Bill Clinton's social housing policy destroyed the economy, not Wall Street and George. W. Bush

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,344
Tokens
Clinton Housing Policy Wrecked Economy, Not 1%

113 Comments

E
lection '16:
With typical gall, Hillary Clinton in her campaign launch lit into "those at the top" for "stacking" the deck against middle-class families when in fact they are buried under the house of cards built by her husband.

Earth to Hillary: It wasn't the richest 1% or Wall Street bankers who crashed the economy and created the financial wreckage from which working Americans "have fought" to dig themselves out of. No, that path to destruction was set by Bill Clinton and his social housing policies.

The evidence is overwhelming that Clinton was the architect of the financial disaster that wiped out trillions of dollars in household wealth. Under his National Homeownership Strategy, Clinton took more than 100 executive actions to pry bank lending windows wide open.


Through executive order, he marshaled 10 federal agencies under a little-known task force to enforce new "flexible" mortgage underwriting guidelines to boost low-income and minority homeownership.


For the first time, banks were ordered to qualify low-income borrowers with spotty credit. The 1994 policy planted the seeds of the mortgage crisis, as lenders eventually abandoned prudent underwriting altogether.


The next year, Clinton set quotas for lending in high-risk neighborhoods under an overhauled Community Reinvestment Act, while adding several hundred bank examiners to enforce the tougher CRA rules. Banks that came up short had expansion plans put on hold — a slow death sentence in an era of bank mergers and acquisitions.


For the first time, CRA ratings were made public, egging on ACORN and other radical inner-city groups, which used the reports to extort banks for $6 trillion in subprime loan set-asides by 2008.


When bankers resisted being saddled with so many risky loans, Clinton tapped Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to take them off their books, while freeing bankers to originate more of the political loans. He had the Department of Housing and Urban Development nearly double Fannie's and Freddie's quotas for underwriting "affordable" loans, which remained in force throughout the 2000s.


When the mortgage giants pushed back, complaining that it would be hard to meet the higher targets, Clinton pushed them to load up on subprime loans, while authorizing Fannie and Freddie for the first time to buy subprime securities to earn credits toward the HUD goals. The mortgage giants complied to their great detriment.


So Clinton was also responsible for securitizing these loans which combined bad loans with good loans in packages that were sold to Wall Street institutions, including insurance companies. The mix of these junk loans made it impossible for investors to tell good ones from bad, and the markets eventually seized up and crashed.


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...of-housing-financial-crisis.htm#ixzz3XZsTURcR
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,344
Tokens
The worst part? The "social justice" warriors are at it again.

"The Community Reinvestment Act is intended to encourage depository institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound operations."

http://www.federalreserve.gov/communitydev/cra_about.htm

Question:

WHY THE FUCK DOES THE GOVERNMENT NEED A "COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT" IN THE FIRST PLACE???

:>(
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
President George W Bush--- 2000-2008

9/11 attack in 2001.....Clintons fault

Economic Collapse 2007.... Clintons fault.

Bin Laden killed 2011...... Bush credit

Conservative logic is just wonderful. The level of stupidity is unreal.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
3,255
Tokens
Why do we need Fannie and Freddie? Why do we need the Fed to feed the cheap money to make it all implode?

And yet, capitalism and free markets did, and will get the blame next time
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
President George W Bush--- 2000-2008

9/11 attack in 2001.....Clintons fault

Economic Collapse 2007.... Clintons fault.

Bin Laden killed 2011...... Bush credit

Conservative logic is just wonderful. The level of stupidity is unreal.

Hey Vitt ... Can you watch this whole 6 minute video, and let me know what you think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIjoW_IXos4
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
Clinton Housing Policy Wrecked Economy, Not 1%

113 Comments

E
lection '16:
With typical gall, Hillary Clinton in her campaign launch lit into "those at the top" for "stacking" the deck against middle-class families when in fact they are buried under the house of cards built by her husband.

