The effect of Alcohol on Betting has now been categorised and one can now take into consideration how many drinks add to the equation.
All findings based on a good sharp ( Like myself) win percentage
NO DRINK 62%
:drink: 57%
:drink::drink:54%
:drink::drink::drink:50%
I am not allowed anymore images but obviously 4 or more is suicidal. I can only think that looking at the findings, I must be a mutant as I always hit over 50% with 10+ drinks, maybe Pythagoras had a lost theorem that could explain it.
On the contrary, if Alcohol degrades winning punters, what about the dopes that hit 42% that dont drink, maybe it will have the opposite effect. This could have far reaching problems for Books as one time squares hit the bottle and the pay-out window:toast:
All findings based on a good sharp ( Like myself) win percentage
NO DRINK 62%
:drink: 57%
:drink::drink:54%
:drink::drink::drink:50%
I am not allowed anymore images but obviously 4 or more is suicidal. I can only think that looking at the findings, I must be a mutant as I always hit over 50% with 10+ drinks, maybe Pythagoras had a lost theorem that could explain it.
On the contrary, if Alcohol degrades winning punters, what about the dopes that hit 42% that dont drink, maybe it will have the opposite effect. This could have far reaching problems for Books as one time squares hit the bottle and the pay-out window:toast: