Betus and royal?

[nana1908]

i am new to the rx and love the threads. after posting at mw for a short time i found out that they never answer a question, just give you a hard time. my question is how do you feel about these books, mw says they are A+ books, top notch. i read otherwise. being new can i get a real answer thats unbiased please.

 

[Fishhead]

Welcome to the RX Nana.

You will undoubtedly find many responses to your question here at the RX.

Here is a link to a recent thread concerning ROYAL that may be of interest to you as it involves one of many slow pays that ROYAL has experienced in recent months.

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=286153

 

[nana1908]

ty fishhead , warm welcomes here. im not use to that.

 

[ChuckSims]

nana1908, BetUs is as shady or more so as Bet Royal. BetUs tried to advertise at TheRX recently and were turned down flat. A poster by the name of "MyFootballGame" was robbed by them after he used the deposit bonus he received and won a big underdog bet. BetUs refused to pay him. TheRX did all they could but BetUs just thumbed their nose at the poster.

 

[Pokerking]

I wouldn't trust the Majorwager on their reviews on their advertisers. Whenever anything negative is said about their advertisers they defend them weather they're right or wrong. The RX is much more objective on their opinions of Sportsbooks weather they're an advertiser or not.

 

[nana1908]

i totally agree with you , i found out the hard way. m.w. is totally untrustable and seems to not look at any issues. they are like politions there never an answer to a question in any way, .they change the subject and try to find fault in what you say instead of answering the question.

 

[Minnow]

nana, that's bullshit. lots of people answered your questions, even though it was obvious you were a "new poster" with some sort of agenda. You are a joke and a bullshit artist, so you should fit right in here.

pokerking, someone made a remark about maybe you shouldn't be judging a book since you are employed by a competitor, or something like that.

 

[Stickie]

Pokering you just got beat up at MW for a small comment about BCN. Much more feisty over there. Much more mundane responses over here. If you keep your wits about you MW will answer your questions, besides the MAJOR backs all his books with a $1000 guarentee for each player. Man there is a bunch of book bashing over here.

 

[nana1908]

im a regular person that is new to the online betting world and i do not in any way work for any competitor. i asked a few questions at m.w. that everyone got annoyed with because i am new.i had a little fun posting my picks just trying to make people laugh and thats all. i ask a few questions about books that get rated bad that are advertised at m.w. and everyone steams down my throat just as you are.what can i say its just my opinion. can you tell me why i am unable to post at m.w.?

 

[nana1908]

as everyone will see here. im a nice person who just likes to get treated well. i didnt get that at all at m.w. now did i.be honest minnow.

 

[spidermonkey]

as everyone will see here. im a nice person who just likes to get treated well. i didnt get that at all at m.w. now did i.be honest minnow.

you are joke and a bad one at that.

 

[nana1908]

see what is minnow implying when saying im a bullshit artist and i should fit in here. i think minnow is downing everyone at the rx. now why do that, if minnow feels like that about me so be it but put everyone here in the sme catagory. thats exactly how i got treated there thats all im saying.

 

[Pokerking]

Minnow is out of line to bash the RX and Nana like that. She's implying that the RX is a bunch of scammers is totally out of line. I find the RX is much more objective and that's why I went to the RX when I had my dispute with Sportbet. With the help of the RX it was resolved to everyone's satisfaction. I think that the Majorwager has become a lot less objective over the years when it comes to their advertisers.

 

[Fishhead]

Pokerking- Hope all is well with you buddy.

If I can be of any assistance ever, don't hesitate to get in touch with me at Fishhead@theRX.com

Will you be attending this years bash festivities?

-Fishhead-

 

[Pokerking]

Thanks Fishead. I don't know yet if I can make it but I'll try my best. I want to win the poker tournament this year!

 

[nana1908]

i agree totally. yes i am upset with m.w. but that is because of how i was treated there. just like minnow was here to me. i just felt like, i was always asking the wrong question there.

 

[ClipJoint]

i agree totally. yes i am upset with m.w. but that is because of how i was treated there. just like minnow was here to me. i just felt like, i was always asking the wrong question there.

Damn bro...I understand you didn't like they way they treated you. But are you going to post this in every post you make in every thread? I'm starting to feel like you have an agenda too.

 

[nana1908]

of course i have an agenda, i was treated like crap there and its fresh in my head.so im letting it be known.thats human nature . and im curios how other feel about m.w. or if its only me.

 

[TheGeneral+]

You are a joke and a bullshit artist, so you should fit right in here.

Hmmmm

Nice commentary about a solid asset like the Rx. We know you didn't mean it that way though.

:grandmais

 

[MYFOOTBALLGAME]

Betus, Omni Sportsbook, Little Nasa...all the same books. All the same crooks.

I had a $2500 Bonus Play that I played on a big dog that won $25,000. They said I have to roll it over 10x. I did it. They said I had to roll it over 10x more. I did it, then they said they only counted the low end on action so I ended up giving them over 1 million dollars in action...and then they said I shouldn't of been able to play a Bonus Play at 10 to 1 odds so I'm not entitled to any of the 25k.
They expected me to lose my 20k I had in the account and the 25k I won on the Bonus Play with this million in action. But there plan didn't work............................................................and all I can say to the JRizzo punk ass brothers is.............................:finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: