Anyone seen the Durham Report? was supposed to be out late winter / early spring

[Dave007inVegas]

Solomon was on with Lou Dobbs last night and said Durham will be handing out his first indictments next week but they will be "low level"

Today, Nunes confirmed Solomon's statement but said one high level indictment is coming sooner, not later, and while didn't use him by name was clearly referring to Comey

Nunes has seen the entire unredacted report and said the Russia stuff is incredibly silly. While Steele is the man typically referred to as the creator of the pee story Durham is close to showing it was HRC's campaign that fabricated it and then gave it to Steele to start his sideshow. Nunes laughed off the Russian connection because not one person mentioned by Steele and others as Russian intelligence had any idea about the story nor is there any evidence they've even heard of Steele. He hinted that the UK seems tightly involved in this and the more the media pushes this new "russian disinformation" narrative the more he beleives Durham will produce the HRC>Steele>UK Govt>FBI link

So expect some low level indictments to get this ball rolling with some possibility of one higher-level guy, like Comey, tossed in. Both Nunes and Solomon said this is just the beginning and that Durham has always attacked this as a criminal matter and not simply some fact-finding.

I'm giving them until May 1 to at least see some indictments and will lose interest after that

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]If Comey goes down then they should all go down. They acted in concert.

I've got a partial woody now after hearing this.

I'm hoping for a full bore erection in the coming weeks.

I hope I'm not disappointed.[/FONT]

 

[Michelangelo]

Chinaman say you get erection on November 3rd. Be patient.

 

[rolltide]

If Comey goes down then they should all go down. They acted in concert.

I've got a partial woody now after hearing this.

I'm hoping for a full bore erection in the coming weeks.

I hope I'm not disappointed.

I'm mostly chubbed up that Nunes insisted this was never a fact-finding mission like the press reported in first week of December. This was always a criminal investigation so there doesn't need to be some 1400 page "Durham Commission" report that we were expecting. This is a bunch of folks already been in front of a grand jury, more evidence to uncover, and indictments to come when it's fairly airtight. In no way do I expect HRC or BHO to be exposed but Comey & Atkinson and perhaps Brennan will be in the sightlines.

It will start as low-level indictments...as in the people who typed up the FISA requests...but, right now, not the people that told them what to include.

When they said a Durham report in the spring I thought it was the business-as-usual massive document that exposes nothing. We can tell by the footnotes that isn't the case. The FBI contention they never even heard of the Steele dossier until July 2017 has already fallen apart because, right there in the footnotes, it explains that Steele informed his FBI handler (and many others) in Spring 2016 about the dossier.

Nunes made a point to say the more the media tries to say the FBI made mistakes by believing Russian disinformation the more you know Durham is getting closer to exposing the Killary campaign and heavily pointing back to the UK and other supposed allies. He said pretty clearly that FBI knew that not only did Russia have little interest in who won the presidency but they still don't. It's fairly inconsequential to them but very consequential to UK and other allies that promoted the information that the FBI knew was a fabrication but ran with it anyway

 

[StevieRay]

Lock Em all up