Earth to Hillary: It wasn't the richest 1% or Wall Street bankers who crashed the economy and created the financial wreckage from which working Americans "have fought" to dig themselves out of. No, that path to destruction was set by Bill Clinton and his social housing policies.

The evidence is overwhelming that Clinton was the architect of the financial disaster that wiped out trillions of dollars in household wealth. Under his National Homeownership Strategy, Clinton took more than 100 executive actions to pry bank lending windows wide open.


Through executive order, he marshaled 10 federal agencies under a little-known task force to enforce new "flexible" mortgage underwriting guidelines to boost low-income and minority homeownership.


For the first time, banks were ordered to qualify low-income borrowers with spotty credit. The 1994 policy planted the seeds of the mortgage crisis, as lenders eventually abandoned prudent underwriting altogether.


The next year, Clinton set quotas for lending in high-risk neighborhoods under an overhauled Community Reinvestment Act, while adding several hundred bank examiners to enforce the tougher CRA rules. Banks that came up short had expansion plans put on hold — a slow death sentence in an era of bank mergers and acquisitions.


For the first time, CRA ratings were made public, egging on ACORN and other radical inner-city groups, which used the reports to extort banks for $6 trillion in subprime loan set-asides by 2008.


When bankers resisted being saddled with so many risky loans, Clinton tapped Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to take them off their books, while freeing bankers to originate more of the political loans. He had the Department of Housing and Urban Development nearly double Fannie's and Freddie's quotas for underwriting "affordable" loans, which remained in force throughout the 2000s.


When the mortgage giants pushed back, complaining that it would be hard to meet the higher targets, Clinton pushed them to load up on subprime loans, while authorizing Fannie and Freddie for the first time to buy subprime securities to earn credits toward the HUD goals. The mortgage giants complied to their great detriment.


So Clinton was also responsible for securitizing these loans which combined bad loans with good loans in packages that were sold to Wall Street institutions, including insurance companies. The mix of these junk loans made it impossible for investors to tell good ones from bad, and the markets eventually seized up and crashed.


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...of-housing-financial-crisis.htm#ixzz3XZsTURcR
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook
everyone knows this but many turn a blind eye to it
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Hey Vitt ... Can you watch this whole 6 minute video, and let me know what you think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIjoW_IXos4

it is a well put together selective edited video.....but ask yourself this

if an economic collapse and worst terrorist attack in our country happened in 2009 with Obama or 2017 with Hillary.....who would you hold responsible? Who would known rx far right lunatics blame? A house sub committee or the president?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
it is a well put together selective edited video.....but ask yourself this

if an economic collapse and worst terrorist attack in our country happened in 2009 with Obama or 2017 with Hillary.....who would you hold responsible? Who would known rx far right lunatics blame? A house sub committee or the president?

Depends on where the crumbs started on the path to that destruction. Got to work it backwards and see where it all started, that's how you find out who is at fault.

You can watch the whole 2 hour, unedited video if you like. Just search for it on CSPAN.....

So, what was the cause in your opinion of the financial crisis that was caused by the housing bubble? Simply Bush being in office?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Depends on where the crumbs started on the path to that destruction. Got to work it backwards and see where it all started, that's how you find out who is at fault.
So why do you think all the crumbs come back to the dems when a conservative tells the story?

It gets sickening to hear repubs stomp their feet about personal responsibility but always blame everyone but themselves

I mean look at Iran.....does anyone here care that Iran had 20 times more ability to build a nuclear weapon after the bush administration than before? Of course not. Does anyone care the mess made by the bush admin in Iraq made Iran stronger? Nope. Does anyone care that the hand picked leader of Iraq by the bush administration was a disaster? Nope. Does anyone care that Cheney said Iraq people would greet us as liberators? Nope.


The previous administration destroyed this country in so many ways but that doesn't matter to these clowns. It's all Obama and dems fault.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
So why do you think all the crumbs come back to the dems when a conservative tells the story?

