Seahawks are home dogs on MNF this year so the results posted are for home dogs. And if Gman knew his football he would know there were more than 28 MNF games between 1994-2021. But he doesn't.
- Status
Youre still missing the point. No need to insult me about how many MNF games there are. You only gave results for 19 of them. Youre the only who can't count. Where are the other results for the remainder of the games between those years?
Im curious what the results were for the dogs in the other games.
Do some research and maybe you'll learn something.
All Dogs? What's the Juice on these? -110? Even?
You bet games already without knowing what injuries there may be in the preseason? LOL. . Just a trend player?
If the starters all play you bet all 4 games against the better quarterbacks. LOL
Shit! You dont even know who's starting in 2 of those dogs?
Drew Lock or Geno Smith over Russel Wilson?
Coin Flip>Mitch Trubisky/Kenny Pickett/Mason Rudolph over Burrows?
Coin Flip> Marcus Mariota/Desmond Ridder over Zack Wilson?
Mac Jones over Tua Tagovailoa? That could be a tight one. You may have a chance there.. But Tago has a 67% completion percentage and thats not a bad advantage for Miami.
You also 'locked in' numbers that have moved already.
You got hosed on those.
Falcons are now +5.5. You already lost 2 points on that game. Seattle already moved to 5. another loss there?
Save your breath. The guy's an idiot.
Gman, are that STUPID. You can't come here and question somebody,with your records. I will tell you what your record in football won't even be as close as mine. Week 1 Loins, Falcons, Raiders, Seahawks, Texans and the Cowboys. I don't care if the spreads change. Oh one more thing your an asshole, how is BASEBALL going for you.
And what alias is this? Can only be one of the three.
Only someone who doesnt post plays under his other handle...LOL
"If the starters all play you bet all 4 games against the better quarterbacks. LOL"
Last year I had three winners in week one by going against the better quarterback: the Cowboys (Prescott) over the Bucs (Brady), Browns (Mayfield) over the Chiefs (Mahomes) and the Saints (Winston) over the Packers (Rodgers). There is more to handicapping then picking the "better quarterback" in a given matchup but obviously that's above your level of thinking.
Last year I had three winners in week one by going against the better quarterback: the Cowboys (Prescott) over the Bucs (Brady), Browns (Mayfield) over the Chiefs (Mahomes) and the Saints (Winston) over the Packers (Rodgers). There is more to handicapping then picking the "better quarterback" in a given matchup but obviously that's above your level of thinking.
Too bad you cant retract your bets.
If you notice - the three QB's you had last year were all better than the 4 you have this year for week one. DUH.
In addition those 4 teams are not as good as last years 3 teams you had. The
Falcons +3.5 - 1.5 units, Steelers +6.5 - 1.5 units and Seahawks +4.5 - 1.5 units
are not as good NOW as last years Cowboys, Browns and Saints were in week one last year..
Youre right - "There is more to capping than QB's". So why did you simply take the teams that you picked from trends? LOL
This year you got sucked in to the trends, instead of the potentials - because you can't make a case for any of the four now to be as competitive as those 3 others last year.
Thats how Your Level of thinking is flawed.
You dont cap because you could never have taken those 4 underdogs as a winning team except POSSIBLY the Pats and thats not all that good..
My guess is that you won't find those 4 teams on anyone else posts here in week one. Maybe one or so - but not all four.
Got any more like that to post?
BOL .
49ers under Kyle Shanahan:
Team is (40) in turnovers during the regular season.
2-21 SU & 1-22 ATS in games with a (2) T/O differential or better.
9-1 SU & 9-1 ATS in games with a +2 T/O differential or better.
Team is (40) in turnovers during the regular season.
2-21 SU & 1-22 ATS in games with a (2) T/O differential or better.
9-1 SU & 9-1 ATS in games with a +2 T/O differential or better.
Clarify what (40) is?
Is it PLUS +40 in turnover all time? Is it +40 last year on turnovers? Or Are they 4-0 when wining turnovers during games.
Are you counting on turnovers to make the bet on SF?
Name the "Contest Entree Fee". 100, 200, 500? You name it.
We each pay upfront before the contest starts. If one guy doesn't post 6 picks EACH WEEK, he is OUT and officially loses. ONLY exception is if a game is cancelled by NFL and isnt moved to the following day. If game is played next day it counts.
All bets are for 1 unit for wins and losses. All Juice counts as Money won or lost against per unit.
Two 3 unit bets for the season only Once used no more allowed.
Ties count as losses.
No ML's. No point spread buys. One set of lines that dont change for the week once they are posted. Most money won, wins.
We BOTH will pay upfront by PayPal to one of the mods that run the contests..
But all will be posted 1 day (Not Hour) in advance of game day.
WTF guys. Take your mindless challenge somewhere else.
Chiefs under Andy Reid:
Team is +88 in turnovers during the regular season.
44-2 SU & 36-10 ATS in games with a +2 T/O differential or better.
4-13 SU & 3-13-1 ATS in games with a (2) T/O differential or worse.
Team is +88 in turnovers during the regular season.
44-2 SU & 36-10 ATS in games with a +2 T/O differential or better.
4-13 SU & 3-13-1 ATS in games with a (2) T/O differential or worse.
- Status
