -3.5 | 47 | 10-24 | L | L | U | 98 | 3.8 | 327 | 11.3 | 101 | 4.0 | 209 | 10.5 |
11-26-17 | vs CHICAGO | -14 | 43.5 | 31-3 | W | W | U | 176 | 5.3 | 244 | 6.3 | 6 | 0.4 | 134 | 4.1 |
11-19-17 | at DALLAS | -6 | 48 | 37-9 | W | W | U | 215 | 6.5 | 168 | 12.0 | 112 | 4.1 | 113 | 6.3 |
11-5-17 | vs DENVER | -7 | 41 | 51-23 | W | W | O | 197 | 5.3 | 222 | 7.9 | 35 | 1.8 | 191 | 5.0 |
10-29-17 | vs SAN FRANCISCO | -13 | 45 | 33-10 | W | W | U | 112 | 3.6 | 192 | 6.0 | 94 | 3.9 | 144 | 4.0 |
10-23-17 | vs WASHINGTON | -4.5 | 48.5 | 34-24 | W | W | O | 127 | 3.8 | 244 | 9.8 | 75 | 4.2 | 269 | 6.7 |
10-12-17 | at CAROLINA | 3 | 44 | 28-23 | W | W | O | 101 | 3.7 | 209 | 13.1 | 80 | 3.2 | 225 | 8.0 |
10-8-17 | vs ARIZONA | -6 | 44.5 | 34-7 | W | W | U | 122 | 3.7 | 297 | 9.9 | 31 | 2.2 | 276 | 6.3 |
10-1-17 | at LA CHARGERS | 2 | 47.5 | 26-24 | W | W | O | 214 | 5.1 | 240 | 14.1 | 58 | 4.5 | 342 | 15.5 |
9-24-17 | vs NY GIANTS | -5 | 42 | 27-24 | W | L | O | 193 | 4.9 | 161 | 5.2 | 49 | 2.9 | 366 | 7.8 |
9-17-17 | at KANSAS CITY | 46.5 | 20-27 | L | L | O | 107 | 6.3 | 299 | 12.0 | 112 | 5.9 | 232 | 11.0 | |
9-10-17 | at WASHINGTON | -2 | 49 | 30-17 |