I think Ewing was more important for winning games, but a good chunk of what he did was due to his size. Miller was more skilled. How do we define "better"?
I think Ewing was more important for winning games, but a good chunk of what he did was due to his size. Miller was more skilled. How do we define "better"?
Exactly what I was thinking. Ewing would be the player I would choose if I was drafting a player for my team.I think Ewing was more important for winning games, but a good chunk of what he did was due to his size. Miller was more skilled. How do we define "better"?