WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE RULING IN THIS SCENARIO:
SELIG HAD SAID PRIOR TO GAME THAT THERE WOULD BE
NO SHORTENED GAME--THERE WOULD BE A RAIN DELAY FOR 1 OR 2
OR MORE DAYS IF NECESSARY.
SO, SAY THERE ARE 5 COMPLETE INNINGS AND SCORE 2-1 PHILLIES
THEN A RAIN DELAY IS CALLED - NOT A SUSPENSION -
A RAIN DELAY - a 2 DAY DELAY AS IT TURNS OUT -BUT A RAIN DELAY NONTHELESS
IN THIS CASE IS THERE STILL A PAYOUT TO PHILLIES
OR NO PAYOUY UNTIL GAME CONTINUES, AS IT WAS NEVER
SUSPENDED JUST IN A LONG LONG RAIN DELAY
SELIG HAD SAID PRIOR TO GAME THAT THERE WOULD BE
NO SHORTENED GAME--THERE WOULD BE A RAIN DELAY FOR 1 OR 2
OR MORE DAYS IF NECESSARY.
SO, SAY THERE ARE 5 COMPLETE INNINGS AND SCORE 2-1 PHILLIES
THEN A RAIN DELAY IS CALLED - NOT A SUSPENSION -
A RAIN DELAY - a 2 DAY DELAY AS IT TURNS OUT -BUT A RAIN DELAY NONTHELESS
IN THIS CASE IS THERE STILL A PAYOUT TO PHILLIES
OR NO PAYOUY UNTIL GAME CONTINUES, AS IT WAS NEVER
SUSPENDED JUST IN A LONG LONG RAIN DELAY