The writer Jeff Haney knows less about gambling than the pope. He keeps saying "correlated parlay" are baseball +150 or more road dogs to the Over or home fav to the Under. Huh? Later in the article he disproves his own correlated parlay talk by saying +150 or more road dogs to the Over parlay is 2-22 so far this year.
D2bets, There is no correlation what so ever in a baseball underdog winning and the game going over the total. If that was true I would be rich. As Ken White said, Las Vegas books will let you parlay side and total in the same game all day long.
D2bets, There is no correlation what so ever in a baseball underdog winning and the game going over the total. If that was true I would be rich. As Ken White said, Las Vegas books will let you parlay side and total in the same game all day long.
Re-read it again..."ROAD dogs to the over and HOME fav to the under". Not so sure the dog/fav adds (or subtracts) much, but the road/over and home/under are correlated, to an extent.