I thought I would get a Big 12 thread going this spring. It looks like it's going to be a very competetive conference in both divisions this year. So feel free to add your two cents or any new articles you might come across. First, I thought this was as interesting little tidbit on what Bob Davies said about the Bigt 12 in general. I can't say as I disagree with anything he says:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Had lunch with Bob Davies and Priest Holmes today. A couple of things Coach Davies said in our brief discussion.
Just thought I would pass it on.
Texas is a recruiting machine. Does not like all the early commits, but if it works who is he to say its wrong
Oklahoma is great at evaluating talent
If he had won 1 of 4 NC games like Bob Stoops he would still be the Notre Dame coach
Texas A&M messed up firing Slocum
Don't like coach in waiting scnerio. Mack Brown could pull a Joe Paterno or Bobby Bowden and stay forever. Note: he does not think that would happen though. Maybe another 5 to 10 years.
Big 12 defense was not as bad as people think, but there is no 1st or 2nd rd nfl draft talent either.
ESPN has way more influence on things than they should. Understands why the BCS needs computers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Texas A&M hasn't been the same since the Slocum days. And the book is still out on Sherman. Although he strikes me as an intelligent coach. He doesn't seem like a rah rah Brian Kelly kind of "kick in the pants" coach that most college teams need. I also think Davies was right about the Big 12 defenses. They weren't quite as bad as people think. When I look at what OU gave up in conference, and just the the 24 points they gave up against Florida in the BCS title game, it was very evident to me that the Big 12 had by far the best offenses in the country. Florida was just a very special team with a great coach, who happened to be miles better than anybody in their own conference by the end of the year. A point that maybe can be argued forever by SEC fans. But that's just my personal opinion.
Right now this is my pre-spring opinion of the Big 12. I could have a change of mind on a couple of these teams by summer. But this is how I'm feeling it now:
Big 12 South
1.Texas-In my opinion the team to beat in the South. I might be a little off on my numbers, but I'm counting 9 players coming back on offense and 8 on defense. Plus a second year defensive coordinator who should have his system fully implemented in '09. Some questions lie on the DL. But keep in mind they had some questions last season too. They used a converted RB at one of the DE positions last year. And they have some very good talent coming back this year. I actually think the Horns bigger question on defense will be their secondary. They had problems at times trying to stop the pass against teams like OU, TT and Baylor. So they'll have to improve there this year without Orakpo putting on the pass rush. Still, this could be the best offense in the nation. And I'll make a little prediction. Because of what happend last season with Texas and the BCS/Big 12 computer snubbing, Mack Brown isn't going to be Mr. Niceguy. He's going to run up the score in every game, regardless of their opponent. You can bank on it. When Texas is this good it's usually bad news for OU. Plus the Horns have an easy Big 12 schedule and a pussy OOC schedule.
2.(Tie) Oklahoma-The Sooners big question lie in the OL, WR LB positions. It makes the Sooners a little bit of a mystery team. Some lines come together faster than others. So this is one thing that not even the best prognosticators can predict. It's also going to take Bradofrd a while to get on the same page with his new WR's. One thing is probably for sure, Bradford isn't going to have 8 seconds in the pocket this season to throw the ball to whoever he wants. My bet is he's going to be tested bigtime as a QB. And he may be wishing he had gone pro when he had a chance. This is one thing I feel about 80% sure of. When you lose two cogs of your offense (WR, OL) I don't care how good you are at reloading, when you have a schedule like OU has this year, it tells me that things won't come as easy on offense. The defnese could be one of the best in the country. But I still have the same concerns that we had last season. Special teams and the LB position. These are the two things that cost OU against the Horns last season. And with the injuries that OU has had at the LB position, it puts a little doubt in my head. Especially since their star player Ryan Reynolds is still hurting and will skip spring practice. Tough call on the Sooners. They could be no better than the second or third best team in the south. Or they could be another BCS title team.
2.(Tie) OSU-Yes, I think they could be this good. Their big question will once again be defense. And their third DC in the last 4 years come in with Bill Young taking over. But you may remember him from the Kansas team who made it all the way to a BCS game in 2007. He is definitely one of the very best DC's in the country. And this alone makes me think OSU can only be better on that side of the ball. The offense could be as close or as good as Texas. This team seems to get just a bit better every year. And they definitely have their stuff together in Stillwater. Gundy has a very good system working despite losing a few coaches over the last couple of years. And the reason why is because everytime he replaces a coach it's an upgrade from the last. This team will once again be a bigtiome threat. And if their defense comes together they'll even be a big threat on the road. They move up this year.
4.Texas Tech-Although they lose their key playmakers on offense, they still return a ton of players. And Leach has recruited very well the last couple of years. The defense will be improved. The offense will be a work in progress. But if I know Leach, he'll have things figured out by fall.
5.Baylor-This is still a team that lacks the playmakers that it takes to be competetive in the South. Griffin can't do it alone. But in Briles second year I expect them to make a few strides. The Bears need more skill players. But I like the general attitude of this team under Briles. They'll have to step up and win one or two games their not supposed to win to make it to a bowl.
6.Texas A&M-The same problem as Baylor. Not enough skill players. But they have to make some big improvements on both lines, who were physically outmuscled by the big boys last season. We'll find out just how good of a coach that Sherman is this season. They get Baylor at home. So that game could deterim the cellar dwellar in the South. Sherman has recruited better than i thought he would. And he may have to use some of these "diaper dandies" right out of the chute if he hopes to compete. My feeling is they are a year away from being a bowl team.