It gets sickening to hear repubs stomp their feet about personal responsibility but always blame everyone but themselves

I mean look at Iran.....does anyone here care that Iran had 20 times more ability to build a nuclear weapon after the bush administration than before? Of course not. Does anyone care the mess made by the bush admin in Iraq made Iran stronger? Nope. Does anyone care that the hand picked leader of Iraq by the bush administration was a disaster? Nope. Does anyone care that Cheney said Iraq people would greet us as liberators? Nope.


The previous administration destroyed this country in so many ways but that doesn't matter to these clowns. It's all Obama and dems fault.

So where do the crumbs lead to that cause the economic housing collapse, where did it start?... you never answered.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
So where do the crumbs lead to that cause the economic housing collapse, where did it start?... you never answered.
Plenty of blame to go around. Govt housing policy, regulators, credit lenders, irresponsible consumers, financial institutions.

Now answer my questions. If 9/11 and the economic collapse happened on Obama or Hillary watch.....who would the known loons like Russ, joe, Acebb and Dave blame?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Plenty of blame to go around. Govt housing policy, regulators, credit lenders, irresponsible consumers, financial institutions.

Now answer my questions. If 9/11 and the economic collapse happened on Obama or Hillary watch.....who would the known loons like Russ, joe, Acebb and Dave blame?

So... Who was to blame for the government regulators? The housing policy? The lenders? Someone or some group had to empower all of them... So which specific group started this mess and continued it till its final collapse?

They would probably blame the person who allowed it without looking at who was actually at fault.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
So... Who was to blame for the government regulators? The housing policy? The lenders? Someone or some group had to empower all of them... So which specific group started this mess and continued it till its final collapse?

They would probably blame the person who allowed it without looking at who was actually at fault.

I assume you want me to say it was house and senate dems right? Because that's what you believe? The truth is both deserve blame.

But the buck stops with the commander in chief does it not? It certainly does for repubs when something goes wrong during a dem administration.

Didnt repubs us have the White House and congress for much of the bush presidency? What were they doing besides allowing banks to run wild? Why didn't they step in. They had control of everything for years.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
I assume you want me to say it was house and senate dems right? Because that's what you believe? The truth is both deserve blame.

But the buck stops with the commander in chief does it not? It certainly does for repubs when something goes wrong during a dem administration.

Didnt repubs us have the White House and congress for much of the bush presidency? What were they doing besides allowing banks to run wild? Why didn't they step in. They had control of everything for years.

They tried to step in numerous times... From 2003-till collapse, BUT the dem controlled housing refused to listen (videos that I posted)

I'll admit that the dems had a great idea, but let it get out of control cause they were getting so much money from salaries, bonuses and kickbacks they didn't care.

If it was done right and regulated the right way, it would have turned out differently. But with all politicians in the US as long as they are stuffing their own pockets they don't care who it hurts.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
They tried to step in numerous times... From 2003-till collapse, BUT the dem controlled housing refused to listen (videos that I posted)

I'll admit that the dems had a great idea, but let it get out of control cause they were getting so much money from salaries, bonuses and kickbacks they didn't care.

If it was done right and regulated the right way, it would have turned out differently. But with all politicians in the US as long as they are stuffing their own pockets they don't care who it hurts.
So repubs valiant effort to stop the evil housing controlled dems came up short huh? That's what you're gonna go with?

i do agree, if it was done the right way it would have turned out differently....but since when does a republican White House and republican majority congress do it the right way. Never. Let's just hope repubs don't gain full control again and we go back to losing thousands of jobs per month and trying to hold the economy together with duct tape.

i do agree that none of them care about anything but their next election and their own pocket.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
It's actually all Vitterd's fault. He hit a 10 team parley in '94 and instead of spending the money tucked it all under his mattress. The economy never recovered and this action by Vit led directly to the crash today.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
It's actually all Vitterd's fault. He hit a 10 team parley in '94 and instead of spending the money tucked it all under his mattress. The economy never recovered and this action by Vit led directly to the crash today.
It was actually 1996......but everything else is spot on.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
This makes no sense. Things were good in '96. My Travelers stock tripled.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,807
Messages
13,573,367
Members
100,871
Latest member
Legend813
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com