Big Bookie Mnf

[bigbookie]

Pitt/Balt Under 34.5

May Have A Play On Balt-not Quite Enough On Pitt Yet To Make It An Official Play-will Update

 

[UncleMush]

Thanks buddy, I like the under, but gonna stick with Pittsburgh game and half...GLTA

 

[Intruder]

people on the over....surprising to say the least.

gl2u

 

[MikRetSam]

thanks bb, damn i hate playin totals......

 

[MikRetSam]

people on the over....surprising to say the least.

gl2u

i think pub plays 90% of games over

 

[Jetplane]

well... surprising that it's 2 defensive teams... and they are playing over. that's all.

 

[CaptFlippy]

Good Luck!

 

[BORO]

i think pub plays 90% of games over

I'm one of the 10% betting unders and have lost my ass so far. Not tonight. Let's get it.

 

[UncleMush]

not surprising really. The public likes to play overs to begin with and this one is really low. People saw the other MNF games and think this is a layup. Pitts 17-Bal 7 Bank it!

 

[ca$hmoney]

well... surprising that it's 2 defensive teams... and they are playing over. that's all.

MNF final scores have been so rediculous that it would be very hard to imagine a 13-6 game.

 

[Jetplane]

MNF final scores have been so rediculous that it would be very hard to imagine a 13-6 game.

I've seen a 6-3 game before on MNF i believe... cuz i gave lines to my players as OVER 13.5 2H and those fucks *ALL* lost... the total on the game was 40+

>

By the way, PITT was one of the teams in that game... forgot who else it was.

 

[Mrbeefy1]

Thanks BB! I really think Balt is a much better team than last year...
Sh.t I hate playing the under just like everyone else. Who wants to see small drives then punt all night long?

 

[Intruder]

Someone told me that Pitt is a pretty sharp play.......(heard this from someone offshore) anyone able to confirm/deny this?

 

[Simps1207]

MNF final scores have been so rediculous that it would be very hard to imagine a 13-6 game.[/QUOTE

So because it's MNF teams score more points than usual? :think2:

 

[Intruder]

i think pub plays 90% of games over

I just meant, first look has this as a 13-10 type game....can't see Flacco having success or Ben for that matter

 

[Jetplane]

Someone told me that Pitt is a pretty sharp play.......(heard this from someone offshore) anyone able to confirm/deny this?

Well lets say when the books opened at 7..."someone" pounded it down 5. And now it's climbing back to pitt.

So i don't know... make it what you want.

I have Ravens covering and set the total at 39.

 

[bigbookie]

Well lets say when the books opened at 7..."someone" pounded it down 5. And now it's climbing back to pitt.

So i don't know... make it what you want.

I have Ravens covering and set the total at 39.

that is not true-line was adjusted to 5 due to parker not playing and has risen to 6 due to money on pitt

 

[Intruder]

Well lets say when the books opened at 7..."someone" pounded it down 5. And now it's climbing back to pitt.

So i don't know... make it what you want.

I have Ravens covering and set the total at 39.

thanks...just checking into what I heard......what are getting heavy

 

[degengambler]

hate going under anything lower than 37
probably pass

 

[Intruder]

that is not true-line was adjusted to 5 due to parker not playing and has risen to 6 due to money on pitt

thanks for the info...a thorn I know played 1st half over so.......