I'll be back later with my feelings about the Big 12 north.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Had lunch with Bob Davies and Priest Holmes today. A couple of things Coach Davies said in our brief discussion.
Just thought I would pass it on.
Texas is a recruiting machine. Does not like all the early commits, but if it works who is he to say its wrong
Oklahoma is great at evaluating talent
If he had won 1 of 4 NC games like Bob Stoops he would still be the Notre Dame coach
Texas A&M messed up firing Slocum
Don't like coach in waiting scnerio. Mack Brown could pull a Joe Paterno or Bobby Bowden and stay forever. Note: he does not think that would happen though. Maybe another 5 to 10 years.
Big 12 defense was not as bad as people think, but there is no 1st or 2nd rd nfl draft talent either.
ESPN has way more influence on things than they should. Understands why the BCS needs computers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Texas A&M hasn't been the same since the Slocum days. And the book is still out on Sherman. Although he strikes me as an intelligent coach. He doesn't seem like a rah rah Brian Kelly kind of "kick in the pants" coach that most college teams need. I also think Davies was right about the Big 12 defenses. They weren't quite as bad as people think. When I look at what OU gave up in conference, and just the the 24 points they gave up against Florida in the BCS title game, it was very evident to me that the Big 12 had by far the best offenses in the country. Florida was just a very special team with a great coach, who happened to be miles better than anybody in their own conference by the end of the year. A point that maybe can be argued forever by SEC fans. But that's just my personal opinion.
Right now this is my pre-spring opinion of the Big 12. I could have a change of mind on a couple of these teams by summer. But this is how I'm feeling it now:
Big 12 South
1.Texas-In my opinion the team to beat in the South. I might be a little off on my numbers, but I'm counting 9 players coming back on offense and 8 on defense. Plus a second year defensive coordinator who should have his system fully implemented in '09. Some questions lie on the DL. But keep in mind they had some questions last season too. They used a converted RB at one of the DE positions last year. And they have some very good talent coming back this year. I actually think the Horns bigger question on defense will be their secondary. They had problems at times trying to stop the pass against teams like OU, TT and Baylor. So they'll have to improve there this year without Orakpo putting on the pass rush. Still, this could be the best offense in the nation. And I'll make a little prediction. Because of what happend last season with Texas and the BCS/Big 12 computer snubbing, Mack Brown isn't going to be Mr. Niceguy. He's going to run up the score in every game, regardless of their opponent. You can bank on it. When Texas is this good it's usually bad news for OU. Plus the Horns have an easy Big 12 schedule and a pussy OOC schedule.
2.(Tie) Oklahoma-The Sooners big question lie in the OL, WR LB positions. It makes the Sooners a little bit of a mystery team. Some lines come together faster than others. So this is one thing that not even the best prognosticators can predict. It's also going to take Bradofrd a while to get on the same page with his new WR's. One thing is probably for sure, Bradford isn't going to have 8 seconds in the pocket this season to throw the ball to whoever he wants. My bet is he's going to be tested bigtime as a QB. And he may be wishing he had gone pro when he had a chance. This is one thing I feel about 80% sure of. When you lose two cogs of your offense (WR, OL) I don't care how good you are at reloading, when you have a schedule like OU has this year, it tells me that things won't come as easy on offense. The defnese could be one of the best in the country. But I still have the same concerns that we had last season. Special teams and the LB position. These are the two things that cost OU against the Horns last season. And with the injuries that OU has had at the LB position, it puts a little doubt in my head. Especially since their star player Ryan Reynolds is still hurting and will skip spring practice. Tough call on the Sooners. They could be no better than the second or third best team in the south. Or they could be another BCS title team.
2.(Tie) OSU-Yes, I think they could be this good. Their big question will once again be defense. And their third DC in the last 4 years come in with Bill Young taking over. But you may remember him from the Kansas team who made it all the way to a BCS game in 2007. He is definitely one of the very best DC's in the country. And this alone makes me think OSU can only be better on that side of the ball. The offense could be as close or as good as Texas. This team seems to get just a bit better every year. And they definitely have their stuff together in Stillwater. Gundy has a very good system working despite losing a few coaches over the last couple of years. And the reason why is because everytime he replaces a coach it's an upgrade from the last. This team will once again be a bigtiome threat. And if their defense comes together they'll even be a big threat on the road. They move up this year.
4.Texas Tech-Although they lose their key playmakers on offense, they still return a ton of players. And Leach has recruited very well the last couple of years. The defense will be improved. The offense will be a work in progress. But if I know Leach, he'll have things figured out by fall.
5.Baylor-This is still a team that lacks the playmakers that it takes to be competetive in the South. Griffin can't do it alone. But in Briles second year I expect them to make a few strides. The Bears need more skill players. But I like the general attitude of this team under Briles. They'll have to step up and win one or two games their not supposed to win to make it to a bowl.
6.Texas A&M-The same problem as Baylor. Not enough skill players. But they have to make some big improvements on both lines, who were physically outmuscled by the big boys last season. We'll find out just how good of a coach that Sherman is this season. They get Baylor at home. So that game could deterim the cellar dwellar in the South. Sherman has recruited better than i thought he would. And he may have to use some of these "diaper dandies" right out of the chute if he hopes to compete. My feeling is they are a year away from being a bowl team.
I'll be back later with my feelings about the Big 12 north.
Last edited: