mrhognuts said:
Not recapping the game just restating what I used to back up my play on the Mets today...thats all...It seems no one else is going to be giving or sharing legit information that makes a good argument to have even taken the Philly's except that they were + money...+ money bets dont mean a thing if you lose them, right....Thats why I stated that I would like to hear the reasons and backing that those who say they were Sharp because they were on the Phillies were using to justify a play on them...and beside the fact that they were underdogs...
And yes I know that its about the %%% over the long haul...that is why I posted that if you followed the Mets overal in all games vs the Phillies this year your a Winner....If you followed the Mets in all games at Home your a Winner...If you followed the Mets at Home this year vs Philly your a Winner...and if you followed the Phillies in their Road games this year you are on the Losing End...
So based on this, how can anyone say that it's SHARP to be on the Phils last night....and if you about long run %%%% then why not follow the winning Trends that is producing $$$$ results? ....Going with the Philly's just because they were a dog is not Smart at all...and doing so last night just goes against your "psst, its about the long haul theory"...as these 4 trends proves so..
Mets 9-4 vs Philly overall..
Mets 6-2 vs Philly at Home this year.
Mets at Home 41-25.
Philly on the Road 30-34.
This is why all the Crap about what Sharps and the Public is doing should be ignored..or at least put in better perspective...and people should really stop worrying about that...Just do your homework and work at getting better in this game...like you really want to Win $$$...To me that is a better way to get that long haul %%% and $$$, imo. :digit:
>)~ 
