Hey Zit I was at the actual Freaknik. Pretty fly for a white guy LOL
https://www.google.com/search?q=fre...CU8u7KAhXGWRoKHX58BpYQsAQIKA&biw=1272&bih=592
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freaknik
https://www.google.com/search?q=fre...CU8u7KAhXGWRoKHX58BpYQsAQIKA&biw=1272&bih=592
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freaknik
+22
Eerie: The meeting between the men is similar to the one Sharpton had around the same time and at the same place with Obama during the 2008 primary (Sharpton and Obama above in April 2014)
+22
Allies: Clinton before he addressed the Ninth Annual National Action Network Convention in 2007
.
Eerie: The meeting between the men is similar to the one Sharpton had around the same time and at the same place with Obama during the 2008 primary (Sharpton and Obama above in April 2014)
+22
Allies: Clinton before he addressed the Ninth Annual National Action Network Convention in 2007
.
"Sanders means MORE. More IawIessness, more críme, more open borders, more MusIíms, more persecutíon of Chrístians, more taxes, more abortíons, more women who used to be men, more "free" goodies for the Iazy. How can we go wrong with MORE?"
.
"Sharpton doesnt give a cr@p anout Bernie he just wants cameratime."
.
"Stay away from that little R aci st , there is NO good that comes from having anything to do with him. It's gonna cost you more votes than it gains."
.
.
"Sharpton doesnt give a cr@p anout Bernie he just wants cameratime."
.
"Stay away from that little R aci st , there is NO good that comes from having anything to do with him. It's gonna cost you more votes than it gains."
.
| - FEBRUARY 10TH, 2016 - | |
VICTORY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE | |
|
Cash and Bern! Sanders raised more than $5.2 million from nearly 153,000 people in less than a day following sensational New Hampshire victory
.
- Sanders’ camp says it’s the most it’s ever raised in a single day
- Campaign disclosed an average donation of $34, indicating that 153,000 people gave in 18 hours
- He called for a spontaneous fundraiser in his victory speech; so many of his supporters were giving that his fundraising website crashed
-
- In January he outraised Hillary Clinton for the first time, taking in $20 million to her $15 million - she also raised $5 million for the national party
.
at this point, I have no knowledge of Bernie being the vile, corrupt, lying, criminal POS Hillary is
I disagree with him politically, maybe even as much as I disagree with the least prepared man in the room, but I can't hate an honest man that happens to disagree with me
Barry, Hillary, Harry, Nancy and Kerry are just lying worthless psycho-shit buffoons, I'd spit in their faces if given the opportunity. I really despise such scum
I disagree with him politically, maybe even as much as I disagree with the least prepared man in the room, but I can't hate an honest man that happens to disagree with me
Barry, Hillary, Harry, Nancy and Kerry are just lying worthless psycho-shit buffoons, I'd spit in their faces if given the opportunity. I really despise such scum
Not to be outdone….Look at the vile scum kooky Bernie is chumming up with now. Unbelievable.
Off a staggering defeat in New Hampshire (at least in terms of actual votes) Hillary Clinton is doubling down on her campaign strategy, making sure to pander to all the right audiences.
With that in mind, Hillary for America announced Tuesday that Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner, will be campaigning for Clinton alongside Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin.
Take that! Bernman
This is unreal! 
hno:
How Bernie Sanders lost the New Hampshire primary
As you may recall, the Iowa Democrat caucus ended with Hillary Clinton allegedly holding a lead of roughly one quarter of one percent of the total number of micro-delegates or bitcoins or quarks or whatever it is they measure them in. (Not that it matters, since they won’t tell you how many people voted anyway.) In any event, Clinton and Sanders were essentially tied. Then we headed over to New Hampshire with its 24 pledged Democrat delegates. Sanders blew Clinton’s doors off there, taking roughly 60% of the votes. So at this point the delegate race should be pretty close, with only a slight edge for Bernie. Unfortunately, we had a good estimate last night of how the score really stands.
Wait.. what?
If you thought the way the Democrats count the votes in Iowa is messed up, that’s nothing compared to the way they wrangle their delegates. The Daily Caller has a good breakdown of this farce which takes place every four years.
Lest we go away thinking the GOP is pure as the driven snow, they have some floating delegates as well, but the number is a lot lower than that of the Democrats. There are three RNC-member delegates for each state and an additional set of bonus delegates which are assigned based on an arcane formula fully understood by at least a dozen people in the country. (I’m just guessing here, but I don’t imagine a lot of them are wearing Make America Great Again ball caps or TrusTed lapel pins.) But even for those extras and bonuses, the GOP formula is still miles closer to being an accurate reflection of the voters’ wishes than the Democrats’ method.
Good luck, Bernie. You may have to win all 57 states in a landslide to take Hillary out.
hno:How Bernie Sanders lost the New Hampshire primary
As you may recall, the Iowa Democrat caucus ended with Hillary Clinton allegedly holding a lead of roughly one quarter of one percent of the total number of micro-delegates or bitcoins or quarks or whatever it is they measure them in. (Not that it matters, since they won’t tell you how many people voted anyway.) In any event, Clinton and Sanders were essentially tied. Then we headed over to New Hampshire with its 24 pledged Democrat delegates. Sanders blew Clinton’s doors off there, taking roughly 60% of the votes. So at this point the delegate race should be pretty close, with only a slight edge for Bernie. Unfortunately, we had a good estimate last night of how the score really stands.
So after a tie in Iowa and a strong win in New Hampshire, Sanders is only losing the delegate race by 352.
Wait.. what?
If you thought the way the Democrats count the votes in Iowa is messed up, that’s nothing compared to the way they wrangle their delegates. The Daily Caller has a good breakdown of this farce which takes place every four years.
For the real wonks out there who have never looked into it, amNewYork has a fairly good set of links explaining all of the byzantine Democrat rules. The bottom line is that the Democrat nominee will need 2.382 delegates to carry the day at their convention as compared to the 1.237 the GOP requires. But if the Democrat establishment doesn’t like you (read: if you are Bernie Sanders) you are starting out with a huge hill to climb no matter how much the voters like you. You’ll have to not only muster enough support to outnumber your opponent’s vote count, but enough beyond that to defeat the built in firewall represented by the superdelegates.
Lest we go away thinking the GOP is pure as the driven snow, they have some floating delegates as well, but the number is a lot lower than that of the Democrats. There are three RNC-member delegates for each state and an additional set of bonus delegates which are assigned based on an arcane formula fully understood by at least a dozen people in the country. (I’m just guessing here, but I don’t imagine a lot of them are wearing Make America Great Again ball caps or TrusTed lapel pins.) But even for those extras and bonuses, the GOP formula is still miles closer to being an accurate reflection of the voters’ wishes than the Democrats’ method.
Good luck, Bernie. You may have to win all 57 states in a landslide to take Hillary out.
