BetWWTS.com Suspends Betting on TV Show

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,156
Tokens
18 September 2003

ST. JOHN'S, Antigua – (Press Release) -- BetWWTS.com, a leading offshore gaming company for over 10 years, has suspended betting on the latest installment of "Survivor" before the first episode will air this evening. Company suspicions arose when BetWWTS.com received a number of wagers all placed on the same contestant from newly opened accounts originating from Vancouver, British Columbia.

Company officials indicated that in the past, betting on reality shows like `Survivor' is extremely light before the first episode airs, but on this occasion, BetWWTS.com has seen a deluge of bets on the show. Of all of the money wagered on "Survivor" to date, nearly 95% originated from new accounts in the Vancouver area and all was placed on the same castaway -- leaving the company with a liability in excess of $30,000 on one contestant.

Management investigated the origin of the betting yesterday and decided the risk was too great to continue offering "Survivor" betting.

"In the past few days we have received an abnormally high amount of maximum limit wagers on the same contestant from new customers in the Vancouver area, which has forced us to suspend betting on "Survivor"," said

Simon Noble, CEO of BetWWTS.com. "Whether this is a case of one of the contestants or someone involved with the show accidentally exposing the identity of one of the two finalists, or simply the by-product of rumor, it is still a highly unusual betting pattern and we felt we must react accordingly."

This marks the third time that BetWWTS.com has suspended wagering on a reality television show because of unusual betting patterns. In November 2002, BetWWTS.com halted betting on "The Bachelor" when it was discovered that a number of new accounts originating from Springfield, Missouri -- hometown of bachelor Aaron Buerge -- had all wagered on eventual winning bachelorette, Helene. Earlier this year, the company suspended betting on "Survivor": The Amazon when it appeared that CBS employees had been placing wagers on Jenna and Matt, who were ultimately the final two contestants vying for the $1 million grand prize.

"Although CBS may say this is simply another conspiracy theory about the show, we've followed betting patterns on shows like this before and discovered that in each instance, there were indeed people with inside knowledge wagering on the outcome," concluded Mr. Noble.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
484
Tokens
I never could understand how you could offer action on an event that has already occurred. Gives the term Smart Money an upgrade
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,857
Tokens
Simon Noble is a genious. That's just a marketing ploy. He pulled the same thing last year. CNN and all the major networks mentioned it and his site.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
tt,

one of the guys at intertops was telling me that simon did the same thing while he was at intertops for the survivor show. CNN ran the story and during the story incorrectly reported that Intertops was the only legal internet gaming site in the world.

Subsequently new customer acquisition spiked for the next week. Excellent marketing, bad reporting = windfall.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,856
Tokens
Funny that this topic would come up, a friend from that area (Victoria) which is near Vancouver tried convincing me that he knew who the winner was. I didn't wager it of course because I have never trusted tips i.e. inside info. Seems like everyone has a winner, that is until it loses.

Take it for what it's worth but here is HIS winner.

main_pic.jpg

Nicole Delma
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,857
Tokens
Bodog tried the same trick but i don't think it worked since they pissed off a lot of people by voiding the bets.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,156
Tokens
How many people did it piss off? 500 or 1000? it won't close them down. u guys continuously seem to think that there is no public or customers outside of this forum. point being these forums are less than 1% of ANY books total players.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
339
Tokens
Does this mean WWTS is 'VOIDING' all wagers that have been placed to date?


HateTheRiverCard. I was looking forward to watching this show. My enthusiasm has been dampened considerably by your post
icon_mad.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,856
Tokens
Sorry about that, but honestly I don't think anyone knows who the winner is or there would be alot more about it posted all over the net. If I thought it was 100% cut and dry then I would have put a few bucks down.

As well I just don't see a chic winning this thing anyways. (Sorry Angelle)
icon_biggrin.gif
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
802
Tokens
I think WWTS should post the name of the supposed winner. This would deflate claims by CBS that it was all hype by WWTS.
This is 4th or 5th Survivor? Who gives a rat's ass? Just have WWTS post the "winner", so we can all see if this is BS.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
348
Tokens
The fact of the matter is there are several
people who know the winner. I think all the
survivor participants know the winner. The losers don't get paid so why not disclose the
winner to a person who can open several off-
shore accounts and make money. I'll bet there
at least 50 people who know the Pearl Island
winner. Camera men, Production assistants and
the like. Most of them probably make about $40-
100K a year in salary. If you could make an extra $10k knowing you wouldn't get caught you
would jump at it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,832
Messages
13,573,790
